Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Defense of conscience critical to pro-life movement, scholar says

Defense of conscience critical to pro-life movement, scholar says

Last updated on: January 27, 2014 at 11:08 pm by CNA Daily News

Defense of conscience critical to pro-life movement, scholar says 2014-01-27T23:08:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jan 27, 2014 / 04:08 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Prevailing attitudes toward abortion within the medical community show the need to safeguard conscience rights while working to protect life, said Princeton law professor Robert P. George.

“Today, many of those who would sanction and support the taking of human life by abortion or in embryo-destructive research have also made themselves the enemies of conscience,” said George in a Jan. 20 talk at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.

“We, who are the friends of life, must also be the friends of conscience.”

George, who is the chairman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, delivered the keynote address at the 2014 Cardinal O'Connor Conference on Life, the largest student-run pro-life conference in the country.

In addition to currently serving as the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University and a visiting professor at Harvard Law School, George previously served on the President's Council on Bioethics. He has written numerous books and articles on a variety of topics, including the defense of conscience, life and marriage.

Pointing to testimony given by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George explained that abortion supporters defend their position by discussing abortion “as if it were a matter of health care, rather than what it typically is, namely, a decision based upon non-medical considerations.”

The testimony presented by the medical organization illustrates a definition of “medicine,” he continued, that is “not about the preservation and restoration of health” in a concrete manner, but instead centers on “satisfying the personal preferences or lifestyle desires of people,” whether or not the surgeries and procedures they request “are in any meaningful sense medically indicated.”

Abortion, he said, is not a question of “'reproductive health' or health of any kind, precisely because direct abortions are not procedures designed to make sick people healthy or to protect them against disease.”

In the case of elective abortion, George observed, a woman is not sick. “Pregnancy is not a disease. It is a natural process.”

The push to label direct abortion as health care, he said, is not about medicine, but about ideology. “It is about politics and political power.”

Questions about the personhood of the unborn human and the morality of abortion can only be solved with the help of philosophic reflection and debate, the scholar stated. Calling abortion 'health care' as a matter of medicinal fact, is therefore “rhetorical manipulation” because it encompasses “a philosophical, ethical, and political opinion.”

“It is a judgment brought to medicine, not a judgment derived from it.”

George commented that it is misleading and dishonest to discuss elective abortion, in vitro fertilization and other procedures that “facilitate people's lifestyle choices” as if they were an essential part of medicine..

Efforts to do so represent “a sheer power play on behalf of pro-abortion individuals” in the medical profession, he added.

The report from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology depicts the medical profession going to great lengths to impose its “partisan position,” George said, and this shows “who in the debate is guilty of intolerance.”

Asserting that women have the “right” to demand that doctors kill their developing unborn babies, the report suggests limiting the right of doctors and other medical professionals to decline to perform of refer for abortions.

Ironically, George observed, “those responsible for the report and its recommendations evidently would use coercion” to force doctors and pharmacists to carry out procedures that violate their conscience.

On the other hand, he noted, a physician who refuses to participate in an abortion “is not 'imposing' anything on anyone.”

Ongoing attempts to coercively impose an accepting view of abortion on all doctors now threaten the consciences of pro-life physicians – and their ability to continue practicing, George said.

If the recommendations of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology were to be followed, he said, “their field of medical practice would be cleansed of pro-life physicians whose convictions required them to refrain from performing or referring for abortions.”

This means that faithful Catholic, Evangelical and other Protestant doctors, as well as many observant Jews and Muslims, would be forced out of medicine, he explained.

“The entire field would be composed of people who could be relied on either to agree with, or at a minimum go along with, the moral and political convictions of the report's authors,” he said.

In light of these trends, George called pro-life supporters to “be conscience’s best friends.”

He asked the students to resist definitions of abortion as healthcare, “not only for the sake of defending the lives of our most vulnerable brothers and sisters – children in the womb – but also in defense of what James Madison called 'the sacred rights of conscience'.”

“For many of us, standing up for conscience means defending the principles of our faith,” George said. “For all of us, standing up for conscience means defending principles on which our nation was founded.”

Previous Post

January 27, 2014

Pope Francis' writings on ecology could become encyclical

Next Post

January 27, 2014 US military expands accommodations for religious attire

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who received a coat of many colors?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Moses Joseph Jacob