Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Global religious freedom law is ineffective, panel says

Global religious freedom law is ineffective, panel says

Last updated on: June 13, 2013 at 11:32 pm by CNA Daily News

Global religious freedom law is ineffective, panel says 2013-06-13T23:32:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jun 13, 2013 / 05:32 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Speaking before a congressional subcommittee, religious liberty experts warned that a U.S. law passed 15 years ago to promote international religious freedom needs stronger enforcement.

“This hearing is important because religious freedom is important: it is a pivotal human right that is both central to U.S. History and heritage and affirmed by international treaties and obligations,” said Dr. Katrina Lantos Swett.

“This hearing also is both important and timely given that religious freedom also is a practical necessity crucial to both the security of the U.S. and the world.”

Lantos Swett, who chairs the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom – an independent, bipartisan group that advises the government on global religious liberty matters – testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security on June 13.

She and other witnesses discussed the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which enshrined within U.S. foreign policy a commitment to condemn violations of religious liberty and assist other nations in promoting of religious freedom.

Witnesses argued that the law has been largely ineffective. They noted that the June 13 event marked the first hearing on the implementation of the law since it was passed.

Also discussed was the absence of Suzan Johnson Cook, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom. Although she had been invited and confirmed her availability, the State Department declined to make the ambassador available, citing a policy forbidding department employees from sitting on panels with members of non-governmental organizations.

However, the subcommittee’s chairman, Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), argued that high-ranking State Department officials, including Ambassador Johnson Cook, have sat on Congressional and private panels with non-governmental representatives on numerous occasions.

Thomas F. Farr, director of the Religious Freedom Project at Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, said that bureaucratic restraints prevent the ambassador from enacting significant policy changes.

He observed that the Ambassador for International Religious Freedom reports to a lower-ranking official and does not attend high-level State Department meetings.

Farr pointed to studies showing that “75 percent of the world’s population lives in countries where religious freedom is severely restricted.”

Although the promotion of religious freedom reflects our country’s principles and promotes our national interests – including U.S. security – it has not been a high priority for any of the recent presidential administrations, he said, pointing to a lack of evidence that efforts under the International Religious Freedom Act “have substantially improved the status of religious freedom in any country.”

He criticized structural deficiencies including a lack of diplomat training about why religious freedom is important and how to advance it.
Lack of respect

In addition, he noted a “diminution of religious freedom” within the U.S. government, saying that while historically, “religion in the public square was considered crucial for the health of democracy,” recent administrations have seen “religious freedom as a private matter, with few legitimate public purposes.”

Causes such as the “right to love” have received more attention and concrete action from the administration than religious freedom, which is largely respected in only rhetoric, he said.

Mahmood Ahmad, assistant national director of public affairs for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA, said the connection between religious freedom and global peace and security is underappreciated. He noted that “terrorists are often brainwashed into thinking that their acts have a religious purpose,” leading to severe human rights abuses around the globe.

Emphasizing the need to prioritize religious freedom in countries with persecution, Ahmad urged the State Department to empower the Ambassador for International Religious Freedom to enact changes based on department reports.

Panel members also called for an increased focus on religious freedom at the international level, through agencies such as the United Nations.

In addition, they stressed the need for institutional changes within the State Department, such as harsher sanction on countries that disrespect religious freedom, support for religious liberty advocates abroad and the reinstatement of a Special Adviser on International Religious Freedom to the National Security Council.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 13, 2013

Vatican diplomat: anti-drug policies should focus on family

Next Post

June 14, 2013 Newly-professed sisters celebrated as 'sign of hope'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible contains the Ten Commandments?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leviticus Genesis Exodus Numbers