Noah’s Remarkably Faithful Adaptation of the Bible

Last updated on: March 28, 2014 at 11:21 pm by Billy Kangas

Noah’s Remarkably Faithful Adaptation of the Bible 2014-03-28T23:21:34-04:00 Billy Kangas

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last night I went and saw Noah, and I have to admit I was more than a little skeptical. The Story of Noah is one of the Bible stories that has fascinated, and dare I say, haunted me for my entire life. It is an incredible story that raises all the big questions about evil, God’s justice, violence, ecology, mercy and sacramentality.

I was skeptical because I have never seen the story adapted well by anyone.

Generally people adapt the story in one of two ways:

1) They white wash it and/or make it safe – in this way the dark themes and counter-cultural elements are ignored. The story ceases to challenge people, and you can walk away in roughly the same state you started in.

2) They abuse it – in this way the story is made to say something it never intended to say. The texts are misappropriated and the story becomes about something completely different then what the text seems to indicate.

This movie did neither of these things. There were some unexpected twists and turns, but I don’t think there was ever a moment when I felt they betrayed the either the message or the themes of the original story. This was a movie that was deeply faithful to the biblical material.

There wasn’t a single decision made that I felt was inconsistent with the biblical narrative. Each one showed a great deal of thought, reflection, and research into the reception tradition of the material as well as a very close reading of the text. In fact I would argue that this movie is one of the most faithful adaption of the Bible I have ever seen. Here are the 5 reasons why (Warning Spoilers!!):

It includes everything – This movie does an incredible job of taking every single word of the text in Genesis seriously. There is not a sentence which is ignored or glossed over in the whole movie. As someone who has read the text methodically I was SO impressed with the little details they noticed and brought up. They brought in characters like Methuselah who one can calculate would have been alive during the Ark’s construction by plotting genealogies. They included the nephalim (mysterious creatures of the primordial world). They included the interesting narratives about Cain’s urbanized descendants and their propensity for great violence. It was the first adaption of the story that I have encountered where the whole cycle from creation to the flood was taken seriously and weaved together within the central themes of the narrative.
It maintains the primeval cosmology of the world – This was HUGE for me. So often attempts that are made to describe the flood attempt to do so with the assumption that the world was understood in the same way back then that it is understood today. That was simply not the case. In this world there is room for the supernatural in the everyday. In this world leviathan rules the deeps. In this world our earth rests in a world between primordial waters of chaos that can burst through from above and below. This movie helps us to experience the story of Noah through the eyes of the original readers, and in that sense it is much more of a literal reading than the ill fated attempts often taken by the so called biblical-litteralists who try to fit the flood into science.
It keeps the challenge of the book – This movie is rich with the cultural critiques one encounters in the Biblical narrative. The Genesis account of the Bible offers a critical look at the emergence of urbanized society, the myth of redemptive violence, the ecological mandate of the creator and the primordial evil of men’s hearts. These themes are often glossed over with a flat Christological reinterpretation in Christian circles, and the powerful critique offered in the text itself is subsumed in anachronistic allegoricalization which we in the Church so easily fall into. This movie keeps the original themes front and center. I find this to be a powerful move. It moves the audience from the smug self-satisfaction of the sanctified and saved to a place of re-evaluation where we are forced to ask ourselves if we are not more like the violent and condemned drowned in the deluge. In this version we come to terms with the true horror of the story and it offers no easy avenues of escape or ready answers.
It reads the text carefully, and interpreted faithfully – Not only did they include everything, but they really dug into what each line could mean. There isn’t a single place where I thought the Biblical text was contradicted, but there were a LOT of places where they expanded and played with what the text could mean, making the most of little details and slight changes in wording.
It is inspired by the history of interpretations – This movie does it’s homework. It does not simply make things up out of thin air but it situates it’s imagination within the context of of a wide and diverse reception history. In this film you can find the fingerprints of of inter-testimonial apocolyptisism, the Thomistic theology of righteousness, talmudic imagination, and Christological undertones.

This movie helps to redefine the genre of Bible movies, and I think it does so in a powerful and provocative way.

Four Stars! (out of four)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 25, 2014

10 Things That Should Shock You More Than World Vision's Recent Announcement (revised)

Next Post

March 30, 2014 Live: Dialog with 'Friendly Atheist' Hemant Mehta

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Bible Books CCC Prayer Christmas Current Events Family Film Free Photo Fridays Humor hunger liturgical calendar liturgy Music Photos pope Prayer Prayerful Leader questions Quotes Review Saints Satire Scripture SYNOD SYNOD FOR THE FAMILY teaching Uncategorized video Weekly Round Up

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 April 2026 February 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 February 2025 January 2025 September 2024 June 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 August 2023 May 2023 February 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 September 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 August 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 October 2008 August 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm contains "Create in me a clean heart, O God"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 110 Psalm 70 Psalm 33 Psalm 51