Marriage ruling raises questions of religious freedom

Last updated on: June 27, 2013 at 11:03 pm by CNA Daily News

Marriage ruling raises questions of religious freedom 2013-06-27T23:03:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jun 27, 2013 / 05:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- After the Supreme Court narrowly ruled that the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, religious leaders are highlighting the need to respect religious liberty in the United States.

Military Archbishop P. Timothy Broglio said in a June 26 op-ed that the Archdiocese of the Military Services “remains resolved in the belief that no Catholic priest will ever be compelled to condone – even silently – same-sex ‘marriages.’”

He stressed that “the Constitution guarantees that no endorsed minister will ever be compelled to perform a religious ceremony contrary to the dictates of his/her faith nor will today’s decision have any effect on the role and teaching ability of a priest or deacon in the pulpit, the classroom, the barracks or in the office.”

Questions over the protection of religious freedom were raised after the Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act that defined marriage as the union of one man and one woman for federal purposes.

In a 5-4 decision, the court majority ruled on June 26 that the law – also known as DOMA – treated same-sex “marriages” as “less respected than others” and so violated the Constitution’s guarantees of equal protection under federal law.

As a result of the ruling, there is no longer one single definition of marriage for federal purposes. Rather, individual states may continue to define marriage as they wish, and the federal government must accept the marriages acknowledged by each state. Currently, just 12 states and the District of Columbia have redefined marriage to include gay couples, but efforts are underway to push for a redefinition in other states throughout the country as well.

The ruling immediately prompted concerns over potential threats to religious freedom. Already, religious groups and individuals have come under pressure to affirm same-sex relationships as “marriages,” even if doing so violates their religious convictions.

In states that have legalized “gay marriage,” Catholic adoption agencies have been forced to shut down because they would only place children in homes with a married mother and father.

Religious individuals in professions ranging from bed-and-breakfast owner to photographer to baker have also faced lawsuits, fines and even threatened jail time for following the teachings of their faith on the definition of marriage.

Archbishop William E. Lori of Baltimore, who leads the U.S. bishops’ religious freedom committee, said the Supreme Court’s ruling poses “a serious threat to religious liberty and conscience rights for countless people of faith.”

Also of particular concern is religious freedom in the military, where chaplains have already reported harassment and threats of punishment for promoting and defending Church teaching on marriage.

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said in a statement that the “Department of Defense welcomes the Supreme Court's decision today on the Defense of Marriage Act.”

He added that the “Department of Defense intends to make the same benefits available to all military spouses – regardless of sexual orientation – as soon as possible. That is now the law, and it is the right thing to do.”

Chaplains and clergy within the armed services are members of the military and therefore federal employees within the Department of Defense. It is unknown how the court’s ruling will apply to military chaplains. When asked in a June 26 press conference how changes will be implemented, Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Martin Dempsey explained that the department will “assess what that means.”

Responding to the situation, Archbishop Broglio voiced hope in the Constitution’s protections of “free exercise of religion” which “ensure that no restrictions or limitations on the teaching of the Catholic faith will be placed on any Catholic priest or deacon in the armed forces.”

He further said that he is “confident that people of this great country, no matter the consequences, will continue to promote and defend the good and the truth of marriage as the union of one man and one woman as husband and wife for life.”

“Marriage remains what it has always been, regardless of what any government might say,” he stressed.

Previous Post

June 27, 2013

Traditionalists indicate definitive break with Catholic Church

Next Post

June 28, 2013 US bishops: court ruling cannot change essence of marriage

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

The righteous person will live by what quality or characteristic?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Obedience Works Holiness Faith