Richard Bauckham’s The Son of Man: Volume One– Part One

Last updated on: November 15, 2023 at 1:40 am by Ben Witherington

Richard Bauckham’s The Son of Man: Volume One– Part One 2023-11-10T05:55:33-05:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Richard Bauckham, ‘Son of Man’. Volume One: Early Jewish Literature, (Eerdmans, 2023), pp. 433.

Without question, one of the leading and most learned Biblical scholars in my lifetime is Richard Bauckham. When he writes a new detailed study on a subject of relevance to the study of the Bible, it deserves the full attention of the Biblical Studies guild, but not only that also of educated laity, pastors, and religion scholars in general. And such a study is this first volume on the Son of Man, which covers all the relevant literature from early Judaism (and beyond) that might help us understand Daniel’s ‘one like a son of man’ (Dan. 7.13-14). This is no small task, and requires being able to handle all sorts of languages including Ethiopic (in the case of the Parables of Enoch), Syriac, Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, and more. And since the Son of Man material has been an object of fascination and debate for many, many decades, treated by many and diverse scholars, it takes a certain amount of courage to dive into that big controversy and take a clear stand, backed up with a plethora of detailed exegetical analyses.

And when in the end Bauckham is prepared to conclude not only that Son of Man is not a title, nor a pre-existing concept in early Judaism (it simply means ‘a man’) and does not refer to a divine or quasi-divine figure such as an angel, nor in Dan. 7 is it a mere cipher for the Jewish saints or Israel as a whole, but rather refers to a human being who had existed on earth, was taken up into heaven, was authorized by the ancient of days to return to earth (on the clouds?) and judge the world either with a judicial verdict, or militarily on behalf of God’s people, well then he has thrown down the gauntlet, and in the process critiqued a whole host of theories, theses and detailed studies of the matter. Whether this figure is viewed as someone like Enoch, or Joshua, or David or one of his descendants, this figure is said by Bauckham not to stand apart from other OT and early Jewish messianic ideas, but rather is a sort of culmination or combination of various messianic ideas found in those sources. In short, this study is a bombshell thrown into a battlefield where many theories have already gone to die. If this study doesn’t wake up the SBL and AAR neighborhood (for example the ongoing Enoch seminar) then nothing will.

Methodologically, Richard wants us all to give a fair reading to the early Jewish and OT data without pre-judging the material on the basis of the Gospels use of the phrase Son of Man. I agree that this is only proper and fair. Further, he will argue that both the Parables of Enoch and 4 Ezra, for example come from late in the first century or early second century A.D. (and therefore could not have influenced the historical Jesus’ use of this phrase, nor for that matter the early Gospel traditions). The earliest exegesis of the material in Daniel comes from Qumran, but alas, it is very fragmentary and doesn’t help us much.

This book walks through all the relevant data, is clearly written, provides us with some charts to help us understand the implications of the data, interacts with much of the secondary literature, and is truly a tour de force. It even deals with Josephus’ handling of the Danielic material in a very helpful way and shows that while Josephus thinks that Vespasian was predicted in some of the material from Dan. 9, he certainly doesn’t see the Roman emperor as the messianic or savior figure mentioned in Dan. 7, and he also thinks that the fourth beastly empire, namely the Roman empire, will one day go down for the count, eclipsed in the end by the everlasting Kingdom of God.

I cannot praise this book sufficiently. It is a masterwork, whether you agree with Richard on all the particulars of his argument or not, and I do not. For example, I am doubtful that he is right that Dan. 7.13-14 does not refer to the worship of the Son of Man figure by all humankind. And nothing in Dan. 7 itself suggests that this person once existed on earth, died (or was ‘taken up’) and will later return to earth to judge the world (certainly in the Parables of Enoch we are not talking about someone who died and went to heaven). Richard thinks that even if worship is mentioned in Dan. 7 this is so only because God has invested him to be the plenipotentiary who judges the world. But it is the one like a Son of Man, and not merely his functions that is being worshipped in Dan. 7, and in any case as the Old Greek Daniel suggests in several places, this should be seen as worship, not merely obeisance to some august human figure.

Nevertheless, I along with all other serious readers of this book will have their minds teased into active thought, and will need to begin a process of re-evaluation of much of what we have thought before about Daniel’s ‘bar enosh’ . This book should be in every college and seminary library where Biblical religion is studied at all. And we should eagerly look forward to Volume 2 whenever it emerges. It is likely as well to be ground-breaking, if not putting the cat amongst a large flock of pigeons.

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Uncategorized

Who then is the Son of Man?

Previous Post

November 14, 2023

When Sales Persons Cross the Line

Next Post

November 19, 2023 You Can Tell When a Church is Trying too Hard to Please

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz