Roman but not Catholic— Part Six

Last updated on: January 11, 2018 at 1:54 am by Ben Witherington

Roman but not Catholic— Part Six 2018-01-04T09:55:31-05:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Q. What do you hope the impact will be of this book? Was it mainly written to prevent wavering Protestants from moving in the direction of the Catholic church? I mention this especially in light of the statistics you do mention in a note that far more Catholics are heading in the Protestant direction than vice versa worldwide it would see,

A. I intended this book for both Protestants and Roman Catholics. In terms of Protestants they must come to learn that they are truly the Church without any sacramental or ministerial deficiency. To be sure, Rome’s overweening ecclesiology has done much damage to the broader church in diminishing Protestant theological traditions and thereby causing considerable doubt among some of its weaker members. Beyond this Rome has divided the Lord’s Table, the deathbed, and has condemned a whole class of Christians (many from Latin and South America) by maintaining that if they have left the Roman Catholic church, let’s say in order to become Pentecostal evangelicals, then they are excommunicated from the church of Jesus Christ. This is the great falsehood required by Roman Catholic ecclesiology. That this judgment is richly accurate can be seen when the following question is considered: if Pentecostals who were initially baptized as Roman Catholics are fully recognized as the brothers and sisters in Christ that they truly are, then Rome would emerge simply as one Christian theological tradition among others—and that’s precisely what it rejects, what it simply above all else will not tolerate.

In terms of Roman Catholics they must come to learn that they are not the center of the church, since their tradition emerged very clearly in 589 when it distinguished itself from Greek Orthodoxy by breaking the ancient ecumenical consensus through interpolating the Nicene-Constantinoplan creed and then yet again in 1054 when it participated in actual schism in which no particular theological tradition, neither Roman Catholicism nor Eastern Orthodoxy, can ever again claim be the center. Given these historical realities, it is best then for Roman Catholics to be more humble when they sit at the table with Eastern Orthodox and Protestants, more appreciative of the gifts and graces in these Christian traditions. Indeed, knowing that Roman Catholicism is not the Church (with capital letters) to the diminishment of so many other Christians, in other words, recognizing that Rome is simply one Christian theological tradition among many, though an important one, all of this will go a long way in inculcating the proper Christian graces of humility, lowliness, appreciation for others, and even genuine endearing love when Roman Catholics have the good fortune to be in the presence of Christians beyond their own particular tradition. Such a change of heart, attitude and life celebrates the gracious unity that all Christians have in a transcendent Christ who is ever over all: one Lord, one faith and one baptism.

Jerry: I would only add that I saw a need for some serious Protestant “pushback” to aggressive Roman claims of late.

Q. Have either of you had occasion to dialogue with Catholic scholars in your fields about these subjects in recent years? I ask because of course there is often a difference between de jure what the official teaching is of a church, and de facto where most of the scholars, clergy and laity are in their beliefs. My own experience has suggested that various Catholic scholars, priests, and laity probably agree mostly with various of your arguments, whether they would say so or not in a public debate. I cannot say whether they are representative of the general leanings of the church or not.

A. Yes, Dr. Witherington is surely correct in pointing out the difference between de jure and de facto, between the official teaching of the Roman Catholic Church and what particular Roman Catholic scholars are actually offering in the classroom. We have focused on the former, that is, the official teaching of the Roman Catholic church, since the latter, as Jerry Walls has so ably argued in his chapter “The Deeply Divided Church of Rome: The World’s Largest Pluralist Christian Denomination?” often resembles not the teaching of the Vatican but that of liberal, pluralistic Protestantism, a Protestantism that we reject. And Yes there will also be some Roman Catholic theologians and historians who will, by and large, agree with many of our major points, but given their ecclesiastical and ongoing working environment, they are likely to keep such agreement to themselves.

Jerry: Well, I often say, show me a zealous Roman Catholic, and I will show you a former evangelical or fundamentalist. Perhaps many “cradle Catholics” hardly differ from Protestants, but the converts are another matter. The people in my field that have converted often seem zealous to defend the official Roman line on all matters.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 10, 2018

Roman but not Catholic-- Part Five

Next Post

January 12, 2018 Roman but not Catholic--- Part Seven

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz