Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Church Grammar

Why Did the Book of Revelation Outlast Other Early Christian Apocalypses?

Last updated on: September 1, 2017 at 1:36 pm   by Brandon D. Smith

Why Did the Book of Revelation Outlast Other Early Christian Apocalypses? 2017-09-01T13:36:00-05:00 Brandon D. Smith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Revelation ancient artThe Book of Revelation/John’s Apocalypse was not the only apocalypse read and even revered by early Christians. In the first few centuries of Christianity, it stood alongside or was replaced by other Christian apocalyptic literature, most notably Shepherd of Hermas, Apocalypse of Peter, and Ascension of Isaiah. In my dissertation, the relationship between Revelation and these other works is one of the questions I’m wrestling with in my first chapter. Why did Revelation outlast the others, becoming a sole apocalyptic member of the New Testament canon?

Of course, the overarching answer is the preservation of God’s Word by God himself. We should, at some level, grant that. But, having said that, we can also look at the works themselves and see the continuity/disparity with other biblical texts and the scope of Christian teaching at-large. It’s no stretch to wonder whether or not Revelation survived because of its robust theology and usefulness in the budding Trinitarian theology, while others fell by the wayside as their theology resembled the heretics more than the defenders of orthodoxy.

Shepherd of Hermas is perhaps the most prominent among these works, having been included in certain canonical lists and quoted often in the early church. Ignatius of Antioch rejected the book because of its failure to distinguish between the two natures of Christ.[1] Tertullian had a tentative relationship with Hermas, eventually rejecting its “liberal” views on several topics, including on remarriage and repentance,[2] while simultaneously including Revelation in an early list of authoritative books.[3] Origen and Clement of Alexandria both quoted Hermas frequently, the latter going so far as to call it divinely inspired.[4] Other early church leaders such as Athanasius, Eusebius, and Rufinus seemed to follow the Muratorian Canon thread of denying its authority but recommending it as helpful for private reading and catechesis.[5] Its relevance in the West held on for a few centuries, with Augustine and John Cassian quoting it regularly, but its use began to wane, with regular quotations beginning to decline, indicating its diminishing authority and relevance.[6] By the sixth-century, Pseudo-Gelasian Decrees outright rejected Hermas, calling it “useful only to heretics and schismatics.”[7] At least in part, we can assume that Hermas eventually fell off the canonical map due to its inconsistent Trinitarian theology—particularly its confusion of Jesus and the Holy Spirit with one another and with angels—which could not have been tolerated in the middle of orthodoxy debates about the divinity and personhood of the Father, Son, and Spirit.

Origen is accused of dabbling in universal salvation and may have had some familiarity with Apocalypse of Peter’s interesting and heretical views on the potential final salvation of Satan,[8] however these types of views on the divine judgment of God surely played a role in its eventual dismissal from Christian usage. As for Ascension of Isaiah, the Trinitarian debates had no room for its teaching that there is indeed a divine triad of Father, Son, and Spirit, but that Christ and the Spirit both ultimately worship the Father.[9] Both of these books were less widespread and influential as Hermas, but fell into the same trap of sloppy and inconsistent teachings about the persons of the Trinity, in a time when sloppy language was not being tolerated (and rightfully so!).

—

Stay in touch! Email me at [email protected] or connect with me on Academia.edu.

—

[1] H.D. McDonald, “Development and Christology,” Vox Evangelica 9 (1975): 5.

[2] Carolyn Osiek, The Shepherd of Hermas (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1999), 5. Many believe part of this rejection was due to Tertullian’s later sympathy with Montanism.

[3] J. N. D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines, 5th ed. (New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 1978), 59.

[4] Osiek, The Shepherd of Hermas, 5.

[5] Osiek, The Shepherd of Hermas, 6.

[6] Osiek, The Shepherd of Hermas, 7.

[7] Osiek, The Shepherd of Hermas, 7.

[8] Ilaria L. E. Ramelli, “Origen, Bardaiṣan, and the Origin of Universal Salvation,” Harvard Theological Review 102/02 (2009): 136-40.

[9] Osiek, The Shepherd of Hermas, 33.

Church History

Eschatology

Scripture

Theology

Trinity

Apocalypse of Peter

Ascension of Isaiah

Christology

Church History

Pneumatology

Revelation

Scripture

Shepherd of Hermas

theology

Trinity

Previous Post



August 23, 2017

Blood Moons, Babylonian Whores, and Reading Revelation Rightly

Next Post



September 5, 2017 The Sermon on the Mount and Jesus's Command to "Be Perfect"


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academics Apologetics Baptists Biblical Interpretation Biblical Studies Blog News Books Christian Life Church History Culture Ecclesiology Eschatology Gospel Interviews New Creation News Politics Science Scripture Sexual Sin Social Media Spiritual Discipline The Smorgasbord Theology Trinity Word Matters Podcast

Select a Month September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book comes immediately after Acts in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Galatians 1 Corinthians Hebrews Romans

Books by This Author Books by Brandon D. Smith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Church Grammar

Evangelical

What We Know about Arius and His Heresy

Church Grammar

Evangelical

The Sermon on the Mount and Jesus's Command...

Church Grammar

Evangelical

Blood Moons, Babylonian Whores, and Reading Revelation Rightly

Church Grammar

Evangelical

Jesus, Jonah, and Doubting God

Church Grammar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go

I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube