Institutional Drift of the Working Class

Last updated on: March 2, 2012 at 11:43 am by Jerry Park

Institutional Drift of the Working Class 2012-03-02T11:43:10-05:00 Jerry Park

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Has something happened to our working class? While much of my research has focused on racial inequalities in America, these investigations usually don’t leave me too far from the broader matter of social class inequalities. When sociologists talk about social inequalities we usually are referring to those who are making low wages or those who are classified in poverty. In class I tend to refer to them as a vulnerable population since many students are working minimum wage jobs and don’t always connect their experience with the concept of being part of the working class. For the most part the “returns on education,” particularly college education, is still better than no college education-so for many of these students they intuitively know, or hope, that their job at Ann Taylor or as library assistant is temporary until they land a “real job,” the one that their college degree promises.

The message regarding those in poverty and the working poor is usually the same: life is pretty hard, as this online experiment shows (very useful by the way in teaching). Your pay is just sufficient enough to get by as long as you never get sick, don’t get your hours cut, or have a major transportation problem that leaves you showing up for work late (and potentially fired as a result). You’re more often exposed to natural elements, harsh chemicals, and dangerous machinery which can cause bodily harm if you’re not careful. Typical examples include: migrant agrarian workers, waste management, restaurant staff, valet parking workers, fast food employees, building custodians. Millions of Americans who won’t attain a college degree earn their livelihood from these jobs.

When I read about the recent finding that more than 50% of births to women under 30 occur outside of marriage, (which fellow blogger Mark Regnerus described), this could be interpreted as an increasing lack of interest or valuing the institution of marriage in raising a child. When I looked more carefully at the figures, it turns out that largest increase in non-marital birth happens to women under 30 with less than a college degree. This sounds like the working class.

This reminded me of the studies that link self-reports of “no religion” with class, particularly education. As you might guess, it’s those with lower education that show the lowest amount of church attendance. Bear in mind, there is an increasing percentage of Americans that are reporting “no religion” as well.

When I put these pieces together, I get a picture that the working class is most affected by changes in social institutions, and generally it seems like there has been a growing drift away from the institutions of marriage and religion. Generally from the view of religiously identified Americans, this drift from these major institutions is not a good sign. But even if one is not religious, some research suggests that participation in marriage and religious groups are generally associated with desirable outcomes such as greater material prosperity [link]. If that’s the case, then perhaps part of the puzzle of the widening gap between rich and poor is reflected also in institutional participation. Again I hesitate to say that there’s a causal link, but they seem to be happening at the same time. Not surprisingly too, if this drift away from marriage and religious participation is in some way linked to class, we’re referring to at least 46 million Americans that are below poverty in more than 9 million families.

In the spirit of dialogue and conversation, I invite readers, especially those from the various Christian traditions, to help me understand the linkages I suggest earlier and consider the following:

Within a couple of decades, a significant part of the adult population, perhaps upwards to half, may not have been raised in a conventional nuclear two-parent household. Moreover, the class of Americans who will most exemplify this pattern will be those who are increasingly unchurched in general. Are our churches prepared to meet this emerging generation?

Second, I ask Christians in particular whether we have unintentionally helped this pattern emerge by paying more attention to our church building plans and programs, and “protecting” our children through greater social isolation from the lower classes via “safer neighborhoods” and homeschooling? Since we don’t give all that much why do we not consider giving a little more toward efforts that reach more of these vulnerable among us?

Previous Post

February 23, 2012

Religious Affiliation in the United States by State (Interactive Map)

Next Post

February 27, 2012 Nonmonogamy? Not yet.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Amy Reynolds Becky Hsu Brad Wright critical realism George Yancey Gerardo Marti Jeremy Rhodes Jerry Park John Schmalzbauer Margarita Mooney Mark Regnerus Nicolette Manglos positive sociology Richard Flory Robert Woodberry Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 August 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz