Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

carlmccolman

Remaining at the Cross: On Being a Contemplative Christian in a Church That Has Forgotten Its Mystical Heritage

Last updated on: October 14, 2018 at 3:28 pm   by Carl "Skye" McColman

Remaining at the Cross: On Being a Contemplative Christian in a Church That Has Forgotten Its Mystical Heritage 2018-10-14T15:28:12-04:00 Carl "Skye" McColman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is turning out to be “James Ishmael Ford” week at my blog. Earlier this week I posted a review of his new book, Introduction to Zen Koans. Check it out if you haven’t done so already.

One of the reasons I like his writing so much is that he is a Zen roshi who warmly supports Christians who embrace zazen. We need more folks like him.

Yesterday, Ford Roshi wrote a blog post called “Living in the Great Buzz: Some Near Random Thoughts on Zen, Buddhism, Nondual Christianity, Decentering one’s Ego, And Finding a Life.” When he gets around to talking about Christianity, he has this to say:

It is that lovely nondual Christianity… that is popping up here and there that I find resonates. And. All I have to do is go to any Christian church for a Sunday service to recall this is an aberrant form of that tradition.[1]

His first point — that nondual (mystical/contemplative) Christianity resonates with his experience as a Zen Buddhist — is something I experience as well, only the other way around. But his second point — that nondual Christianity is “aberrant” — I must take issue with.

Granted, very few Christians have any sense of the mystical or contemplative heart of our spirituality. But that doesn’t make it aberrant. That just is evidence of how broken the body of Christ is.

So it’s no surprise that Ford never or rarely finds a whiff of authentic mysticism in a Sunday morning church service — and my hunch is, that’s true whether he was attending a Catholic, mainline Protestant or evangelical service.

(Generally speaking, Eastern Orthodox Christians have done the best job at preserving the mystical heart of Sunday worship, but most Orthodox churches in America have such strong cultural identities — Greek, Russian, etc. — that it’s hard for outsiders to find a place there.)

And, to be honest, I can’t blame him for saying “No, thank you, I’d rather be a Unitarian Buddhist.” That’s quite a reasonable choice to make.

So the interesting question is: why, given how impoverished contemporary Christianity is in relation to its own mystical treasury, do some of us choose to stay? In other words, why haven’t I — and numerous other Christian contemplative students and practitioners — why haven’t we abandoned the church, in search of a community where contemplation isn’t so absent from the mainstream?

It’s really the same question that many of us Catholics are wrestling with right now, in the wake of the recent Pennsylvania Grand Jury Report about clergy sex abuse — the latest sobering reminder that the Catholic hierarchy has, for decades now, put the reputation of the institution ahead of caring for its most vulnerable members. Why stay in such a profoundly broken institution?

The Truth of Christianity (a Postmodern Digression)

I suppose I could talk about truth — Ford suggests that, at the end of the day, Buddhism simply strikes him as more “true” than Christianity. I could say the same thing about my experience of Christianity. The problem that I run into with that approach is that, the deeper I get into my contemplative practice, the more I see all religious and wisdom traditions as essentially complex mythical narratives, designed to create meaning and cultural identity and to give adherents a sense of their place in the cosmos and their responsibilities both to one another and to the cosmos (or to the mystery that Christians call “God”).

In other words: contemplation takes us to the same place where postmodern philosophy goes: a place where “truth claims” begin to ring hollow, because they all are embedded in specific cultural or historical biases. Not that there is no such thing as truth, mind you. But humbly recognizing that all human efforts to proclaim truth are limited, contingent, and provisional.

Here’s my point: language can never reveal ultimate truth. Language by its nature is dualistic, and if we believe truth both precedes and transcends all dualities, then language just gets in the way.

So for me to say that Christianity feels more “true” to me than Buddhism is simply to acknowledge that I am personally deeply immersed in the Christian story, I find beauty and meaning in the Christian story, and that I love the Christian story, all of which is true — but none of which goes very far in anchoring me (or anyone else) in “truth,” particularly in any kind of objective or universal/modernist sense.

There are voices in the Jewish tradition that do a very good job of pointing out that what you believe about God is far less important than how you put your faith into action. Frankly, I’d like to see that perspective more widely embraced within Christianity. Is Christianity true? I think the answer to that question is found in the lives of the saints, far more so than in any kind of dogmatic declaration or theological treatise.

But I digress.

Why Stay in an Imperfect Church?

Back to the central question: why do I stay? Why should anyone stay?

I said above that I love the Christian story, but let me clarify that. I love Jesus. I fell in love with him when I took a New Testament course my senior year in college, and I’ve been in love with him ever since. I have no idea how much of his story is historical and how much is mythical, but at this point I don’t think it really matters, at least not to me. What matters is how the experience of loving Christ (which begins with the experience of being loved by Christ) makes a difference in my life.

