War crimes tribunal suggested as alternative to strike on Syria

Last updated on: September 6, 2013 at 11:05 pm by CNA Daily News

War crimes tribunal suggested as alternative to strike on Syria 2013-09-06T23:05:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Sep 6, 2013 / 05:05 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A ranking member of the U.S. House has proposed a war crimes tribunal as an alternative to military intervention in Syria so that perpetrators can be held accountable for the use of chemical weapons.

“There is a compelling, moral imperative to immediately establish a comprehensive way to hold accountable all those on either side, including Assad, who have slaughtered and raped in Syria,” Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) affirmed in a Sept. 5 statement.

Smith offered the plan as a way to enforce international standards prohibiting the use of chemical weapons while avoiding an escalation of violence in the war-torn country.

He suggested that a Syrian War Crimes Tribunal established through the United Nations would be “a nonlethal alternative to missiles and bombs that carry huge risks of killing or maiming innocent civilians and exacerbating the conflict—all while putting American servicemembers at risk.”

Smith is a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and chairman of committee’s Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights and International Organization Subcommittee. His office confirmed in a press release that he has stated he will vote against U.S. military intervention in Syria.

Instead, he voiced his intent to propose immediate legislation to instruct the U.S. representative to the United Nations to work towards the establishment of a war crimes tribunal to deliver justice in a non-violent manner.

The congressman’s suggestion comes as Congress considers President Obama’s Sept. 1 call for the approval of military action against Syria, which has been caught in a violent civil war between government and rebel forces – both secular and Islamist – for more than two years.

In late August, reports indicated that chemical weapons had been used against civilians in the country, killing more than 1,400 people.

The Obama administration has said it has conclusive evidence that the regime of President Bashar al-Assad is responsible for these attacks, though the Syrian government denies this charge and blames the rebels for the use of chemical weapons.

The possibility of a military strike against Syria has sparked strong opposition from Russia, whose leaders say they have compiled an extensive report with evidence that rebels used chemical weapons back in March.

Smith affirmed in his statement that those “guilty of war crimes, genocide and other atrocities – whether committed by members of the Syrian government or the rebels – must be investigated and brought to justice.”

He advocated for the use of a war crimes tribunal in order to bring the guilty parties to justice because unlike “air strikes, a war crime tribunal neither indirectly assists jihadist forces in Syria, nor does it foster anger against Christian and other communities in Syria.”

The congressman cautioned, though, that if the United States is to pursue a tribunal, the establishment “of a court has to be immediate, and a comprehensive collection of evidence must begin now,” to ensure the trial’s success.

Smith also noted that these sorts of trials have been used in the past, and their lessons can prepare the United States for addressing the crimes in Syria.

“We have learned lessons from the Special Court in Sierra Leone, we have learned lessons from the Rwandan Court and certainly we have learned lessons from the court in Yugoslavia,” he said.

Previous Post

September 6, 2013

Dominican Republic bishops call for purification after nuncio scandal

Next Post

September 7, 2013 Pope Francis carries forward papal commitment to peace

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the first book of the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Luke Matthew Mark John