Water for Elephants— Second Run, but not Second Rate

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 11:13 pm by Guest Contributor

Water for Elephants— Second Run, but not Second Rate 2015-03-13T23:13:29-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A few weeks ago I had the privilege of meeting Hal Holbrook while I was in Malibu. He had come to the Christian Scholars Conference and asked to perform Mark Twain on Religion. I hear it was a classic. I unfortunately was in my own session discussing one of my books. But in any case, it was a pleasure to meet him and I thanked him for all the wonderful roles he has played.

His most recent role is at the beginning and end of the film ‘Water for Elephants’ where he plays the elderly Jacob Jankowski, a Polish man who trained to be a vet at Cornell, but ended up being an animal minder in the Benzini Bros. circus. He is wonderful in this bit part which frames the entire movie, and makes the bulk of the film a flash back. The movie in essence is a circus movie, and what a circus that circus was, as it turns out.

Unfortunately, this film came out during the Dead Zone, by which I mean early January until late April. And in the Dead Zone there are a lot of bad films, and unfortunately any good films that are released during these months usually die on the vine, as they are not well attended, and sometimes not even well reviewed. This I am afraid is what happened to Water for Elephants which, while not a perfect film is in many ways an excellent film, not least for the fabulous acting of Christopher Waltz who has gone from playing a slightly insane Nazi to playing a slightly insane (and insanely jealous and violent) circus owner and ringmaster named August.

This movie is well paced (it clocks in at 2 hours and 1 minute) it is colorful as circuses are, and beautifully filmed (I especially loved the night scenes as the steam train is puffing away under a moonlit sky), and it has an interesting plot and interesting characters. The time is 1931 during the Depression, and people are looking for a diversion from their ordinary, hum-drum, even unemployed lives. Then the circus comes to town and for a few brief minutes or hours, the mind of the masses is taken to a different place, a different mardi gras like world with odd looking people, remarkably scary animals amazing daredevil stunts, and the like. I have seen numerous circuses in my time (including the Moscow circus in Moscow) and I have to say that this movie is quite believable in its tales of the mayhem and macabre, the transient lives of a troupe who sometimes are troopers, and sometimes feel like they have been hijacked into a menagerie that is an army.

At the heart of this movie however is a love story. Reese Witherspoon is quite effective as Marlena the beautiful former orphan the object d’desire and the star of the circus and the wife of August. Robert Pattinson plays the young Jacob, the heartthrob veterinarian down on his luck and having tragically lost his parents who hops on a train one day, only discover that it is the circus train. Pattinson is of course handsome, but it is hard to tell whether his acting is under-stated deliberately, or he is under-acting. In any case the contrast between his acting and the brilliant performance by Waltz is noticeable and is one of the flaws in the film. Witherspoon is however a nice buffer between the two.

The story actually also centers on a horse who founders and has to be put down, which Marlena used to ride, and a Elephant named Rosie who only responds to commands in Polish! Enter Jacob as the hero who can train her properly. But the sexual tension between Jacob and Marlena on the one hand and the jealousy between August and Jacob on the other hand is what makes this an interesting, smoldering love story worth watching. As it turns out, the real three ring circus is composed of three irrationally behaving humans, while the animals seem mostly tame and innocent.

I thoroughly enjoyed this period piece, and in places it made me cry, reminding me of when I first went to the circus as a child in the 50s. As it turns out, the circus in the 30s was not much different than the circus that showed up at county fairs in the 50s. If you have a chance to see this movie, it is in fact a good date movie, with a good romantic core. As it turns out ‘Water for Elephants’ should have brought refreshment to more than thirsty pachyderms. It should have brought some refreshment to those who go to the movies longing for a poignant love story. if you have a chance still to see this film in the theaters, even in the dollar theater as I did, you should go. It’s PG 13 rating is accurate.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 29, 2011

Hurtado on Manuscript Longevity Again

Next Post

July 31, 2011 Bad Hombres (circa 1992)-- Who Are Those Guys?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz