An Important Book on the Codex

Last updated on: May 19, 2018 at 1:51 am by Ben Witherington

An Important Book on the Codex 2018-05-01T20:57:10-04:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here’s a helpful post by my friend Larry Hurtado on the early history of the Codex.

Typology of the Early Codex, Turner
by larryhurtado

A couple of weeks ago I mentioned that Wipf and Stock were bringing out a reprint of the classic study by Eric G. Turner, The Typology of the Early Codex (Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock, 2011; ISBN 978-1-61097-008-2; orig. ed., 1977), and at an impressively cheap price ($22 US). My own copy arrived yesterday, and I’m pleased to have one at last. It was out of print for many years, so one had to find a library copy where one could. Used copies were on Amazon, etc., at ridiculous prices. So, what have Wipf and Stock done for us?

In fact, all that you could realistically want, and at an unbelievably decent price. It’s paperback, naturally, but this is an edition for individuals, not libraries. They seem to have reduced the book-size somewhat, so the margins are really thin. But the important point is that the book is all there and in a clear and very legible reprint of the original. (The photos of manuscripts have lost something in the reprinting, but they were only really illustrative.)

This volume remains essential for any serious student of early manuscripts, Christian or non-Christian. It remains unrivalled and (sadly) without a successor. Turner was unexcelled as a papyrologist and expert in Greek palaeography, so his judgments are always weighty and departed from with peril. The heart of the book is a valuable (and unique) table of some 500 codices of literary texts, giving the contents, writing material, dimensions of the writing area and the manuscript-page, approx. date, number of columns, and number of lines per page. The table includes pretty much all codices published up to November 1973. A goodly number have appeared since then, but no one has produced an updated table (a project for someone).

In addition, the book comprises chapters based on lectures Turner gave at the University of Pennsylvania, and these too are observations from a master in the field. Chapter 1: “Towards a Typology of the Codex”, the initial sentence: “The greatest benefactors of mankind are unsung and unknown–the inventor of the wheel, the deviser of the alphabet. Among their number we should place the inventor of the codex” (p. 1). Here Turner surveys various previous attempts to classify the body of ancient codices, and illustrates the problems and errors of some past work.

Chapter 1: “The Dimensions of Papyrus and Parchment Codices”, is a detailed study of the page-sizes of the large body of codices studied, Turner offering a proposed set of groupings of page-dimensions. His groupings are still referred to regularly in descriptions of newly-published codices.

Chapter 3: “The priority of Parchment or Papyrus?”. Turner here lays out reasons for re-considering what had been the common view that the codex-format began with parchment writing material. In Chapter 4: “Manufacture and Size,” Turner shows how and why parchment and papyrus codices have different dimensions.

Chapter 5: “How a Codex Was Made Up,” remains the best single concise description of the actual processes involved, with helpful drawings to illustrate matters. The chapter also includes lists of codices constructed variously (i.e., “single gathering”, or 2multiple-gathering” approaches). Chapter 6: “The Codex and the Scribe” addresses how scribes/copyists were involved in the use of a codex. Turner notes that a different skill-set was required of a copyist using a codex in comparison to a roll.

In the final chapter (7: “The Form and Date of the Earliest Codices,” Turner lays out his proposal that the size/dimensions of codices may reflect the rough dates of their composition. This is the key thesis that Turner wished to put forth, and it is sad that (to my knowledge) it has not really been fully tested subsequently.

But, whatever the validity of Turner’s hypothesis, the book gives an essential body of data that students of early Christianity should know about, especially those of us interested in early Christian texts and how they were used.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 18, 2018

Gordon Fee's Take of Revelation

Next Post

May 20, 2018 Hurtado on the Son of Man

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz