Mo. business appealing ruling against its HHS mandate lawsuit

Last updated on: October 2, 2012 at 8:18 am by CNA Daily News

Mo. business appealing ruling against its HHS mandate lawsuit 2012-10-02T08:18:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

St. Louis, Mo., Oct 2, 2012 / 02:18 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A federal district court in Missouri has dismissed a Catholic businessman’s lawsuit that contends that the HHS mandate violates his religious freedom, but his lawyers say the decision is so flawed that it takes a position more extreme than the Obama administration and will not stand on appeal.

“Obviously we’re disappointed in this judge’s decision, but this is just the end of round one. No one expected that this case would end at the district court level, no matter who won,” Francis J. Manion, senior counsel with the American Center for Law and Justice, told CNA Oct. 1.

Manion said the businessman’s lawyers are “very optimistic” about success on appeal because “the basis of the court’s ruling is so remarkably flawed from a legal and logical statement that we don’t think the Court of Appeals will uphold it.”

“We’ve already filed our notice of appeal today,” he said.

The lawsuit was filed March 15 on behalf of Frank R. O’Brien and his 87-employee company O’Brien Industrial Holdings in St. Louis, Mo. He said his right to religious freedom is threatened by a federal Department of Health and Human Services mandate that requires most employers of 50 employees or more to offer health insurance plans that offer no co-pay coverage for sterilization and contraception, including drugs that can cause abortions.

District Judge Carol E. Jackson’s Sept. 28 decision rejected the idea that requiring “indirect financial support of a practice” constitutes “a substantial burden on a plaintiff’s religious exercise.”

The court said the Obama administration's rules “do not demand that plaintiffs alter their behavior in a way that will directly and inevitably prevent plaintiffs from acting in accordance with their religious beliefs.”

The plaintiffs are “free to exercise their religion, by not using contraceptives and by discouraging employees from using contraceptives,” the judge said.

The decision said the mandate “might” require the plaintiffs to subsidize activities they find objectionable “after a series of independent decisions” by health care providers and plan beneficiaries.

Manion rejected the court’s reasoning.

“The fact that the court held that being forced by the government to pay for something that violates your deep religious beliefs is not a burden on religious liberty is an extraordinary finding,” he said.

“It’s so extraordinary, in fact, that it’s a position the government itself doesn’t take,” he added.

Manion noted that the HHS mandate itself grants a religious employer exemption. The government’s recognition that the mandate infringes upon religious liberty is one reason such an exemption was created.

“That’s why the president and (Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen) Sebelius have been talking for months about their efforts to ‘balance’ religious liberty with the right of access to contraception, as they see it,” Manion said.

“The court’s position is something that the government itself has probably wished the court had not done,” he asserted. “To win a case on such a flawed basis is not a good thing for a lawyer, even if you’re the government’s lawyer. I think they’re probably regretting that that’s the basis of this decision here.”

The Becket Fund, a religious liberty legal group, says that over 30 federal lawsuits representing over 80 individual and institutional plaintiffs are presently challenging the HHS mandate.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 1, 2012

Scheduled execution put on hold in Pennsylvania

Next Post

October 2, 2012 EWTN novena begins with homily on spiritual aspect of religious freedom fight

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the cupbearer to the king who fasted and prayed for Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zerubbabel Ezra Haggai Nehemiah