Rhetorical Resources– Part Four

Last updated on: February 18, 2023 at 1:52 am by Ben Witherington

Rhetorical Resources– Part Four 2022-12-15T17:25:08-05:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Cicero was the master rhetorician of the late Republic period. He was not a philosopher, and he knew it. In the Cambridge Classic volume on The Late Republic includes a good and somewhat extensive chapter on Cicero by L.P. Wilkinson (pp 56-93). Since some time ago I have reviewed one of the best biographies on Cicero on this blog I will not focus on that aspect of this chapter. Like many a good rhetor, Cicero placed emphasis on the force of one’s arguments, not the weight of the authority of the speaker, which often could be overly influential in deciding court cases and other matters. Cicero was deeply influenced by Aristotle, perhaps particularly Aristotle’s insistence that one see and argue both sides of a matter before deciding which side to be on. Interestingly, Cicero, without diminishing the fact that higher education should focus on rhetoric, was concerned as Wilkinson reminds us to promote humane education, to promote being a well-rounded, kind, cultured person. He himself modelled such an approach to things, being well educated in philosophy, history, natural science, law and other things. It is fair to characterize the man as a moralist, very concerned about ethical rectitude. Because of this, he got a reputation with some of his peers as a prude when it came to various things. He did not like Epicureanism but leaned more in the direction of Stoicism. Cicero was very concerned with history and his own reputation long after he was gone. About history he says that the person ignorant of history remains a child for life. I wish some Christians would heed this warning.

So important was oratory to the intellectual and practical life of Rome that both Latin literature and higher education focused on it and were deeply indebted to it. Speeches were the essence of trials in Roman courts, but there were also rhetorical speeches to the popular assemblies, in the Senate, to troops before battle (see e.g. the movie Gladiator) and of course at funerals, though Romans placed less emphasis on epideictic rhetoric than Greeks did. Cicero clearly understood the power of emotion, indeed he was want to say that when dealing with a jury it was more important to engage and move their emotions than to persuade or convince them with facts or logic. While a traditional Roman like Cato preferred a pithy, unadorned directness of speech, Cicero knew that this was not adequate and so he preferred in a trial to go last, and to deal with both the more superficial and deeper emotions effectively. The ongoing effects of the 2nd Sophistic were such that advocates were often given to exaggeration, generalizations, and histrionics of various sorts. George Kennedy says that Marc Antony speech in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar gives us a clear picture of such speaking (‘Friends, Romans countrymen, lend me your ears’). The speech is full of irony, saying one thing, but meaning the opposite (‘Brutus and Cassius are honorable men’).

In an oral culture how a combination of words sounds matters a great deal, as does one’s modulation of tone of voice. And he was perfectly capable of using a panoply of rhetorical devices effectively, rhetorical questions, repetition of key terms for emphasis, deliberately mentioning things that the audience is told he will not mention (‘I will not be speaking about the questionable ethics of my opponents client…..’) and so on. Cicero knew the history of rhetoric and that Hellenistic writers had stressed there were three styles– the grand, the middle, and the plain, which in the Orator 69 Cicero aligns with the three different aims of oratory– to move, to please, and to convince. The grand style was forceful, weighty highly emotional and ornate. This is the sort of rhetoric that moderns normal mean when they say something is rhetorical. For example, C.S. Lewis’s lament about himself ‘all this is flashy rhetoric about loving you…’ Cicero, seeing which sort of rhetoric won more trials, went to the trouble to be trained in and write about Asiatic rhetoric which he defines as being of two sorts (Brutus 325): 1) the epigrammatic and brilliant which tried to charm the audience and relied on tidy or neat discourse; 2) the swift and impetuous, meant to sweep the audience along by its verbal pyrotechnics.

Letter writing in the Hellenistic age was already something that fell under the heading of literary rhetorical form of communication when done well and was not merely plebean, and Cicero exploited this, wanting some of his letters to be published and read not just by its original recipient or recipients. But to his closest friend, Atticus, the many letters do not appear to be of this sort by and large. It’s the plain unvarnished Cicero we get in those letters, with an occasional rhetorical flourish. As for his published speeches, Quintilian (10.7.30-31) tell us that Cicero wrote out before hand the exordium, the peroration and the most vital passages, and he memorized those , the rest he outlined or had certain notes to guide him when speaking (see p. 76). One of the interesting things that differed in Roman as opposed to Athenian trials is that in Rome the set rhetorical speeches were delivered before the calling of witnesses, whereas in Athens it was the reverse. Another major difference was that in Athens, the litigant himself was supposed to deliver the speech, whereas in Rome it was the litigants advocate who did so, and since he did not have to react to the witnesses the orator like Cicero in Rome could range more widely in his approach and content. In Rome the advocates personality and auctoritas counted for much, however much Cicero could be unhappy about that when he opponent was someone notable, notorious, or otherwise famous— like Caesar. Of the more than a hundred speeches Cicero gave in court we know that he won 74 cases and lost 16, and we don’t know the results of the 50 or more other cases. And without question, it was Cicero’s rhetorical tour de force, full of sound and fury, that often won him the day. Early in his career it had to be that way because he was not a traditional Roman of patrician stock, he was a ‘new man’ from Arpinum, who had to overcome his lack of ancestral pedigree. In our own age, I would commend to my readers the Philippics speeches because they are advocating for republican and even democratic freedom against dictatorial tendencies and policies, against the threat to freedom of autocracy. There is much more to be gleaned from Prof. Wilkinson’s learned treatment of Cicero and I commend the whole chapter to you. There is a reason why I have the statue of Cicero on the cover of my NT Rhetoric book— he set the pattern for orators after him, including some NT ones like Paul, and the author of Hebrews….

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 17, 2023

The Asbury Revival Rolls On

Next Post

February 19, 2023 Rhetorical Resources-- Part Five

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz