NH To Repeal the Death Penalty?

Last updated on: February 25, 2019 at 9:45 pm by Ben Hartford

NH To Repeal the Death Penalty? 2019-02-25T21:45:20-05:00 Ben Hartford

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.

If, however, non-lethal means are sufficient to defend and protect people’s safety from the aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity to the dignity of the human person.

Today, in fact, as a consequence of the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm – without definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself – the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity “are very rare, if not practically nonexistent.”

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2267

Image by Greg Montani from Pixabay

Ellen Kolb reports on her website Leaven for the Loaf that the NH House Criminal Justice and Public Safety committee has recommended a repeal of the death penalty as “ought to pass” thanks to the change of heart by long-time death penalty supporter Representative David Welch, the ranking Republican on the committee.

Often thought of as a liberal position, I make the argument that a little “l” liberal society with full ability to imprison a dangerous criminal, thereby protecting human life, needs to only kill criminals if it means to be barbaric. From a public safety point of view, the death penalty saves no lives and only serves to take another one. From crime deterrent point of view, I can’t fathom a situation where a capital crime is about to happen and the potential criminal stops and says, “Nah. I’m not going to do this. Not because I respect the person’s inherent right to live, but because I’m afraid of losing my inherent right to live.” From a budgetary point of view, it costs a lot of money since we rightly give the condemned every reasonable opportunity to make their case for living, since our justice system is based on convicting as many guilty parties as possible while (hopefully) convicting zero innocent parties.

God of Eden and of our mothers, please help the New Hampshire legislature see that we are all made in your image, and that your love for each and every one of us does not diminish no matter how grave our sins. Bless us with wisdom and compassion. In Jesus’ holy name, in the Father, through the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Previous Post

February 25, 2019

The Presentation of Jesus in the Temple

Next Post

February 26, 2019 The Carrying of the Cross

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category catholic faith fatherhood fitness fun marriage Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2023 February 2023 January 2023 August 2022 July 2022 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who asked Jesus, "What is truth?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Caiaphas Pilate Judas