Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Catholic Authenticity

Planned Parenthood: Wait a Second. Isn’t That An Oxymoron?

Last updated on: September 14, 2015 at 1:04 pm   by Melinda Selmys

Planned Parenthood: Wait a Second. Isn’t That An Oxymoron? 2015-09-14T13:04:29-04:00 Melinda Selmys

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Barbara'sFlowers

One of the things that I really loved about Laudato Si was the way that Francis focuses on the beauty of the created order – and specifically the fact that its wild and creative fecundity is part of its beauty. Like Benedict and John Paul II before him, he criticized the rise of a toxic technocracy that tries to instrumentalize creation in accord with the needs of a highly efficient modern industrial society. And like those other Popes, he sees a link between the ecology of the natural world and the human ecology: the way that we treat and interact with our own bodies.

Parenthood is possibly one of the areas that is most stricken by this mania for planning. In our present culture we generally assume that pregnancies are supposed to be planned and that an unplanned pregnancy is a kind of personal failure, even a catastrophe. I’m not talking here about situations where having a child is a genuine trial – where there are factors like extreme poverty, lack of a stable relationship, serious health risks or rape involved. I’m talking about people in stable families with a stable incomes and reasonable accommodations.

The family size is planned. The timing of the children is planned. Everything is supposed to fit into a schedule. And when things go wrong, people go bonkers.

Here’s the problem: things go wrong. They just do. Parenthood is a creative process, and like all creative processes it involves a large quantity of inherent chaos. (Apparently there have been actual studies done showing that messy spaces lead to more creative thinking – which is my justification for the state of my house.)

Creativity is not regimented, it’s effusive. Yes, you have to try to assert some sort of control over it or it you will be literally overrun, but if you over-control it or micro-manage it, you will end up either killing the creative process or you will end up driving yourself insane.

A significant number of people literally choose not to have children because they think of a baby primarily as a source of chaos and inconvenience. The “child-free” often write about how liberating it is not to have to plan their lives around an infant — or rather, not to have their plans for their lives disrupted by the realities of parenting.

Most people, however, want to have kids but they want to have them in a way that is controlled and managed. So they have one or two (maybe three – there’s been a recent move towards acknowledging that “sibling love” may be important to a child’s development). Then they micro-manage, they sleep train, they set up “play dates,” and they hover over their children like obsessive spy-copters with radar trained to detect anything that might cause bumps or stains.

And they drive themselves nuts. Literally, nuts.

It’s not that these women are bad, crazy, or obsessive people, it’s that they’ve been taught an ideology which says that the only kind of responsible parenthood is planned parenthood. And if you think the planning is going to stop when the baby is conceived on schedule, think again. One of the fruits of a society where people only have 1-2 kids is that parents feel the need to perform up to a very high set of (often arbitrary) expectations.

After all, when a resource is scarce, competition is inevitable.

I don’t attend mommy groups because I’ve heard enough of the horror stories from women who do, but I’ve seen it even at the park. It’s not so bad out here in the country where I live, but if I’m in the city it’s like there’s a weird competition between the mothers to show who is parenting the most responsibly. Who planned ahead? Who brought the most bags full of snacks and drinks and sunblock and extra clothes? Who is teaching her 18 month old to count while pushing him on the swing?

It’s vicious, and God forbid that you should show up with a horde of children dressed like they just stepped off the set of Blake’s 7. God forbid that you should have more children than you can actually physically helicopter at one time. Clearly, if your child is more than five inches away from you for more than thirty seconds it’s because you’re neglectful. The child could trip and skin his knee, or bump his head, or some other unspeakable horror that should never befall a human being. You should have planned for this – before you got yourself pregnant with more kids than you could handle.

The thing is, micro-parenting isn’t very rewarding. It’s psychologically exacting, and most of the exaction is at the expense of the mother. Ironically, the very enslavement to domestic tedium that feminism fought so hard to eradicate has become a psychological necessity in the age of contraception. Whether it’s the birthday-party cupcake-decorating one-upmanship or the need to schedule your child’s life so heavily that you can never have one of your own, women have been pushed into an absurd standard of “planned” child-rearing that literally stifles the soul.

Being open to life means being open to its randomness, its chaos, its vicissitudes, its creativity. It means allowing the wild profusion of God’s grace to overwhelm the boundaries of your own plans. It means letting go, surrendering, not in order to become a slave to your uterus but in order to be set free from enslavement to your own anxieties, expectations and need for control. It means, in short, allowing the exuberant beauty of the wilderness to overwhelm your limited schemes so that you can enjoy your place in the natural order as a creative creature giving birth to the effusive tumult of life.

Just as a note, because someone is going to take offence in the com-box, my analysis does not belittle, demean or otherwise stigmatize women who have only a few children because they cannot have more than that. Women who are able to have only a couple of children (whether for physiological reasons, or economic ones, or because their partner flatly refuses to have more) are not generally suffering from a need for hyper-regulation. Rather, they are at the mercy of circumstances that they cannot control. In my experience, women in this position are delightful – they know that they may only be a mother once, and so they undertake it with a kind of reverence and gratitude that can be instructive to the overwhelmed mother-of-six. They’re even lovely when obsessively decorating cupcakes.

Photo credit: Melinda Selmys

Family

child-free

creativity

family planning

helicopter parenting

large family

Laudato Si

my children ate my brain

open to life

parenting

Previous Post



August 3, 2015

Holy Moral Relativism Batman!

Next Post



August 5, 2015 The Folly of Intellect: A Demon's Reflections


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abuse Beauty Charity Chastity Current Events Faith Family Feminism Fiction Humility Humour Identity Justice Perseverence Philosophy Poverty Sexuality trauma Uncategorized Virtues Wombats

Select a Month February 2020 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Paul The Spirit Jesus (to the church in Laodicea)

Books by This Author Books by Melinda Selmys

See All Titles »

Support this
Column

Related posts from Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Get Behind Me, Tony Esolen: Stop Making Marriage...

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

8 Ways Catholics May Enable Domestic Abuse

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

Sexual Coercion and Spousal Rape: What the Church...

Catholic Authenticity

Catholic

PSA: NFP is Not Compatible With Alcoholism or...

Catholic Authenticity

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube