Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Yale pro-life conference urges engagement with culture

Yale pro-life conference urges engagement with culture

Last updated on: October 26, 2013 at 11:02 pm by CNA Daily News

Yale pro-life conference urges engagement with culture 2013-10-26T23:02:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

New Haven, Conn., Oct 26, 2013 / 05:02 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- At Yale's first annual pro-life conference, advocates emphasized moving beyond current pro-life efforts to more directly address the issues and understandings of persons who do not see the dignity of all human life.

“Abortion might be the most boring moral issue we grapple with today,” said Michael Hannon, managing editor of The Thomistic Institute in New York City, a panelist at the Oct. 18 conference.

“That doesn’t mean it’s unimportant, and that certainly doesn’t mean we shouldn’t talk about it, but I do think it’s incredibly uninteresting, and I think it’s incredibly uninteresting because it’s incredibly obvious.”

Hannon spoke at an Oct. 18 panel called “Beyond the Pro-Life Pep Rally: Where we Go From Here?” alongside Tristyn Bloom and David Nolan, both junior fellows at First Things, and Nora Calhoun, a registered nurse and doula.

The conference, called "Vita et Veritas," or "Life and Truth," was held at Yale's St. Thomas More chapel and Catholic campus chaplaincy, and was sponsored by Choose Life at Yale, or CLAY. Co-sponsoring the conference were the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, Students for Life of America, Christian Union, and Life Matters Journal.

Hannon explained that in general, pro-life conferences “do a great good for us.” He warned, however, against a “pep rally” mentality among pro-lifers, and against a focus on abortion as a complicated moral question because, in reality, “abortion is the most black-and-white- issue there is.”

He said that he doesn’t see “how we can turn a blind eye” to a parent killing an unborn child, when there is a proper understanding of the reality of life more broadly.

The more interesting question, Hannon continued, is not whether or not the unborn are persons, or if abortion is moral, but “why does everyone not agree” on the meaning and value of life, and “what do we do about it?”

“Ethics is talked about as the ‘right response to reality,’” he explained, “and until we some coherent picture of what that reality is, talking about the right response just doesn’t make any sense.”

Bloom encouraged attendees to encounter modern society’s understanding of man and to take the risk of trying to understand many people’s acceptance of abortion.

“We are pathologically afraid of risk,” as a society, and our society understands a new life as a big risk entailing a complete change of lifestyle with life-changing responsibilities. This challenges the vision of control and risk minimization that much of our society likes to have, she said.

She pondered if treating “planned pregnancies as normal” is a way of dealing with the seeming incomprehensibility of our own existence, and the supposed meaninglessness of life.

Modern parents compensate for this meaningless through planning,” Bloom said.

“We are the little gods of our own children.”

“When we have something unchosen, unplanned, uninvited, it’s a direct attack on the very core of our own being,” she said, explaining society’s rationalization of abortion.

“I think we must live in one of the most bodily confused eras of human history,” Calhoun segued off of this theme.

“Our bodies are seen as simply possessions, machines, tools,” she explained, adding that we “over-identify with them as with possessions, machines, tools.”

“They define us because we’ve been taught that the purpose of maintaining these bodily machines is maintaining our autonomy.”

The vision of absolute personal autonomy fuels the abortion industry as it fuels other parts of our consumerist society, Calhoun added.

In contrast, the idea of a person, such as a child, depending upon another for their existence “is deeply deeply threatening to the currently dominant ideology that autonomy is personhood.”

“The pro-life movement needs to be witnessing to a radically different attitude towards bodies, but we aren’t doing a very good job of it right now.”

“Instead of promoting the radically different idea that no characteristic can confer personhood, we’re constantly undermining ourselves by over-emphasizing fetal and embryonic characteristics.”

“At the same time, we’re downplaying the tremendous unity between an unborn baby and her mother.”

While she admitted that “there’s certainly a place for education” on medical facts about the unborn, Calhoun argued that the emphasis of the pro-life movement should not be on topics such as fetal development, pain, or heartbeats.

“The problem is that we’re emphasizing the abilities and merits and strengths of the unborn, whereas I feel strongly that the real message of hope and justice that the pro-life movement carries is that there are no abilities or strengths that confer status, not even being viable or sentient or undamaged or wanted.”

“That’s the real message we should be promoting: that you cannot win or forfeit humanity.”

To fight the message of autonomy promoted by abortion, “we need to reacquaint ourselves with our bodies,” she said.

“We need a shared language that goes deeper than words usually can: I think bodies can be that language.”

Calhoun stated that not everyone is called to being a midwife or hospice worker, “but corporal works of mercy are open, and in fact, demanded of all, and they seem to me to be the best place to start. Let’s see how far they get us.”

Nolan encouraged pro-life advocates to not only consider the cultural mindsets underlying abortion, but also to extend “mercy to everything we encounter” and to extend the pro-life understanding and concern for life in the womb to other ethical areas in the process.

He encouraged the work that some pro-life activists have made for “treating animals mercifully,” questioning trends in industrial farming in which animals are raised in suffering and without concern for their well being.

“Our eating choices fall squarely into ethical ground, and we would do well to consider our choices.”

He acknowledged that “it’s frightening to consider moral choices that will change the way we live,” but encouraged pro-life supporters to consider the moral questions in all areas of life as they would have abortion supporters consider the morality of their lifestyle choices.

“Being really pro-life has worldview connotations; it demands that we go beyond a single-focus issue,” Nolan charged.

“We must be careful not to entrench ourselves in areas with a sporadically and single-issue focus that doesn’t recognize the underlying links.”

This doesn’t mean that people should abandon pro-life advocacy Nolan explained, but that pro-life advocates should open broader justice and mercy as part of a complete pro-life worldview.

“The most obvious place where justice and mercy meet is in the protection of the child in the womb.”

Previous Post

October 26, 2013

Sacraments are not mere 'decorations,' insists Pope

Next Post

October 27, 2013 Poll find voters split on 'gay marriage'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Nahum describes the Lord as riding in the whirlwind and storms. What does he say are the clouds?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His glory The dust of his feet His chariot His covering