Professor says religion, private life are public concerns

Last updated on: June 4, 2013 at 11:01 pm by CNA Daily News

Professor says religion, private life are public concerns 2013-06-04T23:01:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jun 4, 2013 / 05:01 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- In a talk at the nation's capital, a U.S. scholar argued that so-called private entities – such as the family, religion and interpersonal interactions – involve and are in fact the core of public society.

“Religion itself is a rational insight into what it means to be human: what it means to to live in a particular place, to speak a particular language, to have particular family members, to be here and now,” said Dr. Susan Hanssen, an associate professor of history at the University of Dallas.

“If religion is the primary rational insight into our human condition, then it has to be also central to our public discourse, these are all public relations,” she noted.

Hanssen spoke June 3 at the Catholic Information Center in Washington, D.C.

During her remarks, she argued that the private bonds of religion and family life are the root of public relations, and that historically, America has had “laws that have this sort of reverence” for the family and the Church.

“A father’s relationship to his children is a public relation that has to be respected in law,” Hanssen said, “the marriage bond is a public relation that is of concern to everyone because it is the core of society,” and these relations have been protected in public society.

Hanssen distinguished between the nation and the state, arguing that while the state is a purely political entity, “the nation has to recognize both the natural existence of the family and the church,” incorporating both into the well-being of society.

She explained that historically, the state “was the only corporate sovereign that had any right to exist,” whereas within a nation, “there is, beyond the polis, church and family.”

However, Hanssen noted, the United States and other countries have moved from an understanding of a society that incorporates corporate institutions such as the family and religion towards individualism.

Instead of the nation assisting the task “of creating and sustaining a family” and other corporate entities, instead there the state “tolerates” certain groups and collections of persons, Hanssen said.

She explained, though, that this trend does not ring the death knell for the Church or for families, saying that these social institutions “can’t die unless no one sustains them.”

Hanssen noted that despite popular conception, institutions of popular culture and political power don’t “have actual, human gravitational pull” because of their focus upon the individual.

Interpersonal, social institutions can be maintained and revived, she stated, because people “do still value genuine interpersonal relationships.” Hanssen added that the “the more vibrant” these forces are, “the more it becomes the center of gravity.”

She encouraged young persons to focus upon creating “truly personal communities” and supporting these corporate institutions, saying that the the maintenance of the family is “only thing that will work” in holding together the nation.

She also warned against those who wish to preserve the nation from becoming “desiccated, uprooted, solo, modern, individual yuppies fighting a policy battle to the death of Church, family, and love of patria,” saying that instead “it’s much more important to put effort into creating sustaining those groups.”

“Law follows life,” Hanssen said, saying that the structure of the country follows its lived practices and beliefs, and encouraged young people “to put more of their effort in the myriad of decisions and judgments and life adjustments necessary to sustain churches and families and a nation.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 4, 2013

Faithful in Thailand moved by Pope's words on Corpus Christi

Next Post

June 5, 2013 Advocate says fight to defend marriage in Illinois continues

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Why was Jesus' eating with tax collectors controversial?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They were wealthy They were healthy They were famous They were viewed as sinners