Critics say Calif. infertility bill violates children’s rights

Last updated on: May 1, 2013 at 8:07 am by CNA Daily News

Critics say Calif. infertility bill violates children’s rights 2013-05-01T08:07:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Sacramento, Calif., May 1, 2013 / 02:07 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A California bill ensuring that health care coverage for infertility treatments would be provided to same-sex couples is a violation of the basic human right for a mother and a father, critics charge.

“What we're concerned about is sperm and egg donation in general, for the purpose of creating children,” Bill May, president of Catholics for the Common Good, told CNA April 30.

He said the practice deprives these children of “knowing and being cared for by their mother or father, or both. It's a violation of a fundamental human right, and it needs to be stopped.”

The bill, AB-460, amends California statute to say that “coverage for the treatment of infertility shall be offered and provided without discrimination on the basis of age, ancestry, color, disability, domestic partner status, gender, gender expression, gender identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.”

Health insurance policies in the state must already offer coverage for infertility treatment, except for in vitro fertilization. The bill will mandate that insurance plans for infertility cover same-sex couples and the elderly.

California statute determines infertility either by a condition recognized by a physician as a cause of infertility, or by “the inability to conceive a pregnancy or to carry a pregnancy to a live birth after a year or more of regular sexual relations without contraception.”

Because California considers any inability to conceive after a year of “regular sexual relations” to be “infertility,” no medical diagnosis is needed.

The bill has a hearing in the Committee on Health of the California State Assembly, the lower house of the legislature, on April 30. If passed, it will go to the Assembly floor and then to the Senate. The measure was authored by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, a Democratic representative from San Francisco.

Ammiano introduced the bill because “insurance companies are not complying with current state law that prohibits patients from being treated differently based on sex, marital status, and sexual orientation and current law that requires registered domestic partners to be treated as spouses in regard to fertility treatments,” according to a fact sheet from the California legislature.

Ammiano calls it discrimination that same-sex couples, even when the partners are physiologically fertile, not receive infertility coverage “based on not having an opposite sex married partner with whom to have one year of regular sexual relations.”

Carlos Alcalá, a spokesman for Ammiano, told The Weekly Standard that under the bill, “if a plan covers egg donation costs for a heterosexual couple unable to conceive without it, it would have to cover those costs for a gay male couple as well.”

The Capitol Resource Institute opposes the bill, claiming it would violate the freedom of religion, conscience, and thought of “many medical professionals and employers.” California's Catholic Conference also opposes the measure.

Existing legislation, which the bill not not meaningfully alter, ensures that employers and insurers who are or are owned by religious organizations, would not have to offer forms of infertility treatment “in a manner inconsistent with the religious organization's religious and ethical principles.”

May emphasized that the bill will contribute to the conception of children who are alienated from their biological parents, and that every child has a right to know and be cared for by his parents.

“This practice turns children into commodities, into objects for the fulfillment of adults,” he said.

“This practice, of creating children from sperm and egg donors, has consequences. It's an injustice to the child, depriving them of a fundamental human right.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 1, 2013

Newark archdiocese says media 'mischaracterizing' accused priest

Next Post

May 1, 2013 Obama's Planned Parenthood claims rejected by former employee

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened when Peter tried to walk on water?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He ran ahead of Jesus The Spirit descended upon him He led other disciples out He sank when he doubted