How Not to Interpret the Bible Part Five. Interpret Everything Allegorically

Last updated on: August 7, 2022 at 1:03 am by Ben Witherington

How Not to Interpret the Bible Part Five. Interpret Everything Allegorically 2022-07-12T12:45:57-04:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Bible is not, overall, a piece of coded literature written in elaborately allegorical manner with all sorts of hidden meanings, which needs to be decoded to be understood. Thank goodness. Just to be clear what allegory is– it is a story which has a surface meaning within the story, but in fact those story elements refer primarily to things outside the story. Typical allegories are the Christian example Pilgrim’s Progress or the literary example Spencer’s The Fairy Queen. One has to be able to distinguish between a straight up allegory where so very many of the elements in the story are symbolic and refer to something outside the story, or an allegorizing of a non-allegory, which is what we find in Philo in various of his books, or once in Paul in Galatians where he allegorizes the story of Sarah and Hagar, and finally there can be a few allegorical elements in a non-allegory, for example in a parable.

Perhaps the most classic example of the over-allegorizing of a non-allegory is what Augustine did to the parable of the Good Samaritan in which the good Samaritan represents Jesus, the man lying by the side of the road represents someone dead in trespasses, the oil and wine represent the sacraments administer to revive the man, the inn represents the church and so on. But in fact this parable is about the social and racial tension between actual Samaritans and actual Jews, and Jesus is teaching how to be a neighbor even to those whom one has racial tensions with. No one hearing Jesus’ original parable when he originally told it could ever have interpreted it to refer to the later Christian theology Augustine reads into the story. A parable is an extended metaphor or comparison (‘the kingdom of God is like…) and occasionally it will have allegorical elements, for example in the parable of the sower in Mark 4 the seed is said to be the Word of God. But not all the elements in a parable have some referent outside the story or analogy itself.

In the early church there developed two schools broadly of interpretation of the Bible, a more allegorical approach typified by the writers who, like Philo, came from Alexandria– Clement of Alexandria and Origen, as opposed to the more historical approach typified by Chrysostom and others of the Antioch school. Modern historical study of the Bible has revealed that for the most part, the Bible writers wanted their writings to be interpreted in a non-allegorical manner. Even the parables were not straight up allegories.

And it is a mistake to over-read the OT in an allegorical way. For example ‘the angel of the Lord’ in the OT is not the Son of God. He is…. wait for it, an angel and as the author of Hebrews makes quite clear in Hebrews 1, the Son of God is far above the category of angels. Or again Melchizedek is not Christ in disguise, and needing decoding. As the book of Hebrews makes clear he is a type or foreshadowing of Christ. There was no incarnation of the Son of God in human history before the incarnation in Mary’s womb. HOWEVER, this is not to say that the pre-existent Son of God was not involved in OT history in any way. He is identified with the figure of Wisdom in Prov. 8-9 and Proverbs 3, and see the Wisdom of Solomon 17ff. When Paul says, in 1 Cor. 10 ‘and the rock was Christ’ he is applying what had previously been said of Wisdom in Wisdom of Solomon to the Son of God. He was involved as God’s Wisdom from heaven directed, guiding, nourishing God’s people all long. Or again the three angelic messengers that visited Abraham were not the Holy Trinity. They were, wait for it— angels!! The reason Paul is able to partially and cleverly allegorize a non-allegorical story in Gal. 4 is because some of his audience are Jews and already know it is a historical story with a historical meaning, so what Paul is doing is riffing, he is doing something in addition to the normal way of interpreting a well-known story. And probably he is deliberately doing it as a critique of the Judaizers who are bothering his converts. He lines up Hagar with Mt. Sinai with Jerusalem, a surprising and non-historical triad to be sure, in order to make clear to his mostly Gentile converts that they should not get themselves circumcised and be forced to keep the whole Mosaic Law. This is allegorizing a well-known non-allegory.

In some ways over-allegorizing a Biblical text is rather like over-spiritualizing it. Take for example, the Beatitude which in Matthew reads ‘blessed are the poor in spirit’ but in Luke reads ‘Blessed are the poor’. Now the over-spiritualizing interpretation will focus on the former and assume it has nothing to do with real poverty, but this is quite impossible if one looks at the Lukan version. Jesus was obviously very concerned not just with the spiritual welfare of human beings but also the physical well being– hence the feeding of the 5,000 and also the exhortation in Matthew about ‘inasmuch as you have not done it unto the least of these….’ and the parable of the rich man and Lazarus. The Gospel is not just about dispensing spiritual McNuggets which do not challenge our thinking about our obligations to the poor and the indigent.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 6, 2022

How Not to Interpret the Bible. Part Four-- Interpreting Everything Literally

Next Post

August 8, 2022 How Not to Interpret the Bible. Part Six-- Bad Eschatology

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz