Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
San Francisco project to promote beauty in music, liturgy

San Francisco project to promote beauty in music, liturgy

Last updated on: February 9, 2014 at 11:07 pm by CNA Daily News

San Francisco project to promote beauty in music, liturgy 2014-02-09T23:07:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

San Francisco, Calif., Feb 9, 2014 / 04:07 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A recently launched initiative in San Francisco will educate Church musicians about sacred music and train lay ministers for their roles, according to Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone.

“To recover a sense of our sacred music” is among the top objectives of the Benedict XVI Institute for Sacred Music & Divine Worship, the Archbishop of San Francisco told CNA Jan. 25.

“Beauty – as Pope Benedict has taught us – beauty evangelizes, lifts us up to God, so we need to recover that sense of beauty in our liturgical music.”

The institute had been launched at a Jan. 5 vespers service for the Epiphany, at which both the archbishop and the foundation's director, Fr. Samuel Weber, spoke.

The Benedictine priest taught the more than 200 attendants how to chant, and in his interview with CNA the archbishop affirmed that such a recovery of sacred music “really is just trying to do what the Church has asked us to do, at Vatican II and ever since, in all the documents on music and the liturgy, that the people also be well formed in singing the sacred repertoire.”

He alluded to the Vatican II document on the liturgy, “Sacrosanctum Concilium,” which acknowledged Gregorian chant as “specially suited to the Roman liturgy,” thus forming the core of the “sacred repertoire.”

“It doesn’t exclude other forms of music, as the (Vatican's) instructions say, although it says it should be in keeping with the sacred nature of the liturgy,” he explained, adding that the Benedict XVI Institute’s purpose “would be to promote chant, and perhaps to some extent polyphony.”

Contemporary music, too, will be included he said, saying, “this is perhaps a good idea, that musicians understand how to use contemporary music well, because it is very popular, and that will draw people too.”

“This is all about evangelization. We have lots of tools in the kit: a lot of them we’re not using, others we’re not using as well as we could. So let's use them,” and “let's use them well.”

Archbishop Cordileone said it is important that “musicians doing contemporary-style Church music should understand what is good music – because not all of it is even good musically – but also to understand the theology underlying the lyrics.”

He cited some songs as having “watered-down” or “bad theology,” while holding up songs “straight from Scripture – especially the Psalms” as examples of what can be given as “good formation” in sacred music “which lifts the soul.”

Fr. Weber, the institute’s director, is well-versed in Gregorian chant, but is also known for “updating” chant, producing English and Spanish language music in a chant style.

This reform in continuity – producing chant music in vernacular languages – is an example of neither breaking with the past, nor remaining stuck in it.

“That’s really what we’ve been dealing with in the Church for the past 50 years,” reflected Archbishop Cordileone, “rupture, versus continuity and reform.”

He named the new liturgical institute for Benedict XVI, who identified this “hermeneutic of continuity, saying that the emeritus Pope was “calling us to see the (Second Vatican) Council in the context of a historical continuity … building upon what came before; so Benedict was calling us to build upon, not replace,” the tradition of the Church.

“The Church builds on what it has received,” he said, and “Pope Benedict understood what was received.”

The second main purpose of the education institution, Archbishop Cordileone explained, is a more profound formation for laity who serve as lectors or extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion.

He explained that good training for such lay ministers, while essential, “isn’t enough.”

“There has to be a deeper formation, so it’s coming out of their heart, out of their soul, so they understand the true spirit of the liturgy and they have a liturgical spirituality.”

He cited the importance of lectors appreciating the context of readings and Biblical theology, and said extraordinary ministers “need to understand truly who it is they are handling, and to be formed in that deep respect for the Blessed Sacrament.”

The Benedict XVI Institute will be based at St. Patrick’s Seminary in Menlo Park, and will serve seminarians as well as laymen; according to its website it “supports pastors in their efforts to form lay people” for liturgical ministries and will offer courses both online and at parishes.

The new initiative is one among a number of acts Archbishop Cordileone has done in the 18 months he has served in San Francisco: he has also said a number of Masses in the extraordinary form, provided for regular celebration of the extraordinary form, and has provided for a new order, the Contemplatives of St. Joseph, to assist in liturgical reform and spiritual renewal in the archdiocese.

Previous Post

February 9, 2014

New app promotes Catholic social teaching

Next Post

February 10, 2014 Cardinal recalls shock of Benedict XVI's resignation

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who insulted and opposed David, then died after Abigail pleaded his case?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joab Ahithophel Amasa Nabal