Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Catholic Authenticity

Is Progress a Religion?

Last updated on: March 30, 2017 at 1:54 pm   by Melinda Selmys

Is Progress a Religion? 2017-03-30T13:54:58-04:00 Melinda Selmys

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

door-2099446_1280

“The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected.”

– G. K. Chesterton

There’s an article over at Crisis today called the “Priesthood of the Transgendered.” Dealing with all of the problematic claims that the article makes would take several blog posts, but I would like to choose this one: the fairly routine claim of religious conservatives that secular liberalism has made a religion out of “progress.”

This is not actually true. There is no such thing as a religion of progress. Nor, for that matter, is there such a thing as a religion of traditionalism.

What there is, is a very simple fact of human psychology. All humans like progress when we feel that we are moving in the right direction. If you’re sure that you’re on the right road, and you’re looking forward to reaching your destination, it is very natural to want to get there sooner. Your foot itches on the accelerator, and the speed limit seems like an unjust imposition. If you think you made a wrong turn, you naturally slow down and start looking for a good place to turn around.

Politics is no different. In the last couple of months, we’ve seen a substantial shift in American politics towards the triumph of a right-wing agenda. For folks on the right, the speed at which Donald Trump is moving to bring about the accomplishment of their goals is a cause for celebration. When the checks and balances in the American constitution move to put the brakes on – to conserve the present political order from too-rapid change – this produces frustration and irritation. Far from wanting a conservative GOP presidency, the contemporary Right wants rapid and revolutionary progress towards the fulfillment of their agenda.

The Left, on the other hand, has started settling into a decidedly nostalgic frame of mind. I’ve seen dewy-eyed “progressives” posting memes about how much they miss the Bush era. “Have you seen his paintings of vets?” “Did you ever consider how maybe his seemingly “stupid” comments might have been the result of age-based neurological problems?” Good old George W. Those were the days, my friend. Those were the days.

This is because humans are not actually either progressive or conservative, and neither are political ideologies. The truth is that all of us will want to maintain the status quo in so far as it is working for us and for those that we sympathize with. All of us also want to change the status quo in so far as it is making us uncomfortable or is hurting those we love. If things seemed better in the old days, we will pine for them. If the future looks bright, we will move forward with optimism.

This is not a product of ideology or political belief, it’s just how humans work. To believe that what the Left wants is “progress,” without understanding that there are genuine moral goals that they are progressing towards, is to make a fundamental error not only about the motivations of a large group of people but also about human nature itself.

Those on the left who have championed gay rights and trans rights have not, for the most part, done so because they want to undermine the traditional bases of our civilization or because they have a mindless love of progress for progress’ sake. I don’t deny the existence of extremists who see “transgression” as a positive value in itself, or who think that Western society is fundamentally bankrupt. These people do exist, they do have influence and they do have followers. But they’re kind of the equivalent of folks on the Right who think that the belief that A=A logically leads to the acceptance of Ayn Rand’s elitist libertarianism.

LGBTQ rights are actually derived from a very simple set of moral premises which actually have very deep roots in Western, and particularly American, culture. First, the belief that individual human beings have a right to be loved, affirmed and supported on the basis of their essential humanity, rather than on the basis of external traits including moral respectability. This premise is one of the key, distinctive tenets of the Western tradition. It is immediately derived from the teaching and example of Christ in the gospels, though it seems to have had some antecedents in Roman and Greek thought particularly among the Stoics.

Second, the belief that human beings have a right to freely define and pursue their own ideals without facing violence, discrimination or legal obstruction should those ideals come into conflict with the beliefs of the majority. This is one of the central concerns which defines modern constitutional republicanism: the rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” are supposed to be guaranteed over and against the potentially violent prejudices of mob rule. Offering people the liberty to choose the type of long-term relationships or gender presentation that they believe will make them happy really does just seem like a very natural extension of the basic values of modern Western civilization — values which, whether you like them or not, lie at the foundation of American society.

Pretending that there is some kind of religion of progress, that its goal is to undermine the fundamental values of our culture, and that trans people are its new priesthood, allows religious conservatives to avoid honest engagement with the actual issues. It creates a straw-man that can easily be turned into a burnt offering. But it doesn’t get us anywhere, because it fails to engage with the fact that actually most liberals are not incoherent moral relativists who reject Christianity, Aristotle, Right Reason and the American Constitution.

The truth, which is much more challenging, is that actually the divisions in contemporary society are driven by sincere and authentic disagreements about how our cultural traditions ought to be interpreted and upheld. Until both sides of the political divide are willing to recognize this, and to have reasonable and responsible dialogue based on the assumption of mutual intelligence and good will, we will have neither peace nor justice. Rather, we will continue to see the creation of factitious political divisions which can only be resolved by the application of an increasingly arbitrary and dangerous will to power.
Stay in touch! Like Catholic Authenticity on Facebook:

Catholic Authenticity

Current Events

Aristotle

Ayn Rand

Crisis Magazine

G.K. Chesterton

George W.

LGBTQ rights

neither left nor right

politics

progress

Right Reason

Stoicism

Trump

Western tradition

Previous Post



March 29, 2017

To All You Whiny Snowflakes Who *Need* an Epidural

Next Post



April 5, 2017 A Cure For What Fails Ya: The Legacy of Sexual Orientation Change Therapies


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abuse Beauty Charity Chastity Current Events Faith Family Feminism Fiction Humility Humour Identity Justice Perseverence Philosophy Poverty Sexuality trauma Uncategorized Virtues Wombats

Select a Month February 2020 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who stopped David from taking revenge on Nabal?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abigail Jonathan Michal Ahinoam

Books by This Author Books by Melinda Selmys

See All Titles »

Support this
Column

Related posts from Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

The Power of Negative Thinking: On Trauma and...

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Do You Feel Safe in Church?

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Just Believe Women?

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Is There A Gay Problem in the Priesthood?

Catholic Authenticity

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube