Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Caryn Riswold

Home
Progressive Christian
Even If He’s Not Your Son, He’s Still Human

Even If He’s Not Your Son, He’s Still Human

Last updated on: March 27, 2013 at 8:30 am by Caryn Riswold

Even If He’s Not Your Son, He’s Still Human 2013-03-26T10:19:14-06:00 Caryn Riswold

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It shouldn’t take a gay son to convince a senator to support marriage equality.

Like many people, I was pleased to see Rob Portman from Ohio become the first sitting Republican senator to publically state his support for marriage equality. I was relieved last year when Barack Obama finally completed his own public and self-described evolution on marriage equality, even though I think it took too long. And Hillary Clinton only just recently stated her unequivocal support for gay rights as human rights. Better late than never.

But there’s one element of the Portman story that just bugs me. He only came to this conclusion after his son, Will Portman, came out to his family and they started talking about the issue. Now, I know, this is a good news story all around, right? Honesty and trust, supportive parents, a young man who can finally say: “That was the beginning of the end of feeling ashamed about who I was.”

Here’s my problem: You shouldn’t have to rely on a child, a sibling, a friend, a neighbor, or even a stranger to convince you to support their human rights. They’re human beings. Shouldn’t that be enough?

I know. It does matter. Stories matter. On this issue and a whole host of others. There’s even a ‘contact hypothesis’ developed and studied by psychologists who convincingly argue that contact among people is one of the most effective means of reducing prejudice. Stories are a key means of contact. That’s why there are campaigns like the 1 in 3 Campaign from Advocates for Youth, which offers women a safe platform to tell their stories of choosing abortion. Humanizing these issues matters. It’s about ending stigma and replacing silence with story, replacing a nameless, faceless, other with the face and heart and life of someone that you know and love. I get it.

And yet …

Stassa Edwards over at the Ms. Magazine blog writes about how this type of relational thinking is often used when talking to young men about rape. In response to the case in Steubenville, Ohio, where two young men have now been convicted of rape, she describes the video recording of the events:

At one point, former Steubenville baseball player Michael Nodianos says, “It isn’t really rape because you don’t know if she wanted to or not.” At another point an unidentified boy asks “What if that was your daughter?” Nodianos responds, “But she isn’t.”

Nodianos’s words are telling, because for too long we’ve been teaching our sons to think of the consequences of rape within a familial context (i.e. “Imagine if it were your wife/daughter/mother”) and it’s clear that this method of education is a complete and total failure. Boys shouldn’t be taught that only women to whom they are genetically bound are worthy of being treated as human beings because, in part, that implies those who are not family are subhuman and therefore deserving of their own victimization. Nodianos’s justifications (akin to “she never said no”) and answers might be chilling, but they’re also relatively rational responses to the phrases we repeat to boys and consider enough education.

If we say that people can only understand an issue when they know someone affected by it, we let people who haven’t heard a story or think they don’t know someone off the hook. And that’s not okay. In fact, relying on other people to educate you about their oppression is an old and dangerous tactic.

In her brilliant 1979 essay, “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle The Master’s House,” Audre Lorde described how this dynamic repeats itself across lines of gender and race.

Women of today are still being called upon to stretch across the gap of male ignorance and to educate men as to our existence and our needs. This is an old and primary tool of all oppressors to keep the oppressed occupied with the master’s concerns. Now we hear that it is the task of women of Color to educate white women — in the face of tremendous resistance — as to our existence, our differences, our relative roles in our joint survival. This is a diversion of energies and a tragic repetition of racist patriarchal thought.

This seems to be the dynamic at work today in the happily-ended Portman family narrative: It remains the responsibility of gay and lesbian people to explain to their straight friends and family that, in fact, they are human beings deserving of equal protection under the law.

We should be grateful for all those who have shared their stories, and we should stop expecting that they do so.

Whatever the outcome of the Supreme Court cases being heard this week, we will really have made social and political progress in this country when we stop relying on the marginalized to justify their own inclusion in our laws and lives.

Images via Towleroad, 1in3Campaign, & Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSblog.

Previous Post

March 26, 2013

Me & Oz

Next Post

March 29, 2013 Honorable Mention: Resisting Structural Evil

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion At the Intersections Atheism Christianity Contraception Education Feminism Gender Getting Theological Honorable Mention Islam LGBT News Our Voices Race Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Philippians, Paul mentions two women who need to be of the same mind. Who are they?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lydia and Chloe Phoebe and Priscilla Euodia and Syntyche Mary and Martha