Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Caryn Riswold

Home
Progressive Christian
Because Religion?

Because Religion?

Last updated on: August 25, 2014 at 8:00 am by Caryn Riswold

Because Religion? 2014-08-20T14:46:19-06:00 Caryn Riswold

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Consider this:

George Fox University decided that references to sex in Title IX don’t include gender identity. The Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education says it does.

Hobby Lobby owners decided that IUD’s are abortifacients. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology says they are not.

On what basis did the private Christian university and the incorporated craft store make their requests for exemption to federal law? Not better science or better sociology; Because religion.

I ask: Who gets to interpret, define, and implement Title IX? Who ought to be listened to on the science of contraceptive devices?

Not George Fox University. Not Hobby Lobby.

I surely don’t understand how a corporation can exercise religious freedom. And I’m trying to understand religious exemptions to Title IX.

A lot has been written about Hobby Lobby and the flaws in the court’s decision earlier this summer, how it enshrines corporate personhood’s religious freedom, and how it disproportionately burdens female employees by creating potential barriers between them and federally provided healthcare.

Less is known about what is going on with requests for religious exemptions to Title IX, particularly in terms of transgender students.

Jayce Here’s a summary of the George Fox case from the Title IX Blog earlier this summer:

George Fox University is a Christian institution in Oregon that was founded on Quaker principles. In April, it denied a transgender student named Jayce M. the right to live in on-campus housing consistent with his male gender identity, offering him instead the opportunity to live with other men in off-campus housing if certain conditions were met. With the help of attorneys, Jayce filed a Title IX complaint with the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, arguing that the decision discriminated against him on the basis of gender identity. The complaint seemed poised to allow OCR the opportunity to give effect to the broad, trans-inclusive definition of sex discrimination that it has lately been espousing, such most recently in its guidance on sexual assault. But instead, OCR has granted a religious exemption to George Fox that has effectively immunized the institution from Jayce’s Title IX challenge.

Jayce is appealing the Department’s decision.

Title IX apparently does include within it a narrowly defined religious exemption for institutions that are controlled by a religious organization (“not just a private school with a certain religious tradition,”) and who have specific religious tenets that would conflict with application of the law. The Title IX Blog notes that it is difficult to see how George Fox fits either of these criteria, given its status as a “public benefit” nonprofit corporation, instead of a religious nonprofit. It is not controlled by a religious organization, rather it seems to fit the model of a church-related university with a strong mission and identity connected to its religious heritage. This is in contrast to an institution like Notre Dame University, for which it is easy to understand what religious organization controls it.

When examining the religious tenet angle, we find a fundamental problem with loosening criteria for religious exceptions. An article in PQ Monthly includes dissenting interpretation of Quaker theology from two local pastors who support Jayce in his appeal:

“The theological framework of our Faith & Practice affirms the inherent dignity of all people, regardless of their gender identity:

We witness to the dignity and worth of all persons before God. We repudiate and seek to remove discrimination based on gender, race, nationality, or class. … (Faith Expressed through Witness: 11).

The same Faith & Practice urges us to consider: Do you speak out for justice and morality, and against oppression, exploitation, and public wrong? Do you recognize the equality of persons regardless of race, gender, or economic status (The Queries #18: 13)?

Based upon these theological convictions, we ask George Fox University to honor the housing requests of its transgender students. Let us follow the example of Jesus Christ, and extend hospitality to those who might otherwise be unsafe and unwelcome in our communities.”

There seems to be genuine disagreement within the Quaker tradition about its religious tenets. There isn’t, in fact, an official doctrine or teaching that GFU is pointing to on which its exemption should be based. They point to their tradition. A contrasting example would be the religious tenet of the Roman Catholic Church that women not be priests, or that contraception not be used. These are certainly contested ideas among Catholics, and yet the Church has an official position that it can promote and enforce via the institutions it controls.

So, not only is George Fox not “controlled by a religious authority” in the same way as a Notre Dame, the “religious tenets” it claims as a basis for exemption from federal law don’t seem to exist outside their own interpretation of the Quaker tradition.

The land of religious exceptions creates these problems in the first place. Should we still have them? Perhaps, with very strict and very narrow application. Unfortunately, Hobby Lobby and now George Fox University have set precedents that enshrine flawed reasoning and privilege the religion of the powerful in ways that disadvantage the already marginalized.

Jayce pic via.

george fox university

Previous Post

August 21, 2014

Teaching Ferguson

Next Post

September 2, 2014 postChristian & the Sin of postFeminism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion At the Intersections Atheism Christianity Contraception Education Feminism Gender Getting Theological Honorable Mention Islam LGBT News Our Voices Race Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is described as the "son of encouragement" and traveled with Paul?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mark Silas Luke Barnabas