By Whose Authority? (Progressive Christianity Symposium)

Last updated on: June 8, 2011 at 2:04 am by Carl Gregg

By Whose Authority? (Progressive Christianity Symposium) 2011-06-08T02:04:23-04:00 Carl Gregg

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Editor’s Note: This article is part of the symposium, “What Is Progressive Christianity?” presented by the newly launched Patheos Progressive Christian Portal and in partnership with the Wild Goose Festival (June 23-26). Like us on Facebook to receive today’s best commentary on Progressive Christianity.

I often begin any attempt to define Progressive Christianity by contrasting it with so-called “Orthodox Christianity.” As a Progressive Christian, when I am presented with a theological question, my first instinct is usually to consult my personal experience. In contrast, many orthodox Christians have been formed to begin theological reflection by asking, “What has been the creedal confession of church tradition concerning this issue?” These two different starting points prompt these two camps to move in different theological trajectories, and usually to land at starkly different end points.

To further clarify the orientation of Progressive Christianity, theological historian Gary Dorrien has written a magisterial three-volume history of Progressive Theology in the United States titled, The Making of American Liberal Theology. Volume 1, “Imagining Progressive Religion” covers 1805-1900; Volume 2, “Idealism, Realism, and Modernity” covers 1900-1950; and Volume 3, “Crisis, Irony, and Postmodernity” covers 1950-2005. As a related sidenote, Dorrien has also published a landmark history of U.S. Social Ethics titled, Social Ethics in the Making: Interpreting an American Tradition. And having surveyed the sweep Progressive Christian Theology and Ethics in the United States, Dorrien defines progressive theology as “based on reason and critically interpreted religious experience, not external authority” (2006:1).

I hear Dorrien’s definition as related to the “Wesleyan Quadrilateral” (attributed to Methodist founder John Wesley), which looks to four equally-important sources of authority: Scripture, Tradition, Reason, and Experience. Personally, I understand scripture as one among many parts of Christian tradition; hence, I name three major sources of authority (Reason, Tradition, and Experience) instead of the four named by Wesley or the two named by Dorrien (Reason and Experience). I would also add that an example of Christian theology “based on reason and critically interpreted religious experience, not external authority” is Marcus Borg’s excellent and accessible book The Heart of Christianity.

Most importantly as a Progressive Christian, I do not want to abandon my brain at the door of the church; therefore, in regard to the orthodox deference to creedal tradition, I find it insufficient merely to refer to a historic creed as an answer to a theological question; however, I also do not want to dismiss outright central Christian confessions without asking how we may understand them anew today. To adapt a famous phrase, you should preach “with the Bible in one hand the newspaper other hand.” These words are famously attributed to twentieth-century Protestant theologian Karl Barth, but I was unable to find an attribution. According to the website of Princeton Theological Seminary’s Center for Barth Studies, Barth did not encourage others to hold the Bible and the newspaper in tension (a classic progressive position that I am espousing); instead, Barth taught his students to “interpret newspapers from your Bible.” In other words, Barth understood the Bible as a higher authority than personal, contemporary experience; thus, he thought Christians should use the Bible as a lens through which to interpret contemporary events. In Barth’s day this perspective was known as Neo-orthodoxy. Today, the closest version of this perspective is called postliberalism. An alternative view, which I am advocating, is to hold both the biblical account and contemporary, personal experience in dialectical tension.

The polar approach to progressivism is seen in reactionary fundamentalists, who, in the face of twenty-first century science, cling to biblical literalism. For example, the proprietors of the Creation Museum in Kentucky explain the existence of dinosaur bones with an exhibit featuring dinosaurs roaming around the Garden of Eden. After reading news stories about this display, I wanted to yell, “Stop! You’re not doing Jesus any favors. You’re not making Christianity better. You’re only making science worse.”

Just as one traditional response from the religious camp has been to reject the stories science tells, many scientists have rejected the stories religion tells. The promise of progressive theology is to hold both sets of stories in tension, inviting both camps to be appropriately humble in the face of pluralism and the limits of human knowledge. As a counterexample to my criticism of the Creation Museum, an example of progressive theology embracing science is the celebration of Evolution Sunday or “Evolution Weekend” as the event is becoming known. For the past five years, an increasing number of individuals, churches, and faith communities have recognized the Sunday closest to Charles Darwin’s birthday (February 12) as an annual opportunity to reflect on what religion has to learn from science, in particular how Christianity can embrace the insights of evolution.

As I move to a conclusion of this brief piece on Progressive Christianity, I will add that committing ourselves to what Jesus called the Greatest Commandments, loving God and neighbor, is at the center of what it means to be a progressive Christian. I will also add that my personal “growing edge” in regard to Progressive Christianity is an exploration of Process Theology. As the name implies, “Process Theology” is a field of theology that invites us to see all aspects of our world and our experience — including God — as perpetually in process: always growing, always changing, and always evolving. Process Theology helps me make sense — looking to both Reason, Tradition, and Experience — of our twenty-first-century, postmodern world of Pluralism and Quantum Physics. Process Theology is, however, only one of many branches within the invigorating and challenging world of Progressive Christianity.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 3, 2011

Lectionary Commentary: “A Practical, Pragmatic, and Progressive Pentecost” (for June 12, 2011)

Next Post

June 10, 2011 Lectionary Commentary: “Bring Many Names: Progressive Christianity on Trinity Sunday” (for June 19, 2011)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Anti-Racism Archaeology Atheism Baptism Best of the Year List Book Reviews Buddhism Catholicism Christian Education Church and State Church Planting Climate Change Conscientious Objection to War Creation Spirituality Death Penalty Didache Disability Rights Discernment Easter Ecology Emergent Church Movement Empire-Critical Ethics Evolution Feminist Theology Film Reviews Gandhi Gospel of Mark Gun Control Hinduism Immigration Reform Interfaith Islam JFK Judaism Jungian Spirituality Lectionary Commentary Lent Letters to the Editor LGBT Marriage MLK Multiculturalism Mysticism Nonviolent Activism Occupy Paganism (Earth-centered Religions) Parables Paul Pluralism Politics Process Theology Quantum Physics Requiescat In Pace Seminary and Divinity School Sermon Series Retrospective Sermons Spiritual Direction Spiritual Practices Stewardship (Fundraising) The Book of J The Wheel of the Year (Paganism) Theoblogger Challenge Triathlon Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism Worship Resources Youth Ministry

Select a Month July 2026 May 2026 March 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 March 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 August 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 August 2009 July 2009 May 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book follows Psalms in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Job Ecclesiastes Proverbs Song of Solomon