I should hasten to add that I think the Buddha is pretty awesome too. But Jesus got to my heart first, which is probably the single biggest reason why I’m a Christian-interested-in-Buddhism rather than the other way around.

Part of loving Christ means wanting to be in relationship with him. Which means — at least in a spiritual sense — wanting to follow him, to listen to him, to wrestle with his teachings, and then to accompany him over the difficult parts of his story — including waiting with him at the foot of the cross.

In the story of the crucifixion, most of Jesus’s friends did not hang around at the foot of the cross. Most of them couldn’t handle seeing his broken, crucified body, and hearing him gasp for breath as he slowly died. Most just simply disappeared.

John stayed. Mary and several other women stayed. But the rest skipped out.

Now, it might be tempting to laud John and the women, and to get all judgmental toward Peter and Matthew and James and all the others. But that would be to royally miss the point.

Because Peter and James and all the other disciples who abandoned Jesus on the cross still became saints.

It seems that when it came to the crucifixion, some people had to leave. Others had to stay. It’s not about who’s right and who’s wrong. It’s just that each person did what he or she had to do.

Waiting with the Crucified Body

Photo by Christoph Schmid on Unsplash

Now, back to Christianity today. Christians call the church “the body of Christ.” So whenever you attend a local Sunday morning worship service, you are checking in with the body of Christ.

And guess what? The body is still being crucified — by its own mistakes, its own sin, its own instititutionalism, its own amnesia regarding its mystical and contemplative heart.

It is, frankly, painful how broken the body is. It’s painful to see, and painful to be present to it.

Some of us choose to stay with the crucified body. Many others need to leave. That’s okay. If Peter and James could become saints after abandoning Christ, then so can anyone living today. No judgement.

But it’s a mistake to say that the contemplative or nondual heart of Christian spirituality is aberrant. That’s just not true. What is aberrant is the broken body that unfortunately is all many people ever experience of the church.

Why do we stay? Like the women, we want to anoint the body before it gets placed in the tomb. And then we will wait, trusting in the Spirit who always brings new life.

After all, contemplation is, on one level, just a fancy word for “waiting.”

N.B. The image of waiting at (or leaving) the foot of the cross as a metaphor for staying in or leaving the church today was inspired by a talk given by Fr. Gerald McGlone, SJ, at St. Thomas More Catholic Church in Decatur, GA on September 30, 2018, called “Separating Fact from Fiction in the Sexual Abuse Crisis.” It’s well worth listening to. You can find an audio recording of the talk by clicking here.

[1]Update 10/14/18: After reading this post, Ford edited the paragraph that I quoted above, changing the last sentence to read: “All I have to do is go to any Christian church for a Sunday service to recall this nondual approach, while perhaps the true heart of the tradition, is also not normative.”


Enjoy reading this blog?
Click here to become a patron.

become_a_patron_button


Christianity

Contemplation

Crucifixion

interfaith dialogue

James Ishmael Ford

Mysticism

Previous Post



October 10, 2018

Want to Learn About Zen? Here's a Book to Get You Started

Next Post



October 18, 2018 Letting Go Of (Our Limited Image of) God


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Activism Announcements Art Books Catholicism Celtic Christianity Christian mysticism Christianity Contemplation Current events Etc. Family humor interfaith dialogue Interfaith Wisdom Interspirituality Lay Cistercians Living the Faith Meditation movies Mysticism Mystics nature Poetry Reviews Scripture silence Spirituality Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month February 2025 January 2025 November 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 August 2023 June 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 July 2013 May 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 March 2012 December 2011 September 2011 October 2010 August 2010 March 2010 September 2009 July 2008 January 2008 December 2007 September 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Ecclesiastes 2, what did the author try in search of meaning?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Worship, prayer, and sacrifice Teaching, healing, and prophecy Pleasure, work, and wisdom Fasting, solitude, and silence

Support this
Column

Related posts from Carl McColman

Contemplative

You don't have to become a monk to...

Carl McColman

Contemplative

If You Worship an Angry God, You'll Be...

Carl McColman

Contemplative

Join Me for "24 Meditations for 2024"

Carl McColman

Contemplative

LSD, Anxiety, and Contemplation: Can Psychedelic Therapy Support...

Carl McColman

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Contemplative

Handy Contemplative Practices for Political Spaces

A Spiritually Grounded Presence In order to bring a spiritually grounded presence...

Halloween: The Holiday of Loving Your Neighbor

All Hallows Eve Is Halloween the least Christian holiday in America, or...

Can Love Be Saved? Some Thoughts on the...

Happy Valentine's Day! I recently published a post on Patreon called Can...

"This Loving, Uniting Embrace": the Holy Ordinary

Today's guest post is by Mark Longhurst, author of The Holy Ordinary:...

How Are We Called to Live?: More About...

How Are We Called to Live? Many of us struggle with discerning...

A Spiritual Practice of Reading: Join Us Online

A Spiritual Practice of Reading A healthy spiritual practice of reading is...

view all Contemplative blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube