Stephen Saylor’s– ‘Raiders of the Nile’ (or a ‘Bandit’s Life for Me’)

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 10:54 pm by Ben Witherington

Stephen Saylor’s– ‘Raiders of the Nile’ (or a ‘Bandit’s Life for Me’) 2015-03-13T22:54:09-04:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is a rather fine line between pandering to one’s audience, and seeking to please them. Sometimes even very good writers cross the line. Stephen Saylor is indeed an excellent novelist of ancient Rome and its environs and I would recommend his sub Rosa series to anyone interested in learning more about that culture and time. Indeed, I have used one of his novels in a NT class (A Mist of Prophecies). I approached the reading of this novel with a bit of hesitation and trepidation because I found the last one, Seven Wonders, flawed in various respects(see the review on this blog). It was a travelogue without having much of a linear plot to it, and there were some missteps along the way.

Such cannot be said of ‘Raiders of the Nile’ which in some respects is a welcome return to form. The plot is clear (Bethesda, the love of young Gordianus’ life and also his slave, is kidnapped. He must find and rescue her.) The geographical setting is interesting– Alexandria and the Nile Delta region. So is the historical setting of 88 B.C. when there was turmoil for the Ptolemies.

But in fact this novel is so plot and action driven that there is very little historical description involved and the political intrigue is entirely put on the back burner in order to foreground Gordianus’ desperate search for his sweetheart. The sub Rosa series of novels, while not without its occasional light touches, were far more serious in tone than this novel and more historically substantive (as was for instance Saylor’s excellent Roma).

This novel is closer to pure entertainment (the only new fact I learned was that the Pharos lighthouse at the time was the tallest building in the known world), and there is nothing particularly wrong with that. Saylor admits in his Afterword that he has been reading ancient novels (which were mostly the ancient equivalent of Harlequin Romances), and this story shows that influence. But even in that category, if we were going to be entertained by a novel that involves Alexandria, wild animals, intrigue, romance, and the like, I would direct the reader to Lindsey Davis’ Alexandria rather than to this novel.

This novel is an enjoyable after dinner treat, complete with surprise ending, but at time it stretches credulity well past the breaking point (for example Gordianus and Bethesda rescued from the ocean by the King’s barge that just happened to be passing by—- seriously????), and resorts to humor that could never have been part of the ancient world but rather was meant to make a modern audience grin (‘What happens in Canopus, stays in Canopus’).

[Spoiler Alert: Those who have not read any of the sub Rosa series may wish to skip the next paragraph]

And then there is the following problem. For those of us who have been devoted fans of the whole Gordianus series, while it is enjoyable to know of the life of young Gordianus, there can hardly be any absolute suspense to a story like this when one knows already in advance that whatever happens to Gordianus and Bethesda in this tale, it surely cannot be fatal to either of them, since they go on to live long productive lives together. This is always the danger of a pre-quel— it is hard to blow up the balloon and make the plot fly when one knows the general outcome and the destination in advance. So instead, Saylor resorts to turning young Gordianus into a character in an Indiana Jones type tale (even the title does something of an hommage in that direction) or better yet a Pirates of the Caribbean type tale.

Again, there is nothing wrong with pure entertainment, but when one goes the route this novel does, with a much less historically substantive and serious character to the story, one stands in danger of caricaturing one’s own characters and one’s own earlier excellent work. If we simply ask the question Russell Crowe asks from the arena in ‘Gladiator’ ‘Are you not entertained?’ Then the answer is yes. This is an enjoyable romp, and would make good beach reading. But if we ask the question— ‘Are you not educated, enthralled, inspired to learn more of Gordianus’ world?’ the answer is probably no.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 30, 2014

What's Wrong with 'Just Win Baby'?

Next Post

April 1, 2014 Wright's Paul and the Faithfulness of God-- Part Twenty Nine

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz