US bishop calls for nuclear negotiations with Iran

Last updated on: December 20, 2012 at 9:20 am by CNA Daily News

US bishop calls for nuclear negotiations with Iran 2012-12-20T09:20:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Dec 20, 2012 / 02:20 am (CNA).- The U.S. bishops’ leader on international peace issues said that dialogue is the path to a peaceful resolution of nuclear concerns between the United States and Iran.

“Bold steps must be considered to counter this unfortunate and continually rising tide of aggressive posturing between our own nation and Iran,” said Bishop Richard E. Pates of Des Moines.

In a Dec. 18 letter to Thomas E. Donilon, national security advisor to the Obama administration, he explained that a “peaceful resolution will require direct, sustained negotiations over a considerable period of time.”

The bishop, who chairs the Committee on International Justice and Peace for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, voiced “deep concern” over the “dangerous situation facing our nation, the international community, and Iran.”

Speaking on behalf of his committee, he urged the U.S. to immediately begin direct negotiations with the nation in order to avoid further escalation.

“Initiating such talks should be done without preconditions and might include extending to Iran some relief from current international sanctions,” he said.

Bishop Pates pointed to “Iran’s resistance to credible restrictions on its enrichment activities under the terms of the Nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty” as a cause for concern. He also warned against “unjustified and unwise military action that could dramatically worsen an already critical situation.”

The justice and peace chairman reiterated Pope Benedict XVI’s call last year for “dialogue” and “joint solutions” concerning Iran.

A diplomatic resolution is needed, he stressed, “to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons capabilities while allowing them to enrich uranium for nuclear energy in compliance with international norms.”

Preventing military action is critical, the bishop emphasized, noting Catholic teaching that “serious moral and juridical questions” are raised by preventive wars when there is not “clear proof that an attack is imminent.”

He also pointed to analysts who have suggested that a preventive military strike on Iranian enrichment facilities could “lead to broader armed conflict that would likely engulf much of the Middle East.”

Bishop Pates referenced three elements that experts have identified as a necessary framework for resolution.

The international community should affirm Iran’s “right to enrich uranium” in exchange for an Iranian commitment to “limit enrichment convincingly short of weapons-grade potential as confirmed by verifiable inspections,” he said.

In addition, the United States and international community must offer credible security assurances that they will not initiate military action against Iran as long as the nation adheres to treaty obligations and “does not itself initiate attack.”

Iran should also be “assured access to international nuclear fuel cycle services at market rates.”

Bishop Pates recognized that negotiations regarding such an agreement will raise opposition, but stressed that a diplomatic solution is advantageous to all parties and preferable to military action that could yield dramatic and unforeseen results.

He urged the U.S. to vigorously pursue peaceful negotiations to resolve tensions between the two countries.

“The stakes are too high and the threats to human life too great to do less,” he said.

Previous Post

December 20, 2012

Bishops urged to imitate St. Thomas More in mandate fight

Next Post

December 20, 2012 Catholic convert and Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork remembered

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who killed his brother: Cain or Abel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cain Adam Abel Seth