What If Darwin Rewrote the Declaration of Independence?

Last updated on: February 16, 2017 at 8:50 am by Carl Gregg

What If Darwin Rewrote the Declaration of Independence? 2017-02-15T11:46:37-05:00 Carl Gregg

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I posted yesterday on “What Does It Mean that We Are Sapiens? Reflections on Darwin Day.” And although there is a lot more to say about the history and implications of our species’s evolution, in reflecting on the implications of what it means to be Sapiens, I would like to consider not only genes, but also what are sometimes called memes. A gene is a region of DNA that is passed down biologically from parent to offspring. From a certain perspective, the more of your DNA that survives, the more you can be seen as winning at the game of evolution. In contrast to a biological gene, a meme (from the Greek word μίμημα, which also gives us the words mimic or mime) is an element of culture that is passed down not through biological genetics, but through social imitation (120).

To give an example of the difference of genes and memes, consider bee hives. If you look closely, you will see complex social structures; but what you see is instinctual, genetic behavior. “Bees don’t need lawyers, because there is no danger that they might forget or violate the hive constitution. The queen does not cheat the cleaner bees of their food, and they never go on strike demanding higher wages” (120). In contrast, for us humans, many of our laws and customs (at their best) are precisely to shape us in ways counter to what our natural, genetic selfish instincts might be. (There are also ways that our customs and laws sometimes uphold war, corruption, and division in ways that run counter to some of our natural unselfish instincts toward compassion, connection, and empathy.) And here’s a crucial point about memes versus genes: “A conscious effort has to be made to sustain laws, customs, procedures and manners, otherwise the social order would quickly collapse” (120).

Whereas genes are inherently and biologically within us, memes are “artificial instincts” that must be taught through culture (163). Consider, for example, the second sentence of the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Jefferson writes about these truths as “natural” laws — inherent, almost “genetic” and built into the order of things. But an evolutionary biologist might invite us to consider that if we were to be honest about what an actual “genetic” perspective tells us, Jefferson’s soaring prose might have to be rewritten as: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all [humans] evolved differently, that they are born with certain mutable characteristics, and that among these are life and the pursuit of pleasure” (110).

Similarly, in my tradition of Unitarian Universalism, our First Principle is “The inherent worth and dignity of every person.” A major influence on that choice was the 1948 United Nations’s “Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” The very first line of its preamble recognizes that, “the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world….” Likewise, following the preamble, the very first sentence of Article I says, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” I find it to be profound, powerful, and hopeful to be part of a religious movement that has explicitly chosen to weave into our First Principle the starting point of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But a Darwinian perspective invites us to be honest that this claim is more a meme than a gene — which is a reminder of how precious and precarious some of our deepest values are (110-111). There are many vital aspects of our culture that we must not take for granted. If we don’t defend them, they can be lost.

As the saying goes, “History may not exactly repeat itself, but it does often rhyme.” So are there lessons from the history of our species Sapiens than can help us predict what the future might hold? One lesson from history is that there have been five previous mass extinctions on this planet, so there are many reasons to take seriously that the threat of human-created climate change could cause a sixth mass extinction on Earth. Harari writes that some people call climate change “the destruction of nature,” but from his perspective of seeking to take the longview,

it’s not really destruction; it’s change. Nature cannot be destroyed. Sixty-five million years ago, an asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs, but in so doing opened the way forward for mammals. Today, humankind is driving many species into extinction and might even annihilate itself. But other organisms are doing quite well. Rats and cockroaches, for example are in their heyday. These tenacious creatures would probably creep out from beneath the smoking rubble of a nuclear Armageddon, ready and able to spread their DNA. Perhaps 65 million years from now, intelligent rats will look back gratefully on the decimation wrought by humankind, just as we today can thank that dinosaur-busting asteroid. (350-351)

Now, is that really going to happen? The truth is that the past few months have been a reminder that no one really knows what’s going to happen tomorrow much less 65 million years from now. Yuval Harari, author of Sapiens, has his guesses. And I saw recently that he has a sequel due to be published in about a week titled Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. That title picks up on the final line of Sapiens. In reference to how powerful our species has become, Harari concludes with a haunting question: “Is there anything more dangerous than dissatisfied and irresponsible gods who don’t know what they want” (416)?

I’ll be interested to read Harari’s more extended reflections. But I will say for now that there are many ways in which I remain hopeful. The spirit of resistance and resilience in recent days has shown that many of us do know what we want. For many progressive people, an articulation of what we want is similar to what is found in the UU Seven Principles:

In the face of bullying and divisiveness, we support “the inherent worth and dignity of every person”;
In the face of selfishness, cruelty, and greed, we support “justice, equity and compassion in human relations”;
In the face of religious fundamentalism and orthodox dogma, we support “acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth”;
In the face of anti-intellectualism, propaganda, and fake news, we support “a free and responsible search for truth and meaning”;
In the face of authoritarianism and the undermining of constitutional norms, we support “The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process.”
In the face of isolationism and tribalism, we support “The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice” — not only for some, but for all.
In the face of a destructive individualism, we support “respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.”

Liberal values of freedom, reason, and pluralism are more needed than ever.

From certain angles it can feel bleak to reflect on the implications of what it means that we humans are merely a sub-species called Sapiens. But Darwin himself would invite us to reframe that view. So on this week following International Darwin Day, I will conclude with the final paragraph of Darwin’s 1859 book On the Origin of Species:

from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving…the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life…; and whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved. (170)

The Rev. Dr. Carl Gregg is a certified spiritual director, a D.Min. graduate of San Francisco Theological Seminary, and the minister of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Frederick, Maryland. Follow him on Facebook (facebook.com/carlgregg) and Twitter (@carlgregg).

Learn more about Unitarian Universalism: http://www.uua.org/beliefs/principles

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 15, 2017

What Does It Mean that We Are Sapiens? Reflections on Darwin Day

Next Post

February 23, 2017 Why It Matters that Harriet Tubman Will Be on the $20 Bill

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Anti-Racism Archaeology Atheism Baptism Best of the Year List Book Reviews Buddhism Catholicism Christian Education Church and State Church Planting Climate Change Conscientious Objection to War Creation Spirituality Death Penalty Didache Disability Rights Discernment Easter Ecology Emergent Church Movement Empire-Critical Ethics Evolution Feminist Theology Film Reviews Gandhi Gospel of Mark Gun Control Hinduism Immigration Reform Interfaith Islam JFK Judaism Jungian Spirituality Lectionary Commentary Lent Letters to the Editor LGBT Marriage MLK Multiculturalism Mysticism Nonviolent Activism Occupy Paganism (Earth-centered Religions) Parables Paul Pluralism Politics Process Theology Quantum Physics Requiescat In Pace Seminary and Divinity School Sermon Series Retrospective Sermons Spiritual Direction Spiritual Practices Stewardship (Fundraising) The Book of J The Wheel of the Year (Paganism) Theoblogger Challenge Triathlon Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism Worship Resources Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2026 May 2026 March 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 August 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 August 2009 July 2009 May 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Bethany" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

House of affliction House of mercy House of bread House of stone