Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Benjamin the Scribe

New Testament Gospel Doctrine Lesson 28: Acts 1-5

Last updated on: July 23, 2015 at 7:42 pm   by Ben Spackman

New Testament Gospel Doctrine Lesson 28: Acts 1-5 2015-07-23T19:42:43-05:00 Ben Spackman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today we begin something new that is neither here nor there. Acts is not a letter, like so much of the rest of the New Testament will be. But it’s not a gospel, like the first four books we’ve read. Luke makes clear that it’s a sequel of sorts to his gospel.

“In the first book [i.e. Luke], Theophilus, I wrote about all that Jesus did and taught from the beginning” Acts 1:1.

Compare Luke 1:1ff-

“Since many have undertaken to set down an orderly account of the events that have been fulfilled among us, 2 just as they were handed on to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word, 3 I too decided, after investigating everything carefully from the very first, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4 so that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed.”

Who is Theophilus? We don’t know. It could be Luke’s patron, who is sponsoring him to research and write about these things. It could be a Christian Luke wished to educate. Or it could be Christians in general, since it means “lover of God.” Are we meant to see ourselves as theophiloi, to whom Luke is writing? Regardless, Luke gives us the narrative Acts of the Apostles. Much of it is unique, some overlaps with parts of Paul’s letters. Remember, Luke (like Mark) is neither an eyewitness or apostle himself, but was mission companions to an Apostle. Luke and Mark both accompanied Paul, though tradition records that Mark also accompanied Peter.


1:18– Note the contrast between Judas’ death here (which explains the name of a local field in Aramaic) and Matthew 27:5, where Judas goes and hangs himself. Here, however, he “falls” head first, and his guts burst out. Note also, in Matthew, he throws the money back at the priests, who buy the field; here Judas buys the plot of land (or small field) he dies in.

Via wikipedia

Via wikipedia

C.S. Lewis had some remarkable views of scripture. I wrote recently about his view that inspired scripture could adopt, adapt, and transform Babylonian myth. Here too, he offers a mature opinion.

“Whatever view we hold of the divine authority of Scripture must make room for…. the apparent inconsistencies between the genealogies in Matt. i and Luke ii; with the accounts of the death of Judas in Matt. xxvii 5 and Acts i 18-19….It seems to me that [this and other facts] rule out the view that every statement in Scripture must be historical truth.”- C.S. Lewis on Scripture, as quoted here.

At least here, “Augustine [followed by many others] harmonizes by suggesting he hanged himself and then fell.” – David H. Stern, Jewish New Testament Commentary. Or as the Faithlife Study Bible (a free resource from Logos) says it,

“Luke records that Judas purchased the property and fell headlong. Matthew records that religious leaders bought the field and that Judas hung himself (Matt 27:3–8). The two accounts can be compatible: Judas hung himself and, as a result, fell and burst open on the ground. The religious leaders bought the property in his name following his suicide.”

That’s a possibility. But we need to be prepared for those times that competing or contrasting narratives of the same event can’t be so easily reconciled. Scripture is messy like that.


2:1 Pentecost is the Greek name of Shavu’ot, or the Feast of Weeks, which took place 50 days after Passover. Acts 1:3 reports in amazing brevity that the resurrected Jesus had been with them for 40 of those days, “speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.” That’s all scripture says, though (as is often the case), non-biblical literature filled in the gaps with imagination. Hugh Nibley wrote on it, of course, as did Griggs and Brown in The Ensign.


At the pentecostal gathering in Jerusalem, Peter and the other apostles are heard to speak in a variety of languages, to people from all over the Mediterranean. As N.T Wright points out, there’s some deep biblical allusion here. Back in Genesis, at the tower of Babel, God divides the people by causing them to speak many languages instead of one. But here, by causing them to speak many languages, God begins to unite the people into one body under the gospel umbrella. This is the beginning of the gospel going to all people, every nation, tongue, and language.

“Luke is implying, with the day of Pentecost this curse is itself overturned; in other words, God is dramatically signalling that his promises to Abraham are being fulfilled, and the whole human race is going to be addressed with the good news of what has happened in and through Jesus…. Granted, all the people present were Jewish or at least proselytes (Gentiles who had converted to Judaism), since the reason they were in Jerusalem was to attend the Jewish festival. But they had come from all over, from countries each of which would have its own native language and local dialects. Luke gives the list of where they came from in a great sprawling sweep, covering tens of thousands of square miles, from Parthia and Mesopotamia in the north and east to Rome in the west and Egypt and Arabia in the south, together with the island of Crete. The point is not to give an exact list of precisely where everyone came from in the crowded city of Jerusalem that day, but to splash across the page the sense of a great polyglot company all hearing words spoken in their own language.”- Tom Wright, Acts for Everyone

What’s the result of this multi-linguality?

“12 All were amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, “What does this mean?” 13 But others sneered and said, “They are filled with new wine.”

In other words, some only heard babbling, and assumed they were drunk (although as Peter points out, it was only 9 am.)

It’s entirely possible for us to witness something miraculous and yet have rendered ourselves incapable of perceiving it fully. C.S. Lewis illustrated this in The Last Battle. Several dwarves, as well as some of Aslan’s disciples, have been thrown into what appears to be a dark stable. The dwarves perceive it as such, but others find themselves in a sunny field with the door they have been thrown through freestanding in the middle of it. Aslan appears.

“Aslan,” said Lucy through her tears, “could you – will you – do something for these poor Dwarfs?”
“Dearest,” said Aslan, “I will show you both what I can, and what I cannot, do.” He came close to the Dwarfs and gave a low growl: low, but it set all the air shaking. But the Dwarfs said to one another, “Hear that? That’s the gang at the other end of the stable. Trying to frighten us. They do it with a machine of some kind. Don’t take any notice. They won’t take us in again!”

Aslan raised his head and shook his mane. Instantly a glorious feast appeared on the Dwarfs’ knees: pies and tongues and pigeons and trifles and ices, and each Dwarf had a goblet of good wine in his right hand. But it wasn’t much use. They began eating and drinking greedily enough, but it was clear that they couldn’t taste it properly. They thought they were eating and drinking only the sort of things you might find in a stable. One said he was trying to eat hay and another said he had a bit of an old turnip and a third said he’d found a raw cabbage leaf. And they raised golden goblets of rich red wine to their lips and said “Ugh! Fancy drinking dirty water out of a trough that a donkey’s been at! Never thought we’d come to this.”…. “Well, at any rate there’s no Humbug here. We haven’t let anyone take us in. The Dwarfs are for the Dwarfs.”

“You see, ” said Aslan. “They will not let us help them. They have chosen cunning instead of belief. Their prison is only in their own minds, yet they are in that prison; and so afraid of being taken in that they cannot be taken out.

When we hear the gospel preached, are we spiritually sensitive enough to hear salvation, or do we hear incomprehensible babbling? If the latter, how do we change?

Lastly, as always, you can support this site and my research by making Amazon purchases through this link, or the Support My Research links at the bottom of the About page. You can get updates by email whenever a post goes up (subscription box on the right). If you friend me on Facebook, please drop me a note telling me you’re a reader.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



July 19, 2015

New Testament Gospel Doctrine Lesson 27: Matt. 28:1-20, Luke 24, John 20-21, Mark 16.

Next Post



August 7, 2015 New Testament Gospel Doctrine Lesson 29: Acts 6-9


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category ancient languages Announcements Book of Mormon books D&C evolution Genesis Gospel Doctrine Gospel Doctrine Resources history LDS Church History New Testament Old Testament prophets science and religion scripture study Seminary teaching temple Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 January 2010 December 2009


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who found baby Moses in the river?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Pharaoh himself Miriam An Egyptian priest Pharaoh’s daughter

Related posts from Benjamin the Scribe

Latter-day Saint

Theological Twinkies and our Spiritual Diet

Benjamin the Scribe

Latter-day Saint

Covenant and law, grace, works, and faith.

Benjamin the Scribe

Latter-day Saint

News!

Benjamin the Scribe

Latter-day Saint

On Hiatus until June

Benjamin the Scribe

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube