Critics find UN contraception push harmful to women

Last updated on: November 23, 2012 at 11:03 pm by CNA Daily News

Critics find UN contraception push harmful to women 2012-11-23T23:03:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

New York City, N.Y., Nov 23, 2012 / 04:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A United Nations population report calling for global contraceptive access has drawn fire from doctors and pro-life advocates who say the funding would better spent preventing maternal deaths.

“A push to increase spending on contraceptives in developing countries by the United Nations Population Fund is at best misguided, and at worst harmful to women and families,” Dr. John F. Brehany, executive director of Catholic Medical Association, told CNA Nov. 15.

On Nov. 14, the United Nations Population Fund released its annual report on the “State of World Population.”

This year's report – titled “By Choice, Not By Chance” – links family planning to international development, declares it a global “right” for women, and calls for the removal of any social and financial obstacles to it.

UNFPA included some population control advocacy and depicted access to family planning as a “sound economic investment.” It also claims that the use of contraceptives will “improve” global health.

Dr. Brehany countered, however, that oral contraceptive pills “negatively impact women's health in significant ways – by increasing the incidence of breast cancer, strokes, and STDs.”

He also pointed out that an article in the January issue of 'The Lancet Infectious Diseases' found that the use of injectable contraceptives in Africa has been shown to double the risk of HIV infection.

“Women’s greatest needs,” he said, “are for education and healthcare resources for prenatal care, safe childbirth, and general health. Providing resources for natural methods of fertility awareness and regulation are not only cheaper than artificial contraceptives, they are better for women's health and for the stability of marriages.”

The UNFPA report summary said family planning is “almost universally recognized as an intrinsic right” that should be “available to all.” It said family planning should be promoted as “a right” which enables “a whole range of other rights.”

Wendy Wright, an official at the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute and former head of Concerned Women for America, called this “ludicrous.”

“The UN doesn't have the authority to declare contraception a human right, but particularly an agency of the UN doesn't have the right to declare something a human right; it debases the entire concept of human rights, to declare a commodity or a product a human right,” she said in a Nov. 15 interview with CNA.

“The UN hasn't declared food a human right, and yet we need food to survive. So its ludicrous to think that contraception would be a human right when the most necessary items for survival have not been considered human rights.”

Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute president, Austin Ruse, stated that “it is precisely such debasement of authentic human rights which puts people in the developing world in grave danger. Human rights are about freedom of religion, democratic self-determination, freedom of assembly.”

Wright considers the United Nations Population Fund's claim that “its products and services should be universally available and paid for by others” to be “crass self interest.”

She also pointed out that “many countries are experiencing depopulation. Sadly, the UNFPA does not recognize the current status of the world's population, and that the most serious problems are ones of depopulation, not over-population.”

The report further claims that meeting the need for family planning for its estimate of 222 million women who lack it would cost some $8.1 billion every year.

Wright said that in light of the current fiscal crisis being experienced by most nations, “right now seems to be a bizarre time for UNFPA to be claiming that its pet project ought to be getting an additional $8 billion a year.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 23, 2012

Vatican nativity set might include animals not at Jesus' birth

Next Post

November 24, 2012 Tulsa diocese celebrates Year of Faith with rich variety

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jacob’s only daughter?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rachel Dinah Tamar Leah