Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Pro-life groups claim to be among IRS targets

Pro-life groups claim to be among IRS targets

Last updated on: May 17, 2013 at 10:02 am by CNA Daily News

Pro-life groups claim to be among IRS targets 2013-05-17T10:02:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., May 17, 2013 / 04:02 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Along with its targeting of conservative political groups for extra scrutiny, Internal Revenue Service employees also reportedly singled out pro-life leaders for intimidation.

As the IRS scandal continues to grow, news surfaced that two pro-life groups, Coalition for Life of Iowa and Christian Voices for Life, were withheld approval of tax exempt status.

“For both of those organizations there were inquiries from the IRS, there was delay, there were questions…which really infringed on First Amendment rights; they were asking them not to protest, not to assemble,” Sally Wagenmaker, special counsel with the Thomas More Society who assisted the groups, told CNA May 16.

Wagenmaker, who regularly works with non-profits as they seek tax exemption, affirmed that the Internal Revenue Service's treatment of the two groups was out of the ordinary, calling it “push back.”

“There was no sense of respect or according of good faith; there was an assumption that they weren't probably what they said they were, and in both cases asking if they were really legitimate.”

She explained that “the gate is supposed to be somewhat wide to get tax exempt status.”

“So as long as you're organized for a legitimate purpose, the IRS isn't going to ask too much about that purpose or your activities, except to the extent that there could be some financial corruption, or something that is truly abusive of the tax exempt status itself; but not the message that the tax exempt organization is carrying out.”

And yet, in a June 6, 2009 call to Coalition for Life of Iowa, an Internal Revenue Service representative told them to send the agency a letter stating that “they do not picket/protest or organize groups to picket or protest outside of Planned Parenthood,” and that their application for tax exemption would be approved upon receipt of that letter.

The IRS was “picking on this group” as if it “were protecting Planned Parenthood, so that definitely struck me as very strange,” Wagenmaker reflected.

When a group applies for tax exemption, they typically “sail through based on the application,” she said, unless “it's a very unusual thing they're doing, or their application is very poorly put together.”

Neither of these was the case for the Iowa group, she noted. “It was just fine, it was done by an attorney and had all kinds of information.”

“In my experience, the IRS ask things about money: are you abusing money, do you have some kind of conflict of interest, are you doing something that shows you're not really legitimately educational, charitable, or religious.” The questions about religious views are highly unusual, she said.

“I didn't see a point, on its face,” Wagenmaker said, of the invasive questions from the Internal Revenue Service. “Why would they even be asking them?”

“In both of these situations, through the additional questions being asked, it kind of insinuated or implied” that they were unworthy of trust.

“What was disturbing most was this was content based…getting into the religious nature,” and into the pro-life message of the groups.

Wagenmaker has said it shows “the IRS's disturbing ability” to stall and oppose legitimate applications through lengthy questionnaires and incorrect citations of applicable law.

“The application itself should have been it,” she said.

On May 10, the Internal Revenue Service apologized for subjecting conservative “tea party” groups to additional scrutiny. The agency asked some groups for donor lists, violating its own policies.

The so-called “IRS-gate” is among the topics Congress questioned Attorney General Eric Holder about May 15. Questioning also focused on the illicit seizure of phone records from the Associated Press by the Department of Justice, as well as the Sept. 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission at Benghazi in Libya.

The same day as Holder's questioning, Internal Revenue Service commissioner Steve Miller submitted his resignation to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew, who had requested it.

Pharmacists For Life International has also reported that at least two of its officers and board members were “subjected to ongoing harassment and intimidation attempts by the IRS through continued and costly nuisance audits and threatening letters over a period of months and years.”

The association of pro-life pharmacists said the two have “generally come away with clean audits” after “ugly threats of reprisal” from the agency.

And Protestant minister Franklin Graham has said the tax office selected for auditing two non-profits he heads, the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and Samaritan’s Purse.

Graham voiced concern that it was not a “coincidence” that the audit came after the organizations took out ads in support of the North Carolina marriage amendment and others which advocated that voters choose candidates using “biblical principles.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 17, 2013

Gay adoption bill could downsize Catholic agencies

Next Post

May 17, 2013 Pope's plan to visit Bonaria shrine thrills pastor

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many children did Job lose in the disasters at the beginning of the book?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ten Five Seven Twelve