Christian Bible publisher sues over HHS mandate

Last updated on: October 3, 2012 at 11:03 pm by CNA Daily News

Christian Bible publisher sues over HHS mandate 2012-10-03T23:03:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Oct 3, 2012 / 05:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A Christian Bible publisher has become the latest of nearly 100 plaintiffs to file a lawsuit challenging the federal contraception mandate over religious liberty violations.

“This action arises because the federal government has deemed devout publishers of the Bible to be insufficiently 'religious' to enjoy religious freedom in America,” said a federal lawsuit that was filed on Oct. 2.

The suit was filed on behalf of Tyndale House Publishers, a Christian publisher of Bibles and other Christian materials whose owners object to offering insurance coverage of early abortion drugs, which is required under the federal contraception mandate.

While the mandate includes a religious exemption, it applies only to non-profit organizations that exist primarily to inculcate religious values and employ and serve mainly members of their own faith.

For-profit businesses such as Tyndale are categorically deemed non-religious and fail to qualify for the religious exemption, even if they are created and run according to religious principles.

The lawsuit argued that the government’s “refusal to accommodate the conscience of Tyndale is highly selective.”

Leaders of the administration “cannot possibly claim they have a compelling interest to violate Tyndale's beliefs when they have voluntarily chosen to omit nearly two-thirds of the nation” for secular reasons, it said.

It explained how the company, which has 260 full-time employees, was started in 1962 by a Christian couple committed to running a business according to biblical principles.

These Christian beliefs are reflected in the company’s statement of purpose, core values and corporate goals, the lawsuit said, observing that “(e)very book Tyndale publishes has to have ministry value, otherwise it will not publish it.”

In addition, the executive team and board of directors pray together regularly and have done so for decades. The company holds a voluntary weekly chapel service, which is attended by more than half of employees, and donates 10 percent of its pre-tax profits to charity each year. It also holds monthly “build days” with Habitat for Humanity and sponsors annual mission projects for employees.

Furthermore, the lawsuit said, Tyndale “pays its employees well above minimum wage and provides them with excellent benefits,” including a strong health plan, bonus program and profit sharing plan.

The company is self-insured and has never covered abortions or abortion-inducing products, in keeping with its owners’ religious beliefs. It is exempt from the Illinois state requirement to cover early abortion drugs.

But when the company’s next insurance plan year begins in October 2012, it is required to cover the objectionable items or face crippling fines.

“The Mandate adopts a particular theological view of what is acceptable moral behavior with respect to provision of abortifacient coverage and imposes that view upon all adherents of religion who must either conform their consciences or suffer penalty,” the lawsuit argued.

The company is now asking for an injunction to block the enforcement of the mandate against it, arguing that its constitutionally protected right to free exercise of religion is being violated.

“Bible publishers should be free to do business according to the book that they publish,” said Matt Bowman, senior legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing Tyndale.

“To say that a Bible publisher is not religious is patently absurd,” said Bowman in a statement announcing the lawsuit. He argued that the case “is a prime example of how ridiculous and arbitrary the Obama administration’s mandate is.”

Under the mandate, religious employers must “choose between two poison pills: either desert your faith by complying, or resist and be punished,” he explained.

“Americans today clearly agree with America’s founders: the federal government’s bureaucrats are not qualified to decide what faith is, who the faithful are, and where and how that faith may be lived out,” he said.

Previous Post

October 3, 2012

Obama campaign accused of calls targeting Romney's Mormon faith

Next Post

October 4, 2012 Episcopal bishop gives Archbishop Cordileone frosty welcome

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group is known for its rejection of military service and political involvement?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amish Baptist Assemblies of God Methodist