Ark. judge strikes down heartbeat-based abortion ban

Last updated on: March 20, 2014 at 6:01 am by CNA Daily News

Ark. judge strikes down heartbeat-based abortion ban 2014-03-20T06:01:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Little Rock, Ark., Mar 20, 2014 / 12:01 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A U.S. District Court’s ruling against Arkansas’ fetal heartbeat-based abortion restrictions disappointed pro-life advocates, but they said the effort still helps the unborn.

Arkansas State Senator Jason Rapert, who sponsored the legislation, said that despite the ruling, the law was still “a win for the pro-life movement” because of its other provisions.

“When people have to face the reality that there’s a living heartbeat in their womb, that will make them rethink about taking the life away from their baby,” he told the Associated Press.

Jerry Cox, president of the Arkansas-based Family Council, said advocacy for the law was still worthwhile.

“I believe the only way we’re going to change things for the better is by challenging the status quo of abortion,” Cox said, according to ArkansasNews.com.

The March 2013 law would have barred most abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy on the grounds that the unborn child has a heartbeat at that point. The legislation would have created the strictest restrictions on abortion in any U.S. state.

U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright, in a March 14 decision, said the law was unconstitutional on the grounds that only a doctor can determine whether or not an unborn child can live outside of its mother.

The judge stated that viability, an unborn child's ability to survive outside of its mother, rather than heartbeat should determine whether abortions should be allowed. Viability is typically placed at around 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Her decision said that legal precedent means only “viability ‘begins’ with a heartbeat” and precedent “does not declare that viability is fully achieved with the advent of a heartbeat.”

She added that the Supreme Court has “stressed that it is not the proper function of the legislature or the courts to place viability at a specific point in the gestation period.”

Laws based on fetal heartbeat, she wrote, "would undoubtedly contravene the Supreme Court’s determination that viability in a particular case is a matter for medical judgment.” She said viability is attained when “there is a reasonable likelihood of sustained survival outside the womb.”

She added that the state “presents no evidence that a fetus can live outside the mother's womb at twelve weeks.”

Last year Webber Wright halted the law’s enforcement pending judicial review. She left in place other parts of the law that require doctors to search for a fetal heartbeat and to tell the mother if a fetal heartbeat is detected.

Before the law passed, Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe vetoed the bill, saying its lack of a viability standard would lead to legal challenges. The state legislature overrode his veto.

The state attorney general’s spokesman Aaron Sadler told the Associated Press March 14 that Webber Wright’s decision was “not a surprise.” As of March 14, the attorney general had not decided whether to appeal the decision.

Sen. Rapert urged an appeal, saying that a national pro-life organization has volunteered to defend the law at no cost to state taxpayers if it is designated special counsel.

Previous Post

March 19, 2014

Bishops' spokesman urges more humane immigration policy

Next Post

March 20, 2014 US bishops designate St John Paul II National Shrine

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Parable of the Good Samaritan, who ignored the injured man before the Samaritan helped?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A priest and a Levite A farmer and a shepherd A Roman soldier and a scribe A fisherman and a tax collector