The Jewish Annotated New Testament– a Review

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 11:04 pm by Ben Witherington

The Jewish Annotated New Testament– a Review 2015-03-13T23:04:49-04:00 Ben Witherington

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by larryhurtado

Back from the Chicago annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature: Running into numerous friends and colleagues, browsing what is certainly the largest book display on religions/theology on the planet, more sessions on more topics than anyone could possible handle, and more.

My own small contribution this year was to take part in a panel-review session devoted to a new and important volume: The Jewish Annotated New Testament, eds. A.-J. Levine and Marc Brettler (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011). My own assignment was to approach the book as a NT scholar, and with special attention to how christological issues and passages were handled. Each of us had 15 minutes, and so I had to be selective in what I included in my own presentation. That’s always tough, because you’re expected to give any candid criticisms, but you don’t want them to overshadow too much what might be overall a positive view of a book.

And I can say immediately that I’m positive about this book. Levine and Brettler in particular are to be commended. There will have been many, many hours devoted to many unforeseen tasks involved in getting together a book involving 50 contributors (all Jewish scholars), and resulting in this impressive work. I know a bit about editing a multi-author work (though nothing involving this many people), and I can guess what invisible efforts they devoted to the volume.

Essentially, the contributors show the Jewishness of the NT (i.e., the various and many historical connections of the NT writings to the ancient Jewish settiunng in which what became Christianity first emerged). There are lots of references to Jewish texts and phenomena that illustrate this. Each NT writing introduced and then a running commentary on its text (the NRSV used as the text commented on). In addition, there are some 30 mini-essays in the back of the book on a host of topics.

The editors’ hopes are twofold: They want fellow Jews to get over their fear and/or uninformed loathing of the NT and read it, seeing how these writings reflect ancient Jewish tradition and contribute to our knowledge of it. They also want Christians to realize the Jewishness in the NT, and so to get over the ill-informed stereotypes of ancient Jewishness: e.g., Jesus was in “conflict” with Judaism, Judaism was a mean-old religion of dour works-righteousness, etc. Personally, I hope that many of those Christians called on to preach will probe the book.

On the specifics of how well the book introduces the NT and how well it handles christological matters, I’ve both praise and some criticisms. I won’t repeat all the details here (and may publish my review in due course). But, to focus on the latter, I did sense what seemed like a kind of “tone-deafness” to the christological issues and data at some points. E.g., in the otherwise good treatment of Philippians and the “Christ-hymn” in Philip 2:6-11, I find no mention that vv. 9-11 reflect a stunning revisionist-reading of the passage in Isaiah 45 where a universal acclamation of God (YHWH) is predicted. In the allusion to this passage in Philip 2:9-11 we see early Christians novel affirmation that the universal acclamation of God is to take place in the form of a universal acclamation of Jesus as “Kyrios”.

Likewise, in the comments on Romans 10:13, there is no indication of a similar stunning re-interpretation of the OT passage (Joel 2:32) proclaiming that “everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved”. In Rom 10:13, clearly this devotional/worship act of acclamation/invocation is now directed to Jesus as Lord.

There are some broader instances of this tone-deafness, perhaps none more so than the discussion of Revelation. The contributor declares that for the author of Revelation the key thing wasn’t Christ but ritual purity! Hmm. In a book entitled by its author “Revelation of Jesus Christ”, one would expect that Jesus is pretty crucial. And it seems to me that in many ways the text of Revelation confirms this, including the remarkable scene in Rev 5 where “the Lamb” is co-recipient with God of the universal worship depicted there.

Perhaps, in the well-intentioned aim of trying to show similarities of the NT to other Jewish texts/traditions/ideas, contributors failed to note adequately the remarkable and innovative role of Jesus in the religious thought and practice reflected in the NT. But authentic religious dialogue requires us to to note (preferably sympathetically) both similarities and differences.

But these criticisms, notwithstanding, I do commend the book to a wide “general” readership.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 28, 2012

Hurtado on the Worship of Jesus--- Revisited

Next Post

December 30, 2012 Life's Too Short----My 61rst Birthday

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz