Critics slam drastic widening of morning-after pill access

Last updated on: April 5, 2013 at 9:11 pm by CNA Daily News

Critics slam drastic widening of morning-after pill access 2013-04-05T21:11:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Brooklyn, N.Y., Apr 5, 2013 / 03:11 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A federal judge's order to make the morning-after pill available without a prescription to people of any age has drawn sharp criticism and concern from public figures throughout the country.

“This is just a recipe for disaster,” Dennis Poust, communications director for the New York Catholic Conference, told CNA April 5.

In response to a lawsuit filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, a federal judge in Brooklyn, Edward Korman, ordered the FDA to make the morning-after pill available without a prescription to people of any age.

Spokesperson for the U.S. bishops' Secretariat for Pro Life Activities, Deirdre McQuade, said the ruling makes young girls more vulnerable to sexual predators as well as harmful side effects of the drug.

“The court's action undermines parents' ability to protect their daughters from such exploitation and from the adverse effects of the drug itself,” she said in an April 5 statement.

In Dec. 2011, Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled the Food and Drug Administration’s plan to make the drug available over the counter and with no age limits citing “significant cognitive and behavioral differences” between older adolescent girls and the youngest girls of reproductive age.

President Barack Obama voiced support for Sebelius' “common sense” decision saying that most other parents “would probably feel the same way.”

According to the judge’s comments, Sebelius' original decision to block access to the drug for children under 16 was “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.”

His ruling will allow people of any age to purchase the “emergency contraceptive,”which is a high dose of the synthetic progesterone hormone called levonorgestrel, without a prescription.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life called the judge's decision an opportunity for “big abortion industry to gamble with young girls’ health.”

“Equally troubling, this allows young girls pressured into sex or even abused by adults to be manipulated into taking pills that cover up what is a criminal act,” she said in a statement.

President of Susan B. Anthony List, Marjorie Dannenfelser, called Judge Korman's ruling “reckless” and said that it “denies girls the protection that comes along with the involvement of parents and doctors.”

Many opponents have raised the question of what this ruling will do to girls who could use the drug as a birth control routine instead of getting a prescription for the pill.

“I think we may see overuse to the point that a young girl may seriously have her health compromised as a result or even, God forbid, die because of misuse of these drugs,” Poust said.

Anna Higgins, director of the Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Center, said this ruling presents a “real danger” for the drug to be forced on young women and girls without their consent.

“The involvement of parents and medical professionals act as a safeguard for these young girls. However, today's ruling removes these commonsense protections,” she said in a statement.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 5, 2013

Venezuelan Cardinal encourages free and courageous vote

Next Post

April 5, 2013 Ecuador archdiocese to host prayer day for life and family

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Silver and gold have I none, but what I have I give to you"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter John James Paul