Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Republican immigration plan draws hope, criticism

Republican immigration plan draws hope, criticism

Last updated on: February 4, 2014 at 12:47 am by CNA Daily News

Republican immigration plan draws hope, criticism 2014-02-04T00:47:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Feb 3, 2014 / 05:47 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- An immigration plan by House Republican leaders, aimed at both national security and pathways to legal status for undocumented migrants, has prompted calls for further dialogue and improvement.

Auxiliary Bishop Eusebio Elizondo of Seattle, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Migration, said in a Jan. 31 statement that while some aspects of the document are “troubling,” it “represents an important step” in the right direction.

“Achieving just immigration reform will not be an easy task and will require bipartisan cooperation and leadership, not politics,” the bishop stressed, adding that the Church “stands ready to assist in this effort.”

His comments came in response to an immigration plan outline released by Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The short outline does not give details on specific policy plans, but offers principles to guide the GOP’s approach to immigration reform in the House.

The House standards reject a previous comprehensive immigration reform bill put forth by a bipartisan group in the Senate, instead suggesting a “step-by-step, common-sense approach that starts with securing our country’s borders, enforcing our laws, and implementing robust enforcement measures.”

The document emphasizes border security, visa tracking and employment verification, as well as a “zero tolerance policy for those who cross the border illegally or overstay their visas in the future” after immigration reform is enacted.

However, it also acknowledges that America’s “national and economic security depend on requiring people who are living and working here illegally to come forward and get right with the law.”

While it would not allow a “special path to citizenship for individuals who broke our nation's immigration laws,” the plan would pave the way for these individuals to “live legally and without fear in the U.S.” if they are “willing to admit their culpability, pass rigorous background checks, pay significant fines and back taxes, develop proficiency in English and American civics, and be able to support themselves and their families.”

It also called for “legal residence and citizenship” for children who were brought into the country illegally “through no fault of their own” if certain eligibility standards are met, including military service or a college degree.

These reforms would not be initiated, however, “before specific enforcement triggers,” or security goals, “have been implemented.”

Kevin Appleby, director of migration policy for the U.S. bishops’ conference, told CNA Feb. 3 that while the change in policy is “an important step,” some concerns still remain.

“It’s a floor not a ceiling: there’s room for improvement,” Appleby said.

While the new principles may “ease the path of many,” he said, the bishops’ conference is still “certainly concerned about the undocumented,” and the possibility of deportation, particularly since there was no indication of how long the process for gaining legal status might take.

Furthermore, the principles suggested work visas but did not discuss any plans for immigrants with family in the United States, Appleby said.

He also questioned “the idea of triggers,” or “undefined border security goals,” noting that the language echoed that of other problematic policies.

While the latest Republican outline did not elaborate on what “enforcement triggers” would entail, he cautioned that they should not include measures penalizing “acts of kindness” toward undocumented migrants or laws allowing state and local police to act as deportation and detainment personnel.

Bishop Elizondo echoed these concerns in his commentary on the House Republican leadership’s statement.

“While we are pleased that there is a willingness to extend legal protection to those without status, we are concerned that most would be unable to achieve citizenship, leaving them as a permanent underclass – a minority without the same rights and protections of the majority,” the bishop said.

“The process of meeting border security goals could take years continuing to leave millions vulnerable to deportation,” he noted.

“This would establish a troubling precedent that is inconsistent with our nation’s founding principles.”

Despite these concerns, Bishop Elizondo welcomed the principles as the beginning of a Congressional conversation on immigration reform, “which hopefully will spark action in the House of Representatives to finally address our nation’s broken immigration system.”

“Congress must seize the moment and end the suffering of immigrants and their families,” he said.

Previous Post

February 3, 2014

Scottish Catholic agency free to follow beliefs against same-sex adoption

Next Post

February 4, 2014 The Church is not ours but Christ's, Austrian bishop stresses

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which New Testament book has the most Old Testament quotes?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Matthew Romans Hebrews Revelation