Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

carlgregg

Atheists May Have a Point on Clergy Tax Breaks

Last updated on: April 9, 2012 at 7:03 pm   by Carl Gregg

Atheists May Have a Point on Clergy Tax Breaks 2012-04-09T19:03:23-04:00 Carl Gregg

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Many news outlets have reported in recent days about a group of atheists who have filed a federal lawsuit to end tax breaks for clergy.

I’m on record as strongly supporting the separation of church and state as outlined in the first part of the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….” I’ve also said a number of times over the years that I wasn’t sure the government-sponsored tax break for clergy was a great idea: better to keep government out of religion whenever possible.

Full disclosure: I’ve never been that excited to rally against my economic self-interest as a member of the clergy, and clergy salaries are often low; however, I’m not sure government should assume the role of making up the difference.

Below I’ll list a few good points from the articles I have read about this matter that are worth considering.

from the Religion News Service

There are secular humanist organizations that do tremendous service to the common good, but the atheist leaders of these organizations do not benefit from the clergy tax break:

All three plaintiffs receive part of their salaries as housing allowances, but do not qualify for the tax exemption because they are not clergy. That amounts to an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion, they claim, because the parish exemption aids and subsidizes religion by providing ministers with financial benefits not given to secular workers. ”The government is preferring ministers of the gospel over those of us who think religion should be, if not eliminated, limited,” said Dan Barker, co-president of the FFRF [Freedom from Religion Foundation].

Also, this tax break comes, not from the founding our nation, but from a reactionary, mid-20th century impulse:

The parish exemption entered the tax code in 1954, the same year the phrase “under God” was added to the Pledge of Allegiance. The country was deep in the Cold War and providing clergy with a tax break was seen as reinforcing religiosity in the fight against godless communism.

from Associated Baptist Press

There is no provision to limit this tax break to only a clergy person’s primary residence, thereby unduly benefiting the rich and impoverishing tax revenues:

Recently the U.S. Tax Court interpreted the law to apply even to multiple homes, ruling 7-6 that Phil Driscoll, an ordained minister and Grammy Award-winning trumpeter who went to prison for tax evasion, didn’t owe federal income taxes on more than $400,000 provided by his ministry to buy a second home on a lake near Cleveland, Tenn.

On my earlier point that it is good to keep church and state separate whenever possible:

The lawsuit claims that in order to enforce the tax law the IRS and Treasury Department must “make sensitive, fact intensive, intrusive, and subjective determinations” on religious issues like which activities constitute “religious worship” and whether a member of the clergy is “duly ordained, commissioned or licensed.” Those and other determinations result in “excessive entanglement” between church and state contrary to the Establishment Clause.

from the Wall Street Journal

Some congressional representatives are separately looking into this provision:

Sen. Charles Grassley (R., Iowa), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said he wants to ensure that the spirit of the provision isn’t violated. ”It’s fair to question why a clergy member needs a tax-free allowance for more than one home, and whether tax-exempt churches should subsidize millionaire ministers,” he says.

Confusingly the WSJ cites a different start date for this law, and I have not yet had the time to investigate who is correct:

Under a provision of the tax code known as the parsonage allowance, first passed in 1921, an ordained clergy member may live tax-free in a home owned by his or her religious organization or receive a tax-free annual payment to buy or rent a home if the congregation approves.

I welcome your feedback in the comments section.

The Rev. Carl Gregg is the pastor of Broadview Church in Chesapeake Beach, Maryland. Follow him onFacebook and Twitter.

Atheism

Church and State

Previous Post



September 20, 2011

BOOK REVIEW: "Biography of Abd el-Kader"

Next Post



September 26, 2011 Letter to the Editor


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Anti-Racism Archaeology Atheism Baptism Best of the Year List Book Reviews Buddhism Catholicism Christian Education Church and State Church Planting Climate Change Conscientious Objection to War Creation Spirituality Death Penalty Didache Disability Rights Discernment Easter Ecology Emergent Church Movement Empire-Critical Ethics Evolution Feminist Theology Film Reviews Gandhi Gospel of Mark Gun Control Hinduism Immigration Reform Interfaith Islam JFK Judaism Jungian Spirituality Lectionary Commentary Lent Letters to the Editor LGBT Marriage MLK Multiculturalism Mysticism Nonviolent Activism Occupy Paganism (Earth-centered Religions) Parables Paul Pluralism Politics Process Theology Quantum Physics Requiescat In Pace Seminary and Divinity School Sermon Series Retrospective Sermons Spiritual Direction Spiritual Practices Stewardship (Fundraising) The Book of J The Wheel of the Year (Paganism) Theoblogger Challenge Triathlon Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism Worship Resources Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2026 May 2026 March 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 August 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 August 2009 July 2009 May 2009


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "If we are thrown into the blazing furnace, the God we serve is able to deliver us"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego Daniel The high priest Nebuchadnezzar

Related posts from Carl Gregg

More Voices

Are You a Faitheist?

Carl Gregg

More Voices

"A God That Could Be Real"

Carl Gregg

More Voices

Can You Be Both a Religious Liberal and...

Carl Gregg

More Voices

"Atheism for Lent": The Spiritual Practice of Doubt

Carl Gregg

TRENDING AT PATHEOS More Voices

Reading America at 250: A Nation Wrestles With...

As part of my own reflection on the 250th anniversary of the...

Honesty in a Dishonest Age

Whenever I am reading a book or listening to an argument, I...

President Trump Ban Animal Torture Videos on Facebook

Call for Stricter Regulations of Animal Abuse Content on Facebook Although President...

Draft Amendments to Address Ritual Abuse in New...

The proposed changes would make it illegal for individuals in domestic partnerships...

How Bans on LGBTQ+ Student Clubs Threaten Religious...

On June 20, 2025, the State of Texas passed Senate Bill 12....

The Truth About the Gen Z Revival

This past year, there has been a lot of media buzz surrounding...

view all More Voices blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube