Proposition 8 still applies in California, backers say

Last updated on: July 16, 2013 at 8:09 am by CNA Daily News

Proposition 8 still applies in California, backers say 2013-07-16T08:09:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

San Francisco, Calif., Jul 16, 2013 / 02:09 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Proposition 8 backers have filed a legal brief saying that the ballot measure defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman still has legal force in California, alleging that state officials incorrectly acted in response to the recent Supreme Court decision on it.

“The U.S. Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of Proposition 8, and the district court’s injunction does not apply statewide; therefore, county clerks should abide by the state constitution,” said Austin R. Nimocks, senior counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom.

The Washington, D.C.-based legal group said July 12 that California State Registrar Tony Agurto wrongly ordered all county clerks to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in violation of state law after the June 28 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit lifted its stay of a district court’s injunction against Prop. 8, which passed in the 2008 elections.

The group said that the registrar does not have the authority to make such orders to county clerks and California Attorney General Kamala Harris was therefore wrong to threaten legal action against clerks who decline to follow the order.

On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit against Prop. 8, Hollingsworth v. Perry, on the grounds that defenders of Prop. 8 did not have legal standing to challenge the 2010 ruling of U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn R. Walker, which declared the ballot measure unconstitutional.

Alliance Defending Freedom’s legal petition to the California Supreme Court argues that the Supreme Court decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry vacated the 9th Circuit Court’s decision that declared Prop. 8 to be unconstitutional. This means that the constitutionality of Prop. 8 has not been sufficiently determined.

The petition asks for a legal mandate requiring state officials to comply with state law, which recognizes marriage as a union of a man and a woman.

“Everyone on all sides of the marriage debate should agree that the legal process must be followed. Public officials should enforce the marriage amendment because they are not bound by the district court’s injunction,” Nimocks said.

Previous Post

July 16, 2013

Non-profit takes over several Philadelphia archdiocese schools

Next Post

July 16, 2013 Philosopher lauds Pope's thriving Latin Twitter account

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Nebuchadnezzar" mean in Akkadian?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Chosen by the gods King of Babylon O Nabu, protect my heir The Lord reigns