Court ordered to hear Christian college’s health care challenge

Last updated on: November 26, 2012 at 10:48 pm by CNA Daily News

Court ordered to hear Christian college’s health care challenge 2012-11-26T22:48:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Nov 26, 2012 / 03:48 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The Supreme Court has ordered a federal court of appeals to consider a Christian college's claim that its religious freedom is threatened by forced funding of abortion under the health care reform law.

“I am very pleased with the High Court’s ruling,” said Mat Staver, dean of Liberty University School of Law and founder of the nonprofit litigation group Liberty Counsel, which is representing the university.

The ruling “breathes new life into our challenge” to the Affordable Care Act, Staver said, asserting that mandated abortion funding under the law “collides with religious freedom and the rights of conscience.”

On Nov. 26, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Liberty Counsel’s petition to have its case reheard by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., allowing the possibility for the Supreme Court to ultimately hear the case within the next year.

The lawsuit, initially filed in 2010 on behalf of Liberty University and two private individuals, challenged both the mandate requiring individuals to obtain health insurance and a regulation requiring employers to offer health insurance to their workers.

In addition to challenging the authority of Congress to pass the Affordable Care Act, Liberty University argued that the law’s insurance exchange policies are unconstitutional because they “do not protect against payment for elective abortion coverage.”

The university charges that the law includes forced funding of abortion despite religious objections and therefore violates the First Amendment’s free exercise of religion protection and the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

As a Christian institution, Liberty University is morally opposed to abortion and does not cover it in its health care plan, the lawsuit explained.

It observed that under the health care reform law, states that provide for abortion coverage in health plans must segregate funds in order to ensure that no federal money received by a health care exchange can go towards abortions, with a few exceptions. This is in keeping with a law that prohibits the federal funding of most abortions.

However, such segregation is not required for non-federal funds received from individuals or employers enrolled in these health care plans, it noted. Therefore, money from those who religiously object to abortion may still be used to fund its coverage.

“Plaintiffs must choose between forced purchase of a private insurance product that does not protect their sincerely held religious beliefs or paying a punitive penalty for refusing to compromise their religious beliefs,” the lawsuit said.

The health care law has also raised considerable concern about freedom of religion due to its “preventive services mandate,” which requires employers including religious schools, hospitals and charitable organizations to offer coverage of contraception, sterilization and early abortion drugs.

More than 100 plaintiffs have filed lawsuits over the mandate, and the U.S. bishops have spoken out about the grave threat that it poses to religious liberty.

The Richmond appeals court initially refused to rule on the merits of the Liberty University case last year, arguing that it was premature under the federal Anti-Injunction Act because the penalty for refusing to purchase insurance had not yet taken effect.

However, the Supreme Court ruled in June 2012 that the Anti-Injunction Act does not apply to that portion of the health care law. The court upheld the individual mandate but did not rule on the employer mandate or the religious freedom concerns that are connected with it.

Liberty Counsel petitioned the high court to reopen its case and send it back to the court of appeals to consider these unresolved questions.

The court of appeals will now consider Liberty University’s argument that it “has a sincerely held religious belief that it should play no part in abortions, including no part in facilitating, subsidizing, easing, funding, or supporting abortions since to do so is evil and morally repugnant complicity.”

In its lawsuit, the university and individual plaintiffs asked the court to issue an injunction protecting them from being “forced to choose between their sincerely held religious beliefs about abortion and support of abortion and following a mandate of the federal government.”

Previous Post

November 26, 2012

Bishops say Colombians unaware of truth behind euthanasia law

Next Post

November 26, 2012 Catholics for a Free Choice spends millions in Latin American abortion support

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who follows the rider of the Pale Horse in Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Four Winds The Saints Hades The Angel Gabriel