Schmemann as Pastor in America

Last updated on: June 3, 2019 at 10:52 am by Billy Kangas

Schmemann as Pastor in America 2019-06-03T10:52:07-04:00 Billy Kangas

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The history of Eastern Orthodoxy in the United States is fascinating. In my own study of it I’ve been amazed at how one individual can so dramatically change the course and direction of the Church. There are a handful of individuals who had a vision for the Gospel and their community and were able to transform the life of the communities they were a part of.

For Orthodox Christians in the United States, particularly those connected to the OCA today, the work of Alexander Schmemann has made a tremendous impact.

I personally noticed this as I began spending time with Orthodox Christians regularly about 10 years ago. It seemed Fr. Schmemann was referenced all the time. I didn’t really understand the scope and the controversy of his influence until I read Paul Meyendorff’s contribution to We Give Our Thanks to Thee.

We turn our attention today to the second chapter in Porter Taylor’s volume in honor of Fr. Schmemann today; a chapter entitled “Alexander Schmemann’s Liturgical Legacy in America;” an essay that is now 10 years old, but reprinted in this volume graciously. Dr. Meyendorff is uniquely positioned to speak of his influence. He held the chair named after Schmemann at St. Vladimir’s and has been writing on Schmemann for over 30 years.

In this contribution, Meyendorff lays out a very helpful picture of how Schmemann was able to impact a new generation of pastors with a deep respect for the power and role of the liturgical life of the Church in the 20th century.

First, he mentions the establishment of liturgical theology as a legitimate academic discipline. This is the legacy that is most evident to liturgical theologians. In many ways, Schmemann pioneered a whole school of thought and an approach to the liturgy that has remained highly influential on many of the leading liturgical minds of today. I would be tempting to spend most of the essay speaking of this contribution but Dr. Meyendorff does not.

Meyendorff focuses most of his article on the pastoral impact of Fr. Schmemann. The first of these impacts is Baptism. It’s incredible to see how practices around baptism have so dramatically changed within a generation because of the work of Fr. Alexander. When he began his ministry in the United States baptisms were private affairs marking the birth of a child, and done in private residences. Fr. Schmemann transformed this not through a heavy-handed approach in the parish but by casting a bigger vision of sacramentality in the life of the Church and to the world in the lives of the seminarians he encountered.

Meyendorff then talks about the Eucharist itself. Schmemann similarly cast a vision for the Eucharist that was deep, personal, transformative and made it a core part of the Christian life. As he communicated through beauty, he was able to change practice. The faithful, at the beginning of his ministry, rarely received. The anaphora was a secret prayer, and an unhealthy piety around one’s worthiness had grown up around the reception of the sacrament. Schmemann worked hard to change the imagination of the faithful and was able to make regular reception normative in many parishes.

Just as Schmemann inspired the faithful to make regular reception a part of their spiritual lives, he also helped to restore confession of sins into the normal life of the Church. He realized that many of the faithful had never experienced this sacrament in the United States, and the few that did experience it in contexts that were rushed and distracted. The US created a context in which the monastic elders that had been deeply tied to the practice were simply not to be found in most communities. For those who were required to confess once a year (Orthodox in the Slavic tradition) the experience was generally all done before the Holy Thursday Liturgy and did not allow for much instruction from the priests.

Fr. Schmemann’s recommendations were considered radical by some. He promoted the practice of a general confession where more emphasis could be given to the priest’s exhortation and promote a higher call to holiness. It also facilitated confession more regularly which contributed to a higher level of participation in the sacraments.

I really appreciated this chapter because it helped contextualize Schmemann outside of his theory and put into practical terms how his sacramental vision for the world was actually implemented by Fr. Schmemann and the many Priests he influenced in his years as their teacher. It showed me Schmemann as a pastor, which is a truly wonderful perspective to have on him.

Please stay tuned as we continue our tour of We give our thanks to thee here.

If you’re interested in the intro to this series check it out here.

For the installment on chapter 1, which gives the historical background on For the Life of the World you can find that here

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 29, 2019

Understanding "For the Life of the World" in its historical context

Next Post

June 12, 2019 Schmemann's Errors in context

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Bible Books CCC Prayer Christmas Current Events Family Film Free Photo Fridays Humor hunger liturgical calendar liturgy Music Photos pope Prayer Prayerful Leader questions Quotes Review Saints Satire Scripture SYNOD SYNOD FOR THE FAMILY teaching Uncategorized video Weekly Round Up

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 April 2026 February 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 February 2025 January 2025 September 2024 June 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 August 2023 May 2023 February 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 September 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 August 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 October 2008 August 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Let my tongue cling to the roof of my mouth if I do not remember you"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Solomon Isaiah Elijah Psalmist