Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Caryn Riswold

Home
Progressive Christian
Pluralism, Marriage, & Religious Freedom

Pluralism, Marriage, & Religious Freedom

Last updated on: September 30, 2013 at 8:30 am by Caryn Riswold

Pluralism, Marriage, & Religious Freedom 2013-09-26T10:04:15-06:00 Caryn Riswold

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The following is an excerpt from a commentary I wrote for my local newspaper, the Jacksonville Journal-Courier, published last week. The picture to the right is a historic one of our actual intersection of Church and State streets. This commentary brings together the ongoing struggles for marriage equality in the state of Illinois with some reflections on religious pluralism by Eboo Patel, who is speaking on my campus today.

Church intersects with state all over the place in our lives and in American history. To pretend that it doesn’t or to imagine that Thomas Jefferson’s “wall of separation” actually exists is to not comprehend contemporary politics, or U.S. history for that matter.

Consider some of the strongest opposition to a Catholic Kennedy presidency in 1960: Religious.

Consider some of the strongest resistance to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate: Religious.

Consider the most vocal opposition to marriage equality for gay and lesbian Americans: Religious.

In his 2012 book, Sacred Ground: Pluralism, Prejudice and the Promise of America, Eboo Patel argues that the United States is still attempting to live out the dream of pluralism found even among its slave-owning founders. Despite our collective history of violence, conflict and hateful rhetoric that persists today, Patel suggests that the forces of pluralism have defeated the forces of prejudice time and again. He’s both idealistic and pragmatic about this:

“Pluralism is not a birthright in America; it’s a responsibility. Pluralism does not fall from the sky; it does not rise up from the ground. People have fought for pluralism. People have kept the promise.”

We the people have work to do. Right now, the Illinois State Legislature is considering SB-10 “to provide same-sex and different-sex couples and their children equal access to the status, benefits, protections, rights and responsibilities of civil marriage.” The reasons why this law is needed are simple. The advocacy group Illinois Unites for Marriage describes it plainly: “Same-sex couples want to marry for the same reasons all couples do — to protect their families and enter into a lifetime commitment of shared responsibility. All families benefit from the security marriage brings.” If you agree, contact your state legislators now.

When opponents to same-sex marriage make their arguments, they inevitably wind up back at their own religion and their own interpretation of sacred texts. This is when it seems easy to forget that we do not make laws based on sacred texts in this country. We forget that, because church and state intersect everywhere and we’ve stopped realizing when it’s not a good thing.

For this reason, perhaps, the title of this bill, passed by the Illinois State Senate and now under consideration in the Illinois House of Representatives, is “The Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act.” The sponsors even put “religious freedom” in the title before “marriage fairness.” Illinois Unites offers this description of why that matters:

“[The act] protects religious freedom, ensuring that all faiths will decide which marriages can be consecrated within their tradition. The religious exemption language in the bill is very clear: It is and always will be up to each church to decide whom to marry based on their beliefs. No church will ever be forced to recognize a relationship it does not want to.”

I believe all faith traditions should recognize the dignity in loving relationships between two consenting adults and should advocate for their legal protection and recognition. I understand, however, that I’m not allowed to force my beliefs on my neighbor. In the same way, I do not want my neighbor (or my legislator) forcing her beliefs on me.

My faith tradition values, respects and, yes, sanctifies loving, committed relationships, regardless of the gender of the two people involved. My faith tradition also understands that my decisions about contraception and reproductive health care are best made by me, my husband and our health care providers. And my church understands that interreligious dialogue and cooperation are essential tools for creating a better, more just world.

For the full commentary, head over to the Journal-Courier website.

Illinois Unites for Marriage

Previous Post

September 27, 2013

Transitioning in Christian Community: H. Adam Ackley & APU

Next Post

October 3, 2013 Apply Now: Faith & Reproductive Justice Institute

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion At the Intersections Atheism Christianity Contraception Education Feminism Gender Getting Theological Honorable Mention Islam LGBT News Our Voices Race Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Jeremiah was known as the weeping prophet.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE