Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Catholic News

Home

Home
Catholic
Religion News
HHS mandate defender sees Catholic institutions as distractions

HHS mandate defender sees Catholic institutions as distractions

Last updated on: June 11, 2012 at 9:35 pm by CNA Daily News

HHS mandate defender sees Catholic institutions as distractions 2012-06-11T21:35:00+00:00 CNA Daily News

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Washington D.C., Jun 11, 2012 / 03:35 pm (CNA).- Washington Post columnist Anthony Stevens-Arroyo is a Catholic who does not believe the Obama Administration is attacking religious liberty by mandating Catholic institutions to pay for birth control in their employee health plans.

But he also doesn’t think the Church should even be in the business of operating universities, hospitals and other agencies that serve the public welfare.

“I believe it is a distraction and an imperfection in the Catholic Church for us to be running institutions like hospitals where the Church is receiving money, and has public obligations,” he said.

“I think that the Church running corporations, taking tax money, engaging in anti-union practices … I think all of that complicates the role of the Church as a beacon of truth. I would like the Church to return to its primitive state when the Church was not a part of any establishment.”

Stevens-Arroyo told CNA June 5 he would like to see Catholic universities “be restricted in terms of what is Catholic to the department of theology.”

“I don’t think you can bring Catholic thinking or Catholic thought into football teams or into the dorms of a frat house,” he said.

In his view, trying to do so creates “an intolerable tension” on Church responsibilities and leads to “huge compromises” in behavior, like monitoring the actions of students and faculty.

He believes his approach favors what he sees as the Church’s return to “the purity of the Gospel.”

Stevens-Arroyo is a religion scholar and a professor emeritus of Puerto Rican and Latino Studies at Brooklyn College. He also writes at the Washington Post’s “On Faith” section and at its “Catholic America” blog.

His comments come after 43 Catholic dioceses and institutions, including the University of Notre Dame, filed suit against the Obama administration challenging a mandate requiring that most employers provide coverage for sterilization and contraception, including some potentially abortion-causing drugs.

Stevens-Arroyo rejected the claim that the mandate is an “attack” on religious liberty. He contended that the mandate controversy is “a conflict between the religious rights of the employer and the religious rights of the employee.”

A Catholic university, he said, should not require faculty and students to abide by “moral rigidity” or it will face “the contradiction between running a corporation and preaching the gospel.”

He argued that there is a difference between “direct and indirect cooperation” in an immoral action.

The Church, in his view, would only be paying for insurance that covers contraceptives. The moral burden would be on the employee to choose whether to use it or not.

The U.S. bishops have rejected this distinction. In a March 7 memo, the U.S. bishops’ attorney, Anthony Picarello, argued that the Administration’s regulations still force an employer to fund and facilitate objectionable coverage of morally objectionable medications and procedures.

Under the regulations, any health care plan is a cause of employees’ access to “the ‘free’ coverage of objectionable items,” Picarello explained.

While Catholic institutions say they are being coerced, Stevens-Arroyo says they are the ones trying to coerce their employees to go along with the Church’s moral teaching.

Stevens-Arroyo believes that the HHS mandate is “still in negotiation” and predicted that its final form will only affect entities that accept tax money, including universities that accept federal monies for student loans, and not any religious non-profits that are self-funded.

The mandate presently affects almost all employers with 50 employees or more, regardless of whether they receive taxpayer funding.

The Catholic bishops have warned that the regulation could force Catholic schools, hospitals and charitable agencies around the nation to close down.

Previous Post

June 11, 2012

Mexico City archdiocese decries profanation of Corpus Christi procession

Next Post

June 11, 2012 Eucharistic Congress opens with reflection on 'treasure of the Church'

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Americas Asia - Pacific Europe Middle East - Africa Uncategorized US Vatican

Select a Month November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the Christian principle about judging by appearances?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Do not judge by outward appearance See clothes first Judge quickly Copy others' opinions