Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Lower abortion rate credited to culture shift, not contraception

Lower abortion rate credited to culture shift, not contraception

Last updated on: February 6, 2014 at 12:37 am by CNA Daily News

Lower abortion rate credited to culture shift, not contraception 2014-02-06T00:37:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Feb 5, 2014 / 05:37 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Despite claims that contraception is responsible for record-low abortion rates in the U.S., one researcher says pro-life laws and a growing ‘culture of life’ could be playing a significant role.

“It is unlikely contraceptive use has anything to do with the decline,” said Michael New, research associate for the Reproductive Research Audit.

Attributing the abortion decline to contraception, he argued, fails to take into account other statistics on birth control and unintended pregnancy, as well as changes in public opinion and the effects of pro-life legislation in recent years.

While the “data is far from perfect,” New told CNA Feb. 3, the organization behind the study does “acknowledge that some pro-life laws and clinic closures contributed” to declining abortion rates.

In addition, he said, numerous national studies on attitudes toward abortion show more clearly that pro-life “efforts to change the hearts and minds of Americans may be making a difference.”

New responded to a Feb. 3 report by the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive research organization formerly affiliated with Planned Parenthood. The report found that in 2011, there were 16.9 abortions per 1,000 U.S. women between the ages of 15 and 44.

This marks a 13 percent decrease from 2008, bringing the abortion rate to its lowest since the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion throughout the U.S. The current abortion rate reflects a drastic reduction from 1981's peak of 29.3 abortions per 1,000 women.

The Midwest experienced a 17 percent decrease in abortion from 2008 to 2011, the largest decline during that time period. The Northeast witnessed the smallest abortion decrease, with a 9 percent drop.

The study’s lead author, Rachel Jones, said that state-level abortion regulations are unlikely to be the cause of declining abortion, because many of them were implemented late in 2011.

Rather, she suggested that improvements in contraceptive use were responsible for the abortion decline, which “coincided with a steep national drop in overall pregnancy and birth rates.”

However, New contested this claim, arguing that other studies indicate little change in contraceptive use in recent years. In addition, he said, “Guttmacher's own studies show that the unintended pregnancy rate has remained about the same – and may be increasing slightly.”

The largest problem with the author's statements, New said, is that she “totally disregards changes in public opinion” in explaining the decline in abortion.

Since the early 1990s, he explained, the decline in abortion rate has been largest in regions “with the greatest increase in pro-life sentiment,” such as the South and Midwest.

Furthermore, he added, “six of the nine Gallup polls taken since May 2009 show that Americans are more likely to consider themselves 'pro-life' rather than 'pro-choice.'”

Leaders of pro-life organizations echoed New's comments and critiques.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of Americans United for Life, noted in a Feb. 3 statement that it “is impossible really to know the true abortion rate” because abortion doctors are not required to report on the abortions they perform.

She criticized the suggestion that pro-life laws have not impacted abortion rates. According to Guttmacher, more than 100 pro-life laws were enacted at the state level from 2008 to 2011.

“The truth is that these common-sense limits on abortion protect women and their unborn children from abortion industry abuses,” Yoest said, adding that “no matter how many abortions there are, abortion carries serious risks for both mother and unborn child,” and therefore warrants stricter regulations.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List, praised efforts aimed at “educating Americans about the reality of abortion, steadily changing hearts and minds.”

“The debates going on in the states and on the federal level to protect babies after 20 weeks, ban sex-selection, stop taxpayer funding of abortion, and more, are evidence themselves that our arguments are convincing,” Dannenfelser said.

“Guttmacher’s new report is another indication that our nation is indeed growing weary of the destruction wrought by legalized abortion on demand.”

Previous Post

February 5, 2014

Four-year-old asks Belgian king to block euthanasia of children

Next Post

February 6, 2014 UN versus Holy See on human sexuality, gender theory

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who built an ark for the animals?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hezekiah Solomon Noah David