Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Catholic Authenticity

World Table: New Commenting System Coming to Catholic Authenticity

Last updated on: October 26, 2015 at 11:44 am   by Melinda Selmys

World Table: New Commenting System Coming to Catholic Authenticity 2015-10-26T11:44:30-04:00 Melinda Selmys

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

playmobil-451203_1920

Patheos is trying out a new commenting system, and I’ve agreed to be among the guinea pigs.

The new system is called “World Table,” and the basic idea is that it’s designed to create more productive conversation by rewarding positive, respectful, helpful and amusing contributions – and by penalizing obnoxious com-box behaviours like trolling and sealioning.

It uses a more sophisticated user-feedback system than Disqus, and the feedback makes a difference in terms of people’s ability to participate in the conversation. If someone’s contributions consistently receive negative feedback from others in the commenting community, then, over time, that person will build up a bad reputation on the system. The site administrator (that would be me) gets to decide on a minimum ranking that person has to have in order to be welcome to participate in the com-box.

The way it works is that readers will be invited to evaluate comments using four criteria: respectful, helpful, honest and likeable. These criteria were selected because they don’t have anything to do with whether you like, or agree with, the content of a person’s answer – they’re concerned with whether the comment contributes positively or negatively to the tone of the com-box. The hope is that this will foster productive dialogue between people who hold different views, and that it will discourage rude, dismissive, irrelevant and unproductive comments.

The benefit here is threefold. First, it means that if a person gets blocked, they got blocked because of their own choices and the choices of the community. It wasn’t my decision. This means that I don’t have to worry that disruptive com-boxers are going to be hurt, or worse, spiteful if I block them – because it’s out of my hands. It also means that if someone does get blocked, they’ll know that it wasn’t just because I happened to find them personally irritating.

Second, it should ideally function as a means for greater self-reflection and self-correction. It’s not like anyone is going to just suddenly find themselves cut off from the com-box – if a commenter is getting bad ratings, they’ll be able to see why, and they’ll have the opportunity to improve. Also, the rating system will always be right there when you’re composing a comment, so it will serve as a reminder to be respectful, helpful, honest and friendly. I don’t know how other people will feel about that, but I know that I do sometimes get frustrated in com-box discussions and I end up giving responses that are snappish, uncharitable or unkind – and then later regretting that I did so. Having a built-in reminder that I need to be accountable, even in the heat of a disagreement, will be a definite concrete help in making sure that my own behaviour contributes to building the kind of discussion that I want to see.

Finally, the hope is that this will help to create a safer and more welcoming commenting community. I know a lot of people avoid com-boxes because they’ve had too many experiences with toxic com-box behaviours and they just don’t want to expend the emotional energy required to deal with trolls and assholes. Unfortunately, this means that people with honest questions or intelligent contributions often end up censoring themselves, and the discussion becomes dominated by folks who want a forum to air their own opinions but who are not interested in respectful discussion. One of the goals of this commenting system is to create an environment where more people will feel that they can safely add to the conversation.

The new system should be in place sometime over the next couple of days. I invite readers to share their feedback on it with me so that I can pass that information along to the people responsible for developing it. Also, if you have more detailed questions about how it works you can check out the World Table website, and hopefully your questions will be answered there.

Happy commenting!

picture credit: pixabay

Uncategorized

com-box

comments

Patheos

sealioning

trolls

World Table

Previous Post



October 24, 2015

Work Without Representation: Giving Power to Women in the Church

Next Post



October 26, 2015 Oriented Towards Beauty


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abuse Beauty Charity Chastity Current Events Faith Family Feminism Fiction Humility Humour Identity Justice Perseverence Philosophy Poverty Sexuality trauma Uncategorized Virtues Wombats

Select a Month February 2020 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I sent an army of singers before my army, and God set ambushes against our enemies. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hezekiah Jehoshaphat David Asa

Books by This Author Books by Melinda Selmys

See All Titles »

Support this
Column

Related posts from Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Moderation Problems

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Why Am I Still Writing For Patheos Catholic?

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Mommy Wars vs. Culture Wars Fight

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Selective Skepticism

Catholic Authenticity

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube