Heard in the Hallways at SSSR

Last updated on: October 31, 2011 at 6:41 pm by Margarita A. Mooney

Heard in the Hallways at SSSR 2011-10-31T18:41:18-05:00 Margarita A. Mooney

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I just returned from the annual meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, where among other things, I met with “collabloggers” Regnerus, Park and Wright. I wanted to share some quick highlights of the meetings, topics you I will likely elaborate on more on this blog.

No one in recent memory who sat next to me on a plane has ever known the sociology, theology or philosophy authors I tend to read in flight, but this time was an exception. Shortly after takeoff, I pulled out a book by Henri Nouwen, and I was quite surprised when the 40-something year old gentleman next to me said he had heard of Nouwen and the organization, L’Arche, that forms the setting and inspiration for much of his writing. Turns out that gentelman is the pastor of an Evangelical church and a chaplain for a major-league baseball team. We chatted about what Nouwen’s insights into the human condition have to offer the rich and famous on the field and those struggling in today’s economy. I hope he reads our blog every once in a while, and I promise to write more about Nouwen sometime soon.

“Hey, I’ve seen your blog, nice job.” I heard that many times from people I didn’t know and people I do know; thanks for noticing, reading us, and introducing yourselves to us 🙂 And don’t forget to “share” us online if you like us!

If you got to talk to me for more than 5 minutes, you probably heard me talk about virtue ethics and sociology of religion. Thanks to all of you who pointed out the links between Bordieu’s concept of habitus and Aquinas’s writings on virtue. I’ll look into it; and the topic of virtue ethics and sociology of religion shall appear on BWG soon.

You also probably heard me talking about Martin Riesebrodt’s The Promise of Salvation: A Theory of Religion, which may be the best social theory book on religion in recent decades. I particularly like his definition of religion: “Religion is a complex of practices that are based on the existence of superhuman powers, whether personal or impersonal, that are generally invisible” (p. 75). I like this definition because it focuses on the universality of religion as a category of practice, leaving open the meaning behind that practice.

In an interview published on the SSRC’s Immanent Frame, Robert Bellah also argued that practice, not belief, is what is universal about religion. Even Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, seems to agree. In his book On the Way to Jesus Christ, in the section entitled “The Position of Faith in Christ Within Religious and Intellectual History,” Ratiznger argues that Christianity engaged with other religions through actions–worship, liturgy, and forms of life. Hence, like Bellah and Riesebrodt, Ratzigner emphasizes that the commonality of religion is not in discourse, belief or ideology, but in action.

But don’t at least Christians believe what they are doing, so isn’t it the belief that really matters about religion? I’m not so sure. In fact, as I discussed with Chris Ellison, I think religious doubt or spiritual struggles is under-studied in the sociology of religion. In Ratzinger’s Introduction to Christianity (don’t let the title mis-lead you–this book is written for scholars and thinkers), he argues that doubt more than belief is what is common to all men and women-so-called believers and atheists alike.

To illustrate, the biographies of great saints like St. Therese of Lisieux and Mother Teresa of Calcutta illustrate that “the believer is always threatened with an uncertainty that in moments of temptation can suddenly and unexpectedly cast a piercing light on the fragility of the whole that usually seems self-evident to him” (Introduction to Christianity, p. 42) Neither does the non-believer, according to Ratzinger, ever live free of the doubt that his belief in positivism, his belief in the world he has constructed, is in fact reality. Hence, “there is no escape from the dilemma of being a man,” (Introduction to Christianity, p. 45), that is, of experiencing doubt, whether that is doubt in your belief or in your unbelief.

Stay tuned for how I think a definition of religion as practice and keen attention to doubt can contribute making the sociology of religion more attune to religions other than Christianity and to the struggles of believers and non-believers alike to find and hold on to meaning.

Margarita Mooney

SSSR

Theory

Previous Post

October 29, 2011

An interview with Daniel Darling

Next Post

October 31, 2011 Beauty and the Beast

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Amy Reynolds Becky Hsu Brad Wright critical realism George Yancey Gerardo Marti Jeremy Rhodes Jerry Park John Schmalzbauer Margarita Mooney Mark Regnerus Nicolette Manglos positive sociology Richard Flory Robert Woodberry Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 August 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz