Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
‘Extreme’ judicial appointee confirmed to key court position

‘Extreme’ judicial appointee confirmed to key court position

Last updated on: December 19, 2013 at 7:08 am by CNA Daily News

‘Extreme’ judicial appointee confirmed to key court position 2013-12-19T07:08:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Dec 19, 2013 / 12:08 am (CNA).- The confirmation of Cornelia “Nina” Pillard to the D.C. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has prompted concerns from critics worried about her “radical” views on abortion and religious freedom.

Ed Whelan, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Ethics and Public Policy Center and former clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, criticized Pillard’s “manifest extremism on abortion” and “extremism against religious liberty.”

Whelan offered reflections on Pillard’s confirmation in two Dec. 13 posts at “Bench Memos” for National Review Online.

He pointed to the fact “that three reputedly moderate Democrats voted against the Pillard’s nomination,” saying that this is a testament to her extreme views.

However, these votes against her also deal “a severe blow” to any “ambitions that Pillard might have had to use the D.C. Circuit as a stepping stone to the Supreme Court,” he said.

Pillard, a Georgetown University law professor, has won several significant arguments, opening Virginia Military Institute to women and securing the constitutionality of the Family and Medical Leave Act.

However, she also has a record of advocating strongly for an unqualified right to access abortion and contraception, against the ability to teach abstinence education.

In a 2007 piece entitled “Our Other Reproductive Choices: Equality in Sex Education, Contraceptive Access, and Work-Family,” Pillard argued that the promotion of abstinence education and restrictions on abortion are unconstitutional and “at odds with equal protection” clauses.

Her views have also sparked religious freedom concerns. When presenting a 2011 briefing on the then-upcoming 2011-2012 Supreme Court cases, Pillard opposed a ruling in favor of a Lutheran school’s right to hire and fire its own religious employees, saying that it was “a substantial threat to the American rule of law.”

When the Supreme Court decided the case, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC, it sided with the Lutheran school in a rare unanimous decision.

In September, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a ranking member of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, said in a testimony before the committee that additional judges in the court were unnecessary, in part because the D.C. Circuit has the lowest number of total appeals filed annually among all the circuit courts of appeals.

He added that a judge currently on the D.C. Circuit Court had told him that if “any more judges were added now, there wouldn’t be enough work to go around.”

Rather than responding to a legitimate need for more judges, Grassley voiced concern that the nominations may have been an effort by the Obama administration aimed at “switching the majority” of the court.

“I’m concerned,” he said of Pillard, “by the instances where she has really stretched the limits of thoughtful reasoning…at times she appears to advance her own extreme policy preferences.”

Carrie Severino, senior counsel for the Judicial Crisis Network, told CNA last month that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals “is the most underworked federal appeals court in the nation,” while other appellate courts – including the second, fifth and eleventh circuits – are facing “judicial emergencies” with far more cases than the judges can handle.

However, she observed, the location and structure of the D.C. Circuit make it incredibly important and powerful. The appeals court directly reviews, without prior hearing by a district court, the decisions and rules of many D.C.-based agencies within the federal government.

This means that rulemaking executed by agencies within the executive branch – such as intelligence agencies, the Federal Communications Commission, NASA, and the Federal Trade Commission, among others – go directly to this court.

Severino suggested that the additional judge may be intended to help “push” the administration’s regulatory agenda through the court.

Increased regulations have drawn particular concern in the Catholic community recently due to worries over religious freedom. Requirements such as the HHS mandate, which demands that employers provide health insurance covering contraception, sterilization and early abortion drugs for employees, have been criticized and challenged in court as an infringement on religious liberty.

Currently, the court is “evenly balanced,” Severino observed, and recent rulings against the Obama’s administration’s initiatives suggest that the court “will not be lenient enough” to “give him a pass” on initiatives that may be challenged in the future.

While the Senate initially failed to approve a cloture motion for Pillard, a change in procedural rules last month reduced the number of votes necessary to move forward in the approval process. Pillard was confirmed just after midnight on Dec. 12 by a 51-44 vote.

President Barack Obama congratulated her in a Dec. 13 statement, lauding her “landmark accomplishments on behalf of women and families,” and her “unwavering commitment to justice and integrity.”

The confirmation was also celebrated by Reproductive Health Reality Check, a contraception and abortion advocacy group which predicted that “the impact of Pillard’s confirmation could last for decades.”

Previous Post

December 19, 2013

Health group slams push for abortion in Catholic hospitals

Next Post

December 19, 2013 Vatican documents translated in Tongan spread Church teaching

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city was Paul heading to when he encountered Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Antioch Damascus Rome Jerusalem