Law professor says pro-life views must lead to cultural action

Last updated on: January 29, 2013 at 11:03 am by CNA Daily News

Law professor says pro-life views must lead to cultural action 2013-01-29T11:03:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jan 29, 2013 / 04:03 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Americans who wish to be truly pro-life must be willing to examine the philosophical and cultural implications of these views, said George Mason University law professor Helen Alvaré.

Being involved in the pro-life movement, she said, “will lead you places where you’ll be surprised to go, because abortion is not a single issue.”

Alvaré delivered the keynote address at the Cardinal O’Connor Conference on Life on Jan. 26, explaining to participants that if they want to “keep the integrity” of their positions, they must be willing to take action on social and philosophical issues connected to abortion.

Hosted annually at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., the Cardinal O’Connor Conference for Life is the largest student-run pro-life conference in the United States.

Alvaré, who was speaking at the conference for the third time since it began in 2000, told the 650 student participants that being pro-life may lead them to investigate the modern understanding of human rights and freedom.

In typical human rights discourse, she observed, weakness and disability are seen as a reason to extend “greater care” to people, “not as a premise for their destruction.”

However, under current abortion laws, she noted, it is permissible for the vulnerable to be killed “when you’re killed by a member of your own family.”

Alvaré explained that this radical re-imagining of human rights hinges on a revised definition of freedom as action without imposition or inconvenience from anyone else. But this definition, she warned, would eventually “take us to a really, really sorry place” where any kind of human relation is seen as an imposition upon freedom.

Paradoxically, she noted, women do not walk into an abortion clinic “feeling empowered” or free, but rather feeling like they have no other options.

The assumption that motherhood is “unacceptable” has made women dependent on abortion, she said, and this dependence has been enshrined in U.S. laws and culture so deeply that the Supreme Court has said that “women cannot order their lives” without abortion on-demand.

A pro-life position will also lead one to reconsider the ethical, class and race issues surrounding abortion, Alvaré observed.

Abortion advocates such as Sandra Fluke and Cecile Richards present abortion as a tool for relieving the economic burden on poor and minority women, she noted, but in reality, the cultural misunderstanding of sex has harmed the poor.

“Sex is not just tennis,” Alvaré reminded the students, adding that sexual intimacy cannot be purely recreational.

Sex produces babies – a fact that is often ignored – and is also for bonding and forming relationships, she explained. After more than four decades of promoting unrestricted contraception and abortion, there are still troubling rates of single motherhood and women in poverty, she said.

Rather than empower women, Alvaré underscored, the push for free contraceptives and abortions has made the situation worse, contributing to increased levels of infidelity, sexually-transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies among poor and minority populations.

Both Republicans and Democrats have contributed to the current state of affairs by aggressively promoting domestic and international contraception programs, she added.

By equating “sexual expression” with freedom, she said, politicians gain “allegiance on the cheap,” while failing to address the real problems of unwed parenthood and severe economic crises.

The pro-life movement can benefit society, Alvaré said, through efforts to help members of all classes and cultures to “form stable families and take care of one another and their children.”

While acknowledging that such a commitment is not always easy, she added that each individual can make a difference in his or her daily life, simply by “going where a pro-life conviction takes you.”

Previous Post

January 29, 2013

Franciscan University president recalls students' joy as fondest memory

Next Post

January 29, 2013 Vatican official hopes legal dialogue will help persecuted Christians

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was King Zedekiah, and what did he do to anger God and ensure Jerusalem's fall?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He killed Jeremiah He burned the scroll He built an idol He rebelled against Babylon