Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Priest urges correct understanding of JPII’s ‘Theology of the Body’

Priest urges correct understanding of JPII’s ‘Theology of the Body’

Last updated on: June 1, 2012 at 6:07 pm by CNA Daily News

Priest urges correct understanding of JPII’s ‘Theology of the Body’ 2012-06-01T18:07:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jun 1, 2012 / 12:07 pm (CNA).- In a new guest column, Fr. Gregory Gresko discusses how a flawed interpretation of Blessed John Paul II’s seminal work on human sexuality can lead to a fundamentally wrong understanding of sex.

Known popularly as the “Theology of the Body,” the late Pope’s Catechesis on Human Love is “profoundly beautiful,” but at times “subject to misinterpretation,” warned Fr. Gresko.

In his column, the avid blogger, scholar and chaplain of the Blessed John Paul II Shrine in Washington, D.C., examines Christopher West’s newest book, “At the Heart of the Gospel: Reclaiming the Body for the New Evangelization.”

Fr. Gresko begins by calling West’s definition of lust problematic, as the author describes it in his new book as a “disorder of the heart.”

While this is certainly true, Fr. Gresko says, West falls short in his interpretation by failing to clearly define what is meant by “heart” and whether or not he fully takes into account human concupiscence – or “the tendency to sin.”

Fr. Gresko says West claims that “a more complete spousal understanding of the ‘body’ provides the key to rectifying the sinful diseases of the ‘heart.’”

But such an attitude, he writes, overlooks a human’s tendency towards sin, which is “objectively present in the body” even after Baptism.

The priest points out in his column that even the most virtuous saints “had to wage battle daily” against sin. Therefore, assuming that lust or other disorders of the heart can be completely removed from the spousal act, as West seems to suggest, is false.

In order to fully understand Bl. John Paul II’s works, one must realize that he often wrote and taught in terms of analogy, Fr. Gresko says.

He points out that in much of his work, West lacks “an adequate concept of analogy” while discussing spousal union.

“Understanding this latter concept analogically, the conjugal relation stands as an image pointing to the deeper reality of the Trinity, revealing God in our human world in a new and different way.”

Essentially, the family and the relationship between husband and wife on which it is founded, represents an “analogy of the Trinity” but not the Trinity itself.

Overemphasis on the sexual act can eclipse humanity’s relationship with God, which is first and foremost that of Father and child, he explains.

“As a child of God, man has a relationship with Him that then gives him the capacity to be in relation with another human being,” Fr. Gresko says.

In other words, the emphasis should always be on the individual and God and then the individual and the other.

West risks confusing Catholics in his emphasis of the conjugal act as the ultimate expression of union with God and by stating that “nothing is shameful.”

“West’s presentation fails to account adequately the positive aspects of shame,” which are found throughout the late Pope’s works.

Fr. Gresko says that such an oversight fails to bring enough attention to the fact that married couples can still struggle with lust, a teaching for which John Paul II received much criticism.

Overall, Fr. Gresko says, in order to properly interpret the “Theology of the Body,” the Magisterium should ensure that Bl. John Paul II’s teachings are “never used to condone searching for sexual satisfaction” by ways that are essentially “not conjugal” or that objectify the other spouse.

Although much clarification is necessary to properly “reclaim the body for the new evangelization,” he writes, Catholics have the necessary tools to do so through the teachings of Bl. John Paul II.

Read Fr. Gresko’s full article here.

Previous Post

June 1, 2012

Mary’s life reminds us to trust God’s plan, Pope says

Next Post

June 1, 2012 Brazil's Copacabana Beach, air force base to be main WYD sites

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Isaac's wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rebekah Sarah Rachel Leah