Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

bibleandculture

William Campbell’s Romans– The Dialogue Part Eighteen

Last updated on: June 18, 2023 at 1:09 am   by Ben Witherington

William Campbell’s Romans– The Dialogue Part Eighteen 2023-05-17T14:14:38-04:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Q. Here are some thoughts about some of the major building blocks of your argument and my issues with how you read the text of Romans. I don’t really think you can get around the universalism of 3.20 ‘by works of the law ‘all flesh’ which includes Jews cannot be set right with God’. This is so for two reasons: 1) Paul believes in the universality of sin and of all being sinners, and that all need Christ, the Jewish messiah to redeem them. Indeed, Paul is exhibit A that even very observant Jews need to be redeemed by Christ; 2) while allowing that comparatively speaking Gentiles are far worse sinners that Jews, and so some Jews could be said to be righteous by comparison, nevertheless all need the grace of God in Christ to be saved; 3) here is where the work of Sanders is helpful. He is right that OT religion is not some sort of graceless religion so that we could pit Judaism in general vs. Christianity as religions of works righteousness vs. religions of grace. This is false. What is however true is that there were plenty of early Jews who believed that by works righteousness, by obedience to Torah they maintained their righteousness before God and so did not need to be ‘born again’ or a new creature in Christ. And herein lies the rub. Paul believes that not merely getting in but staying in is a matter of God’s grace, and not just obedience after one gets in and one needs the grace that comes from Christ for that. At 10.3 you do not pay attention to ‘they tried to establish righteousness for themselves’ (by keeping Torah) as a critique of Jews who don’t follow Christ. In Paul’s view everyone ultimately must receive the righteousness that comes from Christ now that the messianic times have dawned, and so there is a critique here of Jewish ‘works righteousness’. i.e. by doing the Law. See the volume by Seifrid, Carson, and O’Brien, on Variegated Nomism Vol. 1: The Complexities of 2nd Temple Judaism. Examples where works righteousness is advocated include 4 Ezra 7; Sirach 3:14, 30; 16:14; 2 Baruch 14:12; 24:1; 41:6; Testament of Abraham A12:12–13; A 14:2–4; Rule of the Community (1QS) I, 7–8; III, 9–12; Pesher Habakkuk (1QpHab) VIII, 1–3; Miqsat Ma‘ase Ha-Torah (4QMMT) C 26–32; m. Abot 2:16; 3:15; 4:11, 22; and t. Qiddushin 1:13–16. There are more examples.  So, some Jews did indeed try to maintain or establish their right standing with God through works of the Law. Sanders simply says they were being inconsistent with their existing theology of God’s gracious acceptance of them despite their sins. How would you respond?

A. I can easily admit there might have been some Jews who thought this, but that is not Paul’s main concern. First of all we need to be careful with the interpretation of all these sources you mention above. I think it is not warranted to compare Paul with Rabbinic sources without clarifying this methodologically as it is notoriously difficult to date the latter. With regards to the Second Temple sources, lumping these together as evidence for a notion of works righteousness is methodologically questionable. As none of these addresses the role of doing the Torah by gentiles, they reflect inner-Jewish discussions and should be read in light of their specific contexts and issues that are being addressed. So let’s turn to Paul and the passages you mention.

As for 10.3 I translate this as ‘for being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and trying to establish (it) for themselves, they have not submitted to God’s righteousness’ (Commentary, 268). My view is that Paul is saying that those who do not see the inbreaking of messianic time in Christ think that God’s righteousness at this non-messianic time is for them, the people Israel, for them alone, and not also for gentiles. They have a limited perception of the extent of God’s righteousness now revealed in Christ.

Concerning 3.20, I agree this applies to Jews and non-Jews alike. Any Jew would agree to that. The question what is meant by erga nomou however, needs further qualification. I know that is traditionally understood as meaning observing Torah as a means of obtaining grace. However, in Jewish understanding, observing Torah is in response to God’s unconditional grace evident in his calling Israel into being, and committing himself to his people. Of course this response is part of belonging to God, and the Torah provides guidance for life in this relation. Anything else would amount to cheap grace.

In my opinion, Paul does not have this response aspect in view when he uses the rare expression erga nomou. If gentiles who wish to belong to this God, observe Torah, that is, follow its guidance, they do not do this in response to God’s call, because they have not had such a call (they are not Israel). Hence, what they do possibly with best intentions is done to earn God’s grace which in Paul’s view can come to gentiles only through Christ. It is they who need to understand that Israel is only Israel by God’s graceful call, nothing they did ever earned them God’s love. So for gentiles this graceful call came through Christ at the dawn of messianic time. Now gentiles through Christ can also be called in grace, and live a life in relation to this God. They are also expected to respond to this call with their entire way of life, as Paul outlines in Rom 12.

Education and Religion

History and Religion

Uncategorized

What counts as works of the Law?

Works righteousness?

Previous Post



June 17, 2023

William Campbell's Romans-- The Dialogue Part Seventeen

Next Post



June 19, 2023 William Campbell's Romans-- The Dialogue Part Nineteen


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What nation took Israel into captivity in 722 BC?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Assyria Egypt Persia Babylon

Books by This Author Books by Ben Witherington

See All Titles »

Related posts from The Bible and Culture

Family

Westminister Abbey-- Part Two

The Bible and Culture

Family

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

The Bible and Culture

Family

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

The Bible and Culture

Family

The British Museum-- Part Two

The Bible and Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Reflections on the Attempted Revolution in France

  Last night, flipping through some of the television channels before flipping...

October and the Psychology of Spooky Season

Every October, something curious happens. People who spend most of the year...

Nineties Worship Night Puts Spotlight on Retro Praise...

Nineties Worship Night rekindles a generation’s “heart songs,” blending nostalgia with renewed...

Did Ethiopia Steal The Arks of The Covenant?

Did Ethiopia steal The Arks of The Covenant? Welcome back to our...

Sunday Readings: Love God and Neighbor

The readings for the Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time focus on one...

When to Use AI and When Not To

Drawing on my new book with Trevor Sutton, "Irreplaceable: Humanity, Vocation, and...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube