Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Bruce Reyes-Chow

Why Romney’s High School “Prank” Matters

Last updated on: May 14, 2012 at 6:58 am   by Bruce Reyes-Chow

Why Romney’s High School “Prank” Matters 2012-05-14T06:58:10-07:00 Bruce Reyes-Chow

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

[Photo by Austen Hufford]

As some of you heard, last week the Washington Post reported a story about presidential hopeful, Mitt Romney, and his participation in an incident that many are calling “bullying.” Taking place in 1965 while a student at Cranbrook School, Romney, along with a group of friends, held down fellow classmate, John Lauber, and cut off his hair with a pair of scissors.

“He can’t look like that. That’s wrong. Just look at him!” an incensed Romney told Matthew Friedemann, his close friend in the Stevens Hall dorm, according to Friedemann’s recollection. Mitt, the teenage son of Michigan Gov. George Romney, kept complaining about Lauber’s look, Friedemann recalled.

A few days later, Friedemann entered Stevens Hall off the school’s collegiate quad to find Romney marching out of his own room ahead of a prep school posse shouting about their plan to cut Lauber’s hair. Friedemann followed them to a nearby room where they came upon Lauber, tackled him and pinned him to the ground. As Lauber, his eyes filling with tears, screamed for help, Romney repeatedly clipped his hair with a pair of scissors.

The incident was recalled similarly by five students, who gave their accounts independently of one another. Four of them — Friedemann, now a dentist; Phillip Maxwell, a lawyer; Thomas Buford, a retired prosecutor; and David Seed, a retired principal — spoke on the record. Another former student who witnessed the incident asked not to be identified. The men have differing political affiliations, although they mostly lean Democratic. Buford volunteered for Barack Obama’s campaign in 2008. Seed, a registered independent, has served as a Republican county chairman in Michigan. All of them said that politics in no way colored their recollections.

You can read the entire story here.

As one can imagine the punditry from all sides has been cray-cray. Quick to get this one under control I’m sure, Romney responded to the story during a live radio interview with Fox News personality Brian Kilmeade,

Back in high school, I did some dumb things, and if anybody was hurt by that or offended, obviously I apologize for that. I participated in a lot of hijinks and pranks during high school, and some might have gone too far, and for that I apologize.

First of all, for those who think that going after his high school behavior isn’t fair game, I beg to differ. I think that if one is running for President of the United States EVERYTHING is fair game. Yes, 45 years ago is a long time, but this incident coupled with the whole dog on the roof of the car one, and I am developing an image of person who sees other lives in a very different way than I do, one where the pain and suffering of another living creature has no impact.

One issue that I have with the whole mess is that Romney has yet to actually admit to being part of the incident, instead answering with a vague, “some [pranks] may have gone to far” category that only leaves me to wonder if there were so many so-called “pranks” that he cannot keep them all straight. While there is no way the Republican party will get my vote in this year’s election, I think it would have gone a long way for him in gaining the support of some independents and libertarians to own up to being part of the incident, after all, few are denying that he was part of it?

Which leads me to my second concern. For many, there seems to be a “boys will be boys” or “we all did stupid stuff when we were kids” attitude to excuse Romney’s actions. Now, I admit, as the father of three girls, I am no expert on raising boys. At the same time, I was a boy once myself and I have seen many a gender behavior played out on the playground and school. We could argue the reasons why some boys and girls fulfill traditional male or female expectations, but I would still say that even this reality combined with the poor choices of  youth in no way excuses the terror that must have been inflicted on his classmate. I just do not think this is the norm for anyone, boy or girl.

Yes, I was a boy. I did stupid youthful “boys-will-be-boys” things – drinking, smoking and blowing up dog poop with firecrackers just to name a few*- but never did I lead a group of boys, held another boy down against his will and cut off his hair. To see what must have only been terror in the eyes of another human and continue the act is inexcusable and without ever claiming responsibility or repentance, gives us a window into his personhood and soul.

So what do you think? Is it fair to raise these issues from his past? And if it is true, does it matter? Or is this a liberal hack job from the WP and the Obama campaign? Here is a good clip from ABC news.

I have been pretty clear with where I stand on the whole thing, what say you?

* I am obviously never running for President 😉

culture | politics

bullying

David Seed

elections

high school

John Lauber

Matthew Friedemann

MITT ROMNEY

Phillip Maxwell

politics

pranks

Thomas Buford

Washington Post

Previous Post



May 11, 2012

The Presbyterian Church (USA)'s Recent Round of Layoffs

Next Post



May 14, 2012 Religion and Media: An Interview with Mark Hoffman


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category brain | candy bulletin | board culture | politics faith | religion family | community media | technology Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 March 2013 January 2013 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 August 2010 November 2009 September 1995




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the first woman created?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Esther Leah Sarah Eve

Related posts from Bruce Reyes-Chow

Progressive Christian

10 Tips for Being a Good Ally

Bruce Reyes-Chow

Progressive Christian

Jane Lui and Friends Cover TLC's Waterfall

Bruce Reyes-Chow

Progressive Christian

10 Ways to Disconnect from the Next Generation...

Bruce Reyes-Chow

Progressive Christian

FREE DOWNLOAD and My Interview with Leslie Rodriguez...

Bruce Reyes-Chow

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